Approximation for Certain Stancu Type Summation Integral Operator
2018-05-24PrernaMaheshwari
Prerna Maheshwari
Department of Mathematics,SRM University Delhi-NCR Campus,Modinagar(UP),India
1 Introduction
H.M.Srivastava and V.Gupta[15],proposed a certain family of linear positive operators defined as
x∈[0,∞),where
and
• forc=0,φn(x)=e−nx,we obtain Phillips operators,
• forc∈N,φn(x)=(1+cx)−n c,we get the discretely defined Baskakov-Durrmeyer operators.
The sequence{φn}n∈Nof the function defined on an interval[0,b],b>0 satisfies the following properties for everyn∈N,k∈N0,
1.φn,c∈C∞([a,b]),
2.φn,c(0)=1,
3.φn,cis completely monotone i.e.,(−1)
4.There exist an integercsuch that
Remark 1.1.Functionsφn,chave many applications in different fields of Science and Mathematics like potential theory,probability theory,Physics and Numerical Analysis.A collection of most interesting properties of such functions can be found in[17].
These operators are also termed as Srivastava-Gupta operators(see[2,10,16]).In[7],authors have considered the Bezier variant of these operators and estimated the rate of convergence for functions of bounded variation.Motivated by the sequenceGn,Gupta et al.[4]also defined a mixed family of summation integral operators with different weight function.In approximation theory the genuine type of operators are very important,as they are defined implicitly with values of functions at end points of the interval in which the operators are defined.In 1954,Phillips[14]introduced such operators and later Mazhar and Totik[8]discussed these operators in different form.
In[5,11,12]authors have also studied in this direction and discussed different approximation properties of various operators.
Based on two parametersα,βand satisfying the condition 0≤α≤β,motivated by the recent work on Stancu type of generalization(see[1,9,13])in the present paper,we consider the Stancu type generalization of operators(1.1)as
wherepn,v(x,c)is defined above in(1.2).In this paper,we study simultaneous approximation for the casec=1 of the operators defined in(1.3)and establish Voronovskaja type asymptotic formula and error estimation.To obtain moments by using hypergeometric series,we use the technique developed by[6].
2 Alternate forms
The operatorsfor the casec=1 can be written as below.Forx∈[0,∞)
where the kernel
withδ(t)is Dirac delta function andpn,v(x)andbn,v(t)are Baskakov and Beta basis functions and are defined as
where the Pochhammer symbol(n)vis defined as
andB(n,v)are Beta functions.The operators(2.1b)can be written as
Using the hypergeometric series properties
we have
on applying Pfaff-Kummar transformation
we get
This is the alternate form of the operators(2.1b)in terms of hypergeometric function.
3 Auxiliary results
In this section,we present some lemmas,which will be useful for the proof of main theorem.
Lemma 3.1.For n>0and r≥1,we have
and
Proof.Takingf(t)=tr,using the transformationt=(1+x)zand applying Pfaff-Kummar transformation,we get
using(n+v)!=n!(n+1)v,we get
Thus,we complete the proof.
Now using
we have
Lemma 3.2.For0≤α≤β,we have
Proof.The relation between the operators(1.1)and the operators(2.2)can be defined as
by applying(3.2),we get the required result.
Lemma 3.3(see[3]).Let m∈N∪{0}and
then Un,0(x)=1,Un,1(x)=0and there holds the recurrence relation
and Uwhere[α]being the integral part of α.
Lemma 3.4.For m∈N∪{0},we define the central moments as
for n>(m+1),following recurrence relation holds
here
Consequently for each x∈[0,∞),we have from above recurrence relation that
Proof.The values ofµn,0(x)andµn,1(x)easily follow from the definition of operators(2.1a).To prove the recurrence relation,we apply the following identities
we get
Therefore,
On using the identity
we get
Integrating by parts and rearranging the terms,we get
hence the proof is finished.
Lemma 3.5(see[3]).There exists the polynomials φi,j,r(x),independent of n and v such that
4 Main results
In this section,we prove some direct results including asymptotic formula and error estimation.
Definition 4.1.LetCγ[0,∞)be defined as
then the operatorsare said to be well defined forf∈Cγ[0,∞).
Theorem 4.1.Let f∈Cγ[0,∞)be bounded on every finite subinterval of[0,∞),having the derivatives of order(r+2)at fixed0
Proof.We have the Taylor’s expansion for the functionfas
whereǫ(t,x)→0 ast→xandǫ(t,x)=o(t−x)δast→∞,for someδ>0.By using Taylor’s expansion,we have
Using Lemma 3.2,we have
In the above expressionr(r−β),(2r+α)+x(1+r−β)andx(1+x)are the coefficients off(r)(x),f(r+1)(x)andf(r+2)(x)respectively,which easily follow by using induction hypothesis onrand then taking limit asn→∞.Therefore in order to complete the proof of above theorem,it is sufficient to show thatI2→0 asn→∞.For this using Lemma 3.5,we have
asǫ(t,x)→0 whent→x,hence for a givenǫ>0,there exists a positive numberδ:|ǫ(t,x)|<ǫwhenever|t−x|<δ.Ifλis any integer≥max{λ,r+2}then for a constantM>0,which does not depend ont,we have
where|t−x|≥δ.Hence
where
Using Schwarz’s inequality,we have
On using Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 3.4,we have
and asǫis arbitrary,it implies thatI5=o(1).
Again applying Schwarz’s inequality for summation and integration and then applying Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 3.4,we have
HenceI3→0 asn→∞.Since it is clear thatI4→0 asn→∞,we getI2=o(1).Combining the estimates ofI1andI2,we get the required result.
Hence the proof of the theorem is completed.
Theorem 4.2.For f∈Cγ[0,∞),for some γ>0and r≤k≤r+2.If f(k)exists and is continuous on(a−η,b+η)⊂(0,∞),where η>0,then for sufficiently large n
where M1and M2are constants independent of f and n,ω(f,δ)is the modulus of continuity of f on(a−η,b+η)andk·kC[a,b]denotes the sup-norm on the interval[a,b].
Proof.Using Taylor’s expansion on functionf,we have
whereθlies betweentandx,andξ(t)is the characteristic function on the interval(a−η,b+η).Therefore
Using Lemma 3.2,we have
Hence
To estimateL2,we follow
By applying Schwarz’s inequality for summation and integral,we have
Therefore by Lemma 3.5 and(4.1),we get
on[a,b],where
If we chooseδ=1/√and apply(4.2)we have
Sincet∈[0,∞)(a−η,b+η),here we optδsuch that|t−x|≥δfor allx∈[a,b].Hence by Lemma 3.5
for|t−x|≥δ,we find a constantKsuch that
whereβ≥ {γ,k}is an integer.Therefore by using Schwarz’s inequality for summation and integration and using Lemma 3.3 as well as Lemma 3.4,we follow thatL3=O(1/ns),for anys>0 uniformly on[a,b].
Combining the estimates ofL1,L2andL3,we get the required result.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank to the referees for their valuable suggestion in improving the quality of paper.Author is also thankful to National Board of Higher Mathematics,for providing a plate-form for research.
References
[1]I.Buyukyazici and C.Atakut,On Stancu type generalization ofq-Baskakov operators,Math.Comput.Model.,52(5-6)(2010),752–759.
[2]N.Deo,Faster rate of convergence on Srivastava-Gupta operators,Appl.Math.Comput.,218(21)(2012),10486–10491.
[3]V.Gupta,Errorestimates for mixed summation integral type operators,J.Math.Anal.Appl.,313(2006),632–641.
[4]V.Gupta,R.N.Mohapatra and Z.Finta,On certain family of mixed summation-integral operators,Math.Comput.Model.,42(2005),181–191.
[5]V.Gupta and P.Maheshwari,Bezier variant of a new Durrmeyer type operators,Rivista Di Mate.Della Univ.di Parma,7(2)(2003),9–21.
[6]M.Ismail and P.Simeonov,On a family of positive linear operators in:notions of positively and the geometry of polynomials,Trends in Mathematics,(2011),259–274.
[7]N.Ispir and I.Yuksel,On the Bezier variant of Srivastava-Gupta operators,Appl.Math.E-Notes,5(2005),129–137.
[8]S.M.Majharand and V.Totik,Approximation by modified Szasz operators,Acta.Sci.Math.,49(1985),257–269.
[9]P.Maheshwari,Approximation properties of certainq-genuine Szasz operators,Complex Analysis and Operator Theory,DOI 10.1007/s11785-016-0538-3(2016),1–10.
[10]P.Maheshwari,On modified Srivastava-Gupta operators,Filomat,29(6)(2015),1173–1177.
[11]P.Maheshwari,Saturation theorem for the combinations of modified Beta operators inLpspaces,Appl.Math.E-Notes,7(2007),32–37.
[12]P.Maheshwari,An Inverse result in simultaneous approximation of modified Beta operators,Georgian Math.J.,13(2)(2006),297–306.
[13]P.Maheshwari and D.Sharma,Approximation byq-Baskakov-Beta-Stancu operators,Rend.Circ.Mat.Palermo,61(2012),297–305.
[14]R.S.Phillips,An inversion formula for semi-groups of linear operators,Ann.Math.,59(2)(1954),352–356.
[15]H.M.Srivastavaand V.Gupta,A certain family of summation integral type operators,Math.Comput.Model.,37(12-13)(2003),1307–1315.
[16]D.K.Verma and P.N.Agarwal,Convergence in simultaneous approximation for Srivastava-Gupta operators,Math.Sci.,6(22)(2012),doi:10.1186/2251-7456-6-22.
[17]D.V.Widder,The Laplace Transform,Princeton University Press,Princeton 1941.
杂志排行
Analysis in Theory and Applications的其它文章
- On Weighted Lp−Approximation by Weighted Bernstein-Durrmeyer Operators
- A Struwe Type Decomposition Result for a Singular Elliptic Equation on Compact Riemannian Manifolds
- On an Axiomatic about Functional Means
- Commutators of Singular Integral Operators Related to Magnetic Schrdinger Operators
- Some Generalized q-Bessel Type Wavelets and Associated Transforms
- On Quasi-Chebyshevity Subsets of Unital Banach Algebras