Advances in drug delivery system for platinum agents based combination therapy

2015-12-29XiangKangHaiHuaXiaoHaiQinSongXiaBinJingLeSanYanRuoGuQi

Cancer Biology & Medicine 2015年4期

Xiang Kang, Hai-Hua Xiao, Hai-Qin Song, Xia-Bin Jing, Le-San Yan, Ruo-Gu Qi

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China;2State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China;3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;4Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China;5Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai 200025, China

Xiang Kang1, Hai-Hua Xiao2,3, Hai-Qin Song4,5, Xia-Bin Jing2, Le-San Yan2,3, Ruo-Gu Qi2,3

Platinum-based anticancer agents are widely used as first-line drugs in cancer chemotherapy for various solid tumors. However, great side effects and occurrence of resistance remain as the major drawbacks for almost all the platinum drugs developed. To conquer these problems, new strategies should be adopted for platinum drug based chemotherapy. Modern nanotechnology has been widely employed in the delivery of various therapeutics and diagnostic. It provides the possibility of targeted delivery of a certain anticancer drug to the tumor site, which could minimize toxicity and optimize the drug efficacy. Here, in this review, we focused on the recent progress in polymer based drug delivery systems for platinum-based combination therapy.

Cancer; drug delivery; combination therapy; platinum

Introduction

Platinum-based anticancer agents are widely used as first-line drugs in cancer chemotherapy for various solid tumors, such as testicular cancer, bladder cancer, ovarian cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), melanoma, and lymphomas1,2. Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloplatinum, CDDP) is the first approved platinum drug that has been used for more than three decades in standard chemotherapy regimens3. Due to the low concentration of chloride, cisplatin is hydrolyzed inside the cell and converted to the highly reactive species [Pt(NH3)2Cl(OH2)]+, which forms 1,2-GpG intrastrand adducts with DNA. The adducts inhibit transcription and replication of DNA, ultimately leading to cellular apoptosis4-6. However, the use of cisplatin is restricted because of its severe side effects, including nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, and myelo-suppression, as well as the intrinsic and acquired resistance developed by various cancers7-12. For this reason, improved Pt-based anticancer drugs that display mitigated side effects and are able to overcome one or more resistance mechanisms have been developed13,14. Carboplatin, oxaliplatin, nedaplatin, lobaplatin, and heptaplatin that have similar structure to cisplatin are now clinically used (Table 1)25. In addition, new types of compounds, such as prodrugs [platinum (IV)] that can be directly reduced to Pt(II) in the cancer cells26and multinuclear and intercalating complexes, show promising advantages both in vitro and in vivo27,28. Nevertheless, side effects and occurrence of resistance remain the major drawbacks for nearly all the developed Pt drugs. To solve these problems, new strategies should be adopted for Pt drug-based chemotherapy.

The first strategy is combination therapy described as the simultaneous administration of two or more pharmacologically active agents with different mechanisms. Combination therapy has long been adopted as a primary cancer treatment regimen29. Compared with single-drug therapy, combined therapy iscapable of reducing drug resistance by targeting different signal pathways30. Moreover, this approach may offer higher therapeutic efficacy via synergistic effects than the single-drug therapy31. However, different drugs vary in solubility, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and membrane transport mechanisms; hence, designing dosage and schedule of regimen are difficult. Furthermore, these different drugs sometimes bring even more serious side effects. In particular, almost all of the Pt drugs used in clinics nowadays share similar mechanism of action as DNA cross linking agents. Table 2 lists various Pt-based combination regimens used in clinics for multiple targets in the cancer cells.

The second strategy is the use of nanotechnology. Modern nanotechnology has been widely employed in the delivery of various therapeutics and diagnostics32-36, thereby providing the possibility of targeted delivery of a certain anticancer drug to the tumor site to minimize toxicity and optimize drug efficacy37,38. Nanoparticle delivery system can improve drug solubility, reduce systemic toxicity, increase blood circulation time, enhance cell uptake, and provide controllable release profiles38-41. Moreover, the system can even deliver the drugs to selective cancer cells either by taking advantage of enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) or by specific bimolecular recognition between nanoparticles and cells42,43. Nanoparticle delivery system for single drugs has been successfulwith pioneer examples, such as Abraxane and Doxil. The drugs are currently used in clinics. Nonetheless, single-drug therapy is rarely used in clinical practice because combination therapy is more compelling, as previously described29. However, the real challenge for combination therapy is reproducing the in vitro synergy effect in vivo because different drugs have different metabolism profiles. The drug ratio resulting in synergy in vitro may not translate to synergy in vivo because the combined drugs are transported into the tumor cells differently, making it a barrier for ideal combination therapy. Nonetheless, nanoparticle has the ability to simultaneously encapsulate/conjugate one, two, or multiple drugs at a desirable drug ratio. Furthermore, combined drugs can be delivered to the ultimate target at the initial ratio with minimal leakage because the nanoparticles protect the drugs44. Hence, scientists around the world develop nanoparticle drug delivery systems for combination chemotherapy.

Table 2 Most commonly used Pt-based combination regimens suggested by NCCN

Specifically, numerous drug delivery carriers, such as polymer, solid lipid and inorganic nanoparticles, have been developed over the years for the delivery of single Pt drugs. Thus, much improvement has been made in this field44. For example, polymer-Pt(II) conjugates, such as AP5280 (cisplatin) and AP5346 (oxaliplatin), entered phase II clinical study45,46. NC-6004, the polyglutamic acid-Pt(II) drug developed by Kataoka is now used in clinics, as well as in a phase II study in Japan and in a phase III study in the USA47. A more advanced example is lipoplatin, which has successfully completed a phase III trial for non-small cell lung cancer in 201048,49. Developments in single Pt drug delivery system have been successful. Meanwhile, these drug carriers are also developed for Pt-based combination therapy. This review focuses on the recent progress in polymer-based drug delivery systems for Pt-based combination therapy.

Polymeric drug delivery system for Ptagent based combination therapy

General combination strategy

The general combination strategy for free drugs is relatively simple. The delivery of a specific drug, however, can be either conjugated or encapsulated. Moreover, the drug conjugate in aqueous solution can either form nanoparticles or not. Table 3 summarizes the general combination strategies and their advantages and drawbacks with consideration of the complexity of the drug delivery system.

Pt(II)-based combination

Drug sensitizers are commonly employed, including the combination of paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin (DOX), 5-FUand gemcitabine, and Pt agents such as oxaliplatin, cisplatin, or carboplatin, to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy, combination therapies of Pt(II) agents, and other agents, e.g., anticancer drugs.

Table 3 General combination therapy strategy for two anticancer drugs

Epirubicin has been widely used for several cancer types2. NC-6300 is an epirubicin-containing micelle in which epirubicin is covalently bound to polyaspartate block copolymer through an acid-labile hydrazone bond with a diameter of 40 to 80 nm, as shown in Figure 1A50. As described above, NC-4016 is a polyethylene glycol-poly (glutamic acid) block copolymer, PEG-P (Glu) micelle formed via complex of DACHPt, and carboxyl groups in the polymer side chains (Figure 1B). NC-6300 and NC-4016 micelles are combined and compared to the free drug combination of oxaliplatin and epirubicin (E/O) in 44As3Luc cells and in vivo xenografts51. The combined two nanoparticles display highly synergistic effect equivalent to E/O. In vivo, the nanoparticle combination generates greater antitumor activity in the subcutaneous tumor model, which results in longer life span of the animals, compared with the free drug combination. Furthermore, the nanoparticle combination has less cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity, which can be beneficial for future clinical trials.

Apart from the combination of two separate micelles, incorporating multi-components in one regimen has become very common in clinical practice. Therefore, the combination of two or more cytotoxic anticancer agents in one nanoscale delivery platform for cancer chemotherapy becomes fascinating. Lee et al.52proposed a way of co-packaging doxorubicin and cisplatin in a single polymer caged nanobin (PCN). This PCN had a doxorubicin-encapsulated liposomal core and a pH-responsive cisplatin prodrug loaded polymer shell. Moreover, the drug ratio, surface charge, and zeta potential in the PCN can be adjusted. PCN showed stronger synergy than the free drug combination (Figure 2A) and extensively enhanced the overall cytotoxicity. This example demonstrated the future potential of nano-platform for multi-drug combinational delivery.

Li et al.53reported that pH-responsive cisplatin prodrug crosslinked polysaccharide-based nanoparticles. These nanoparticles were developed from succinic acid decorated dextran (Dex-SA) for loading and triggered intracellular release of DOX (Figure 2B). Further crosslinking the nanoparticles by Pt(II) agents resulted in crosslinked nanoparticles. Different from conventional crosslinking agent, cisplatin was used as crosslinking agents in the said study. The in vitro release experiment demonstrated that DOX could be released from the crosslinked nanoparticles in a controlled/pH-dependent manner. The crosslinked nanoparticles had a relatively longer blood circulation half-life than free doxorubicin and uncrosslinked nanoparticles. Consequently, in vivo, the DOX-loaded CL-nanoparticles exhibited enhanced therapeutic efficacy in tumor-bearing mice compared with the non-CL-nanoparticles and free DOX, which were further confirmedby the histological and immunohistochemical analyses. These cisplatin prodrug crosslinked polysaccharide nanoparticles proved to be a promising nanomedicine drug delivery system for tumor-targeted delivery of DOX.

Figure 1 Representative drug combinations of two drug loaded nanoparticles. (A) Combined NC-6003 (epirubicin). (B) NC-4016 (oxaliplatin) micelles.

Thereafter, Dex-SA-DOX-CDDP nanoparticles were tested in three colorectal and breast mouse tumor models, namely, subcutaneous colorectal carcinoma xenograft, dimethylhydrazine induced autochthonous colorectal and metastatic mammary carcinoma54. These animal models could well mimic the pathological and immunological responses triggered by tumors in patients. The Dex-SA-DOX-CDDP nanoparticles inhibited the growth of CT26 xenograft tumors, possibly because of efficient tumor accumulation and penetration. More importantly, the life span was extended in an autochthonous colorectal carcinoma model. With the addition of iRGD, the growth and metastasis of 4T1tumors were retarded. Therefore, Dex-SA-DOX-CDDP could be an effective platform for the delivery of DOX.

Paclitaxel and cisplatin were extensively combined in clinics and called TP regimen, as listed in Table 2. As shown in Figure 2C, Song et al.55reported that a novel methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(L-glutamic acid)-b-poly (L-phenylalanine) [mPEG-b-P(Glu)-b-P(Phe)] triblock copolymer was prepared and explored as a micelle carrier for the co-delivery of paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin. PTX and CDDP were co-loaded into the micelles with the hydrophobic P(Phe) and P(Glu)-Pt block as the inner core and the PEG as the hydrophilic shell. In vitro drug release experiments showed that via cross-linking by CDDP, the burst release of PTX could be avoided. Moreover, this nanoparticle with both PTX and CDDP showed high synergy in the inhibition of A549 lung cancer cells over a 72 h period of drug incubation. In vivo, the PTX and CDDP co-loaded micelles demonstrated an obvious tumor suppression rate of 83.1%, which was significantly higher than that of free drug combination and single drug-loaded micelles. Moreover, this nanoparticle showed fewer side effects. Thus, the polypeptide-based combination of PTX and CDDP may provide useful guidance for effective and safe cancer chemotherapy.

The combination of two cytotoxic agents was introduced in the previous sections. With the possibility that two cytotoxic agents may cause more severe side effects, combining less cytotoxic agents (such as drug sensitizer, which has minimum toxicity and can sensitize the anticancer drug) may be more promising. The major drawback of Pt drugs is drug resistance. Notably, one of the major reasons for Pt drug resistance is GSH-mediated detoxification. Ethacrynic acid (EA), which is a GST inhibitor, is non-toxic and can reduce the conjugation of GSH with Pt agents to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy56. As shown in Figure 3, Yang et al.57prepared a polymer conjugate of EA and then constructed biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles to co-deliver both EA and DACHPt (a precursor of oxaliplatin) to overcome GSH-mediated detoxification. Yang et al.57first showed that the hybrid nanoparticles released EA and Pt fasterin lower pH values. The nanoparticles with both EA and Pt showed synergistic effect, resulting in a 4.6-fold increase in anticancer efficacy. In vivo study also supported the ideas of these researchers. The EA used in their study was nearly non-toxic. By utilizing its sensitizing effect, synergy can be also generated. This approach is different from combining two cytotoxic agents together, which might cause greater side effects.

Figure 2 Combination of two strong cytotoxic agents in one nanoparticle platform. (A) Doxorubicin and cisplatin prodrug were combined in a polymer-caged nanobin. (B) Cisplatin and doxorubicin were combined in dextrin-derivative polymer micelles. (C) Paclitaxel and cisplatin were combined in poly-peptide nanomicelles.

Pt(IV) based combination

Pt(IV) drugs, prodrugs of Pt(II) agents, are more stable and can result in less side effects. Pt(IV) drugs can be modified to possess sufficient lipophilicity for drug encapsulation or to gain functional groups for drug conjugation. Though numerous reports on Pt(II) based drug combinations in a polymer platform are available, Pt(IV) drug-based combination therapy in nanoparticles was relatively underdeveloped. A method for delivering cisplatin(IV) prodrug and paclitaxel by using composite micelles was designed by Xiao et al.58(Figure 4A). A cisplatin(IV) conjugate and a paclitaxel conjugate with the same biodegradable and amphiphilic block copolymer were synthesized and then co-assembled. The polymer-cisplatin(IV)conjugate had a Pt loading of 14% (w/w). The loading capacity of paclitaxel in the high polymer was 30% (w/w). By changing the ratio of the two conjugates, different proportions of Pt/PTX composite micelles were obtained. When the micelles entered the tumor cells, effective anticancer drug cisplatin(II) was released upon cellular reduction, and PTX was released by acid hydrolysis. Moreover, the composite micelles achieved synergy in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, the combination therapy could reduce systematic toxicity and enhance antitumor efficacy.

Figure 3 Combination of a cytotoxic platinum agent with a less cytotoxic drug sensitizer ethacrynic acid to minimize the glutathione mediated Pt detoxifcation. (A) Chemical structure of P(Pt) and P(EA). (B) Schematic illustration of self-assembling P(Pt) and P(EA) into M(EA/Pt) and its intracellular fate. (C) In-vivo evaluation of tumor inhibition effect of M(EA/Pt). (D) In-vivo evaluation of body weight change after treatment of M(EA/Pt).

Figure 4 Combination of two cytotoxic agents in one nanoparticle platform. (A) Polymer-cisplatin (IV) conjugates and polymer-paclitaxel conjugates were mixed to prepare micelles with both cisplatin and paclitaxel for combinational drug delivery. (B) Polymer-cisplatin (IV) conjugates were used to encapsulate docetaxel for combinational drug delivery.

A self-assembled polymeric nanoparticle (NP) platform developed by Kolishetti et al.59was used to reach the targeted tumor cells and precisely control the co-delivery of drugs with varying physicochemical properties (Figure 4B). Cisplatin and docetaxel (Dtxl) were delivered to prostate cancer cells with synergistic cytotoxicity. By preparing a polylactide (PLA) derivative with pendant hydroxyl groups and conjugating it to a Pt(IV) prodrug, a new functionalized polymer c,t,c-[Pt(NH3)2(O2CCH2CH2COOH)(OH)Cl2] [PLA-Pt(IV)] was obtained. This polymer was mixed with carboxyl-terminated poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymer in the presence or absence of Dtxl in microfluidic channels. Through this reaction, a new polymer with 95% encapsulation efficiency (EE), 5% loading of the hydrophilic Pt(IV) drug, 80% EE, 1% loading of hydrophobic Dtxl, and a diameter of 100 nm was successfully synthesized. The surface of these nanoparticles was modified with the aptamer A10 group, which could be specifically targeted to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on prostate cancer cells. These nanoparticles could undergo controlled release of both drugs over a period of 48-72 h. The nanoparticles with targeting moieties were internalized into the PSMA-expressing LNCaP cells, and the formation of cisplatin 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-links was found. The in vitro toxicity experiments showed that the dual drug combined with target group was better than that of single drug nanoparticles or non-targeted NPs. This work reveals the possibility of combining two drugs in a single polymeric nanoparticle drug delivery system to treat tumors.

In the previous section, the combination of two cytotoxic agents was achieved either by mixing two separate drug conjugates or encapsulating a second drug with the polymer-drug conjugate of the first drug. This strategy could easily formulate nanoparticles with two drugs at a desirable ratio. However, this approach cannot ensure that the exact ratio of the drugs combined will remain unchanged during circulation because premature leaking of one drug might occur. Pt(IV) prodrugs have six coordinated positions, which can be utilized to attach other molecules, including anticancer drugs, drug sensitizers, imaging agents, and targeting ligands. Multifunctional Pt(IV) prodrugs with other anticancer drugs or drug sensitizers at a precise ratio can be designed for combinational therapy. These multifunctional Pt(IV) agents can be intracellularly reduced to release Pt(II) agents and the attached molecules.

As shown in Figure 5A, Aryal et al.60designed a multifunctional Pt(IV) agent with both cisplatin and paclitaxel in the same molecule for combination therapy. In this Pt(IV) molecule, paclitaxel and cisplatin were loaded at a precise ratio of 1:1. Moreover, the hydrophobicity of the molecule easily rendered encapsulation into lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles with controllable drug loading and desirable drug release profiles. The cytotoxicity of the multifunctional Pt(IV) drugs loaded nanoparticles on ovarian cancer cells was further evaluated in comparison with un-encapsulated free drug conjugates. The results demonstrated that encapsulation of the drug conjugate could greatly enhance cytotoxicity, possibly because of the facilitation of the intracellular entry of the amphiphilic drug conjugates across the lipid bilayer structured cellular membranes.

Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is recognized as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer61. Traditional Chinese medicines, such as cantharidin or its derivative demethylcantharidin (DMC), are potent PP2A inhibitors62. Combination of PP2A inhibitors with other chemotherapy drugs, such as Pt agents, generated synergy. As shown in Figure 5B, Zhou et al.63designed multifunctional Pt(IV) agents containing cisplatin and DMC (complex 1 in Figure 5B). Instead of being encapsulated with free carboxylic acid group into nanoparticles, this drug conjugate was conjugated to biodegradable polymer to prepare a polymer-(tandem drugs) conjugate drug delivery system (DLS size: 200-240 nm). The tandem drug delivery system has the following advantages: (I) precise ratio control of drugs delivered, which is hardly achieved by other methods; (II) simultaneous release of two drugs; and (III) high chance of reproducing the in vitro synergy in vivo. The designed polymer-(tandem drugs) conjugate was believed to act in a dual mode, i.e., reduction and release of Pt(II) agents could target the intracellular DNA, resulting in DNA double strand crosslinks and releasing DMC-induced DNA damages to bypass cell cycle checkpoints and lethal mitosis by inhibition of PP2A.

Similar multifunctional Pt(IV) drugs designed for drug delivery by our group are Z-DCA-Pt, S-DCA-Pt, and camplatin, which also showed their benefit of combination64-66.

Conclusion and future perspective

Figure 5 Ratio metric combination of two drugs in a multifunctional Pt(IV) prodrug. (A) Paclitaxel and cisplatin were combined in a Pt(IV) prodrug and encapsulated for drug delivery. (B) Norcantharidin and cisplatin were combined in a Pt(IV) prodrug and conjugated for drug delivery.

Pt agents comprise 50% of all anticancer drugs used in clinics and in 80% of clinical anticancer regimens as a single agent or combined with other anticancer drugs. The delivery system for Pt(II) drugs was relatively better developed than that for Pt(IV) drugs because several Pt(II) drug delivery systems entered different clinical phases. More work should be done to enhance the characteristics of Pt(IV) agents to maximize benefits and identify the best drug delivery system. Both Pt(II) and Pt(IV) drug-based combination delivery systems were relatively popular in research, but not in clinical trials. However, in present clinical practice, the combination of Pt agents with one or more anticancer drugs is prevalent. Different profiles of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and side effects would compromise the overall therapeutic outcomes of combination therapy. To resolve these problems, the transfer of this clinical combination in a drug delivery system may bring benefits despite the extremely challenging translation. The clinical benefits of combination therapy using nanoparticle platforms should be unambiguously demonstrated. Moreover, the superiority should be proven from the drug delivery rather than from the synergy generated by the parent drugs. Therefore, the advantages of delivering two or more drugs in one platform should be better than combining single drugs. The Pt drugs and their combinations are ubiquitous in clinical practice. Hence, the prospects of translation of the combination therapy into drug delivery system would be favorable.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

1. Shaili E. Platinum anticancer drugs and photochemotherapeutic agents: recent advances and future developments. Sci Prog 2014;97:20-40.

2. Available online: http://www.nccn.org/

3. Abu-Surrah AS, Kettunen M. Platinum group antitumor chemistry: design and development of new anticancer drugs complementary to cisplatin. Curr Med Chem 2006;13:1337-1357.

4. Chaney SG, Campbell SL, Bassett E, Wu Y. Recognition andprocessing of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2005;53:3-11.

5. Jamieson ER, Lippard SJ. Structure, recognition, and processing of cisplatin-DNA adducts. Chem Rev 1999;99:2467-2498.

6. Kelland L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:573-584.

7. McWhinney SR, Goldberg RM, McLeod HL. Platinum neurotoxicity pharmacogenetics. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:10-16.

8. Schweitzer VG. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: the effect of pigmentation and inhibitory agents. Laryngoscope 1993;103:1-52.

9. Gonçalves MS, Silveira AF, Teixeira AR, Hyppolito MA. Mechanisms of cisplatin ototoxicity: theoretical review. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:536-541.

10. Arany I, Safirstein RL. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Semin Nephrol 2003;23:460-464.

11. Stojanovska V, Sakkal S, Nurgali K. Platinum-based chemotherapy: gastrointestinal immunomodulation and enteric nervous system toxicity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2015; 308: G223-232.

12. Heffeter P, Jungwirth U, Jakupec M, Hartinger C, Galanski M, Elbling L, et al. Resistance against novel anticancer metal compounds: differences and similarities. Drug Resist Updat 2008;11:1-16.

13. Lovejoy KS, Lippard SJ. Non-traditional platinum compounds for improved accumulation, oral bioavailability, and tumor targeting. Dalton Trans 2009;(48):10651-10659.

14. Lebwohl D, Canetta R. Clinical development of platinum complexes in cancer therapy: an historical perspective and an update. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1522-1534.

15. Aabo K, Adams M, Adnitt P, Alberts DS, Athanazziou A, Barley V, et al. Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists' Group. Br J Cancer 1998;78:1479-1487.

16. Harrap KR. Preclinical studies identifying carboplatin as a viable cisplatin alternative. Cancer Treat Rev 1985;12 Suppl A:21-33.

17. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2938-2947.

18. Giacchetti S, Perpoint B, Zidani R, Le Bail N, Faggiuolo R, Focan C, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of oxaliplatin added to chronomodulated fluorouracil-leucovorin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:136-147.

19. Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH, Berlin JD, Marshall JL, Ramanathan RK, et al. Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracilleucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracilleucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2059-2069.

20. Akaza H, Togashi M, Nishio Y, Miki T, Kotake T, Matsumura Y, et al. Phase II study of cis-diammine(glycolato)platinum, 254-S, in patients with advanced germ-cell testicular cancer, prostatic cancer, and transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. 254-S Urological Cancer Study Group. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992;31:187-192.

21. Alberto ME, Lucas MF, Pavelka M, Russo N. The secondgeneration anticancer drug Nedaplatin: a theoretical investigation on the hydrolysis mechanism. J Phys Chem B 2009;113:14473-14479.

22. Lobaplatin: D 19466. Drugs R D 2003;4:369-372.

23. Min YJ, Bang SJ, Shin JW, Kim DH, Park JH, Kim GY, et al. Combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and heptaplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2004;19:369-373.

24. Lee KH, Hyun MS, Kim HK, Jin HM, Yang J, Song HS, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of heptaplatin 1-hour infusion and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy comparing with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2009;41:12-18.

25. Wheate NJ, Walker S, Craig GE, Oun R. The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials. Dalton Trans 2010;39:8113-8127.

26. Chin CF, Wong DY, Jothibasu R, Ang WH. Anticancer platinum (IV) prodrugs with novel modes of activity. Curr Top Med Chem 2011;11:2602-2612.

27. Krause-Heuer AM, Grunert R, Kuhne S, Buczkowska M, Wheate NJ, Le Pevelen DD, et al. Studies of the mechanism of action of platinum(II) complexes with potent cytotoxicity in human cancer cells. J Med Chem 2009;52:5474-5484.

28. Brodie CR, Collins JG, Aldrich-Wright JR. DNA binding and biological activity of some platinum(II) intercalating compounds containing methyl-substituted 1,10-phenanthrolines. Dalton Trans 2004 Apr 21;-:1145-1152.

29. Pritchard JR, Lauffenburger DA, Hemann MT. Understanding resistance to combination chemotherapy. Drug Resist Updat 2012;15:249-257.

30. Fodale V, Pierobon M, Liotta L, Petricoin E. Mechanism of cell adaptation: when and how do cancer cells develop chemoresistance? Cancer J 2011;17:89-95.

31. Lehár J, Krueger AS, Avery W, Heilbut AM, Johansen LM, Price ER, et al. Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:659-666.

32. Wen Y, Liu W, Bagia C, Zhang S, Bai M, Janjic JM, et al. Antibody-functionalized peptidic membranes for neutralization of allogeneic skin antigen-presenting cells. Acta Biomaterialia 2014;10:4759-4767.

33. Saunders MJ, Liu W, Szent-Gyorgyi C, Wen Y, Drennen Z, Waggoner AS, et al. Engineering fluorogen activating proteins into self-assembling materials. Bioconjug Chem 2013;24:803-810.

34. Wen Y, Roudebush SL, Buckholtz GA, Goehring TR, Giannoukakis N, Gawalt ES, et al. Coassembly of amphiphilic peptide EAK16-II with histidinylated analogues and implications for functionalization of β-sheet fibrils in vivo. Biomaterials 2014;35:5196-5205.

35. Zheng Y, Wen Y, George AM, Steinbach AM, Phillips BE, Giannoukakis N, et al. A peptide-based material platform for displaying antibodies to engage T cells. Biomaterials 2011;32:249-257.

36. Balducci A, Wen Y, Zhang Y, Helfer BM, Hitchens TK, Meng WS, et al. A novel probe for the non-invasive detection of tumorassociated inflammation. OncoImmunology 2013;2:e23034.

37. Wen Y, Kolonich HR, Kruszewski KM, Giannoukakis N, Gawalt ES, Meng WS. Retaining antibodies in tumors with a selfassembling injectable system. Mol Pharm 2013;10:1035-1044.

38. Wen Y, Meng WS. Recent in vivo evidences of particle-based delivery of small-interfering RNA (siRNA) into solid tumors. J Pharm Innov 2014;9:158-173.

39. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med 2012;63:185-198.

40. Engman C, Wen Y, Meng WS, Bottino R, Trucco M, Giannoukakis N. Generation of antigen-specific Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells in vivo following administration of diabetes-reversing tolerogenic microspheres does not require provision of antigen in the formulation. Clin Immunol 2015;160:103-123.

41. Wen Y, Collier JH. Supramolecular peptide vaccines: tuning adaptive immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology 2015;35:73-79.

42. Dancey JE, Chen HX. Strategies for optimizing combinations of molecularly targeted anticancer agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5:649-659.

43. Galanski M, Keppler BK. Searching for the magic bullet: anticancer platinum drugs which can be accumulated or activated in the tumor tissue. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2007;7:55-73.

44. Hu CM, Aryal S, Zhang L. Nanoparticle-assisted combination therapies for effective cancer treatment. Ther Deliv 2010;1:323-334.

45. Rademaker-Lakhai JM, Terret C, Howell SB, Baud CM, De Boer RF, Pluim D, et al. A Phase I and pharmacological study of the platinum polymer AP5280 given as an intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3386-3395.

46. Campone M, Rademaker-Lakhai JM, Bennouna J, Howell SB, Nowotnik DP, Beijnen JH, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of AP5346, a DACH-platinum-polymer conjugate, administered weekly for three out of every 4 weeks to advanced solid tumor patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007;60:523-533.

47. Plummer R, Wilson RH, Calvert H, Boddy AV, Griffin M, Sludden J, et al. A Phase I clinical study of cisplatin-incorporated polymeric micelles (NC-6004) in patients with solid tumours. Br J Cancer 2011;104:593-598.

48. Farhat FS, Temraz S, Kattan J, Ibrahim K, Bitar N, Haddad N, et al. A phase II study of lipoplatin (liposomal cisplatin)/vinorelbine combination in HER-2/neu-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2011;11:384-389.

49. Mylonakis N, Athanasiou A, Ziras N, Angel J, Rapti A, Lampaki S, et al. Phase II study of liposomal cisplatin (Lipoplatin) plus gemcitabine versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine as first line treatment in inoperable (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010;68:240-247.

50. Harada M, Bobe I, Saito H, Shibata N, Tanaka R, Hayashi T, et al. Improved anti-tumor activity of stabilized anthracycline polymeric micelle formulation, NC-6300. Cancer Sci 2011;102:192-199.

51. Yamamoto Y, Hyodo I, Takigahira M, Koga Y, Yasunaga M, Harada M, et al. Effect of combined treatment with the epirubicinincorporating micelles (NC-6300) and 1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II)-incorporating micelles (NC-4016) on a human gastric cancer model. Int J Cancer 2014;135:214-223.

52. Lee SM, O'Halloran TV, Nguyen ST. Polymer-caged nanobins for synergistic cisplatin-doxorubicin combination chemotherapy. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:17130-17138.

53. Li M, Tang Z, Lv S, Song W, Hong H, Jing X, et al. Cisplatin crosslinked pH-sensitive nanoparticles for efficient delivery of doxorubicin. Biomaterials 2014;35:3851-3864.

54. Li M, Tang Z, Zhang D, Sun H, Liu H, Zhang Y, et al. Doxorubicin-loaded polysaccharide nanoparticles suppress the growth of murine colorectal carcinoma and inhibit the metastasis of murine mammary carcinoma in rodent models. Biomaterials 2015;51:161-172.

55. Song W, Tang Z, Li M, Lv S, Sun H, Deng M, et al. Polypeptidebased combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin for enhanced chemotherapy efficacy and reduced side-effects. Acta Biomater 2014;10:1392-1402.

56. Awasthi S, Srivastava SK, Ahmad F, Ahmad H, Ansari GA. Interactions of glutathione S-transferase-pi with ethacrynic acid and its glutathione conjugate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993;1164:173-178.

57. Yang Q, Xiao H, Cai J, Xie Z, Wang Z, Jing X. Nanoparticle mediated delivery of a GST inhibitor ethacrynic acid for sensitizing platinum based chemotherapy. RSC Adv 2014;4:61124-61132.

58. Xiao H, Song H, Yang Q, Cai H, Qi R, Yan L, et al. A prodrug strategy to deliver cisplatin(IV) and paclitaxel in nanomicelles toimprove efficacy and tolerance. Biomaterials 2012;33:6507-6519.

59. Kolishetti N, Dhar S, Valencia PM, Lin LQ, Karnik R, Lippard SJ, et al. Engineering of self-assembled nanoparticle platform for precisely controlled combination drug therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:17939-17944.

60. Aryal S, Hu CM, Fu V, Zhang L. Nanoparticle drug delivery enhances the cytotoxicity of hydrophobic–hydrophilic drug conjugates. J Mater Chem 2011;22:994-999.

61. Chen W, Wang Z, Jiang C, Ding Y. PP2A-mediated anticancer therapy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013;2013:675429.

62. Deng L, Dong J, Wang W. Exploiting protein phosphatase inhibitors based on cantharidin analogues for cancer drug discovery. Mini Rev Med Chem 2013;13:1166-1176.

63. Zhou D, Xiao H, Meng F, Li X, Li Y, Jing X, et al. A polymer-(tandem drugs) conjugate for enhanced cancer treatment. Adv Healthc Mater 2013;2:822-827.

64. Xiao H, Yan L, Zhang Y, Qi R, Li W, Wang R, et al. A dual-targeting hybrid platinum(IV) prodrug for enhancing efficacy. Chem Commun (Camb) 2012;48:10730-10732.

65. Song H, Xiao H, Zhang Y, Cai H, Wang R, Zheng Y, et al. Multifunctional Pt(IV) pro-drug and its micellar platform:to kill two birds with one stone. J Mater Chem B 2013;1:762-772.

66. Qi R, Xiao H, Wu S, Li Y, Zhang Y, Jing X. Design and delivery of camplatin to overcome cisplatin drug resistance. J Mater Chem. B 2015;3:176-179.

Cite this article as: Kang X, Xiao HH, Song HQ, Jing XB, Yan LS, Qi RG. Advances in drug delivery system for platinum agents based combination therapy. Cancer Biol Med 2015;12:362-374. doi: 10.7497/ j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0063

Le-San Yan and Ruo-Gu Qi

E-mail: lsyan@gmail.com and ruoguqi@gmail.com

Received August 12, 2015; accepted September 17, 2015.

Available at www.cancerbiomed.org

Cancer Biology & Medicine

2015年4期