人性化护理干预对提升新生儿舒适度的影响分析

陈素香

人性化护理干预对提升新生儿舒适度的影响分析

The impact of humanistic nursing on promoting the comfort of newborns

陈素香

CHEN Suxiang.

Department of Neonatology, Luohu Maternal and Child Care Service Center, Shenzhen 518001, China

目的 研究人性化护理干预对提升新生儿舒适度的影响。 方法 选取2013年5月-2014年5月在妇产科出生的新生儿122例进行研究，按照随机数字表法将新生儿分为对照组和观察组各61例。对照组新生儿给予常规护理，观察组新生儿给予人性化护理。分析新生儿哭闹特点，比较2组护理前后新生儿的每日哭闹次数、睡眠时间及2组护理后新生儿的疾病相关指标。 结果 2组新生儿的哭闹特点主要为响亮婉转及惊哭，但2组哭闹情况比较，差异无统计学意义。护理后观察组新生儿每日哭闹次数显著少于对照组(t=9.491,P=0.000)，SpO2及睡眠时间显著好于对照组(t=9.604,P=0.000; t=6.072,P=0.000)。观察组新生儿护理后的病情改善时间、监护病房住院时间以及疾病康复时间均分别显著少于对照组。 结论 人性化护理干预措施可较好地减少新生儿哭闹，促进新生儿尽快康复。

婴儿，新生；人性化护理；舒适度

Objective To study the impact of humanistic nursing on promoting the comfort of newborns. Methods A total of 122 newborns delivered between May 2013 and May 2014 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group (n=61) and a control group (n=61). The control group was given routine nursing care, while the observation group was provided with humanistic nursing. The characteristics of the newborns′ crying were analyzed before the intervention. The everyday crying numbers, the sleeping time and diseases of both groups were compared before and after the intervention. Results No significant differences were found in the crying of the two groups before the intervention. The number of crying in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=9.491,P=0.000), while the SpO2and sleep time were significantly better than those in the control group (t=9.604,P=0.000,t=6.072,P=0.000). The time for the babies to get better, recover and stay in ICU of the former group was significantly shorter than the latter. Conclusion Humanistic nursing can effectively reduce neonatal crying and promote the rehabilitation of newborns as soon as possible.

Babies, newborn; Humanistic nursing; Comfort

518001 广东深圳，深圳市罗湖区妇幼保健院新生儿科

·临床护理·

儿科护理

10.3969/j.issn.1674-3768.2016.02.018