Properties of Ultrafine Aluminum Powders Modified by Facile Grafting with Glycidyl Azide Polymer

-, -, -, -

(Institute of Chemical Materials, CAEP, Mianyang, 621999, China)

1 Introduction

Aluminum powders are widely used as additive in the field of energetic materials[1-3], due to its unique high calorific value and low cost. The application of ultra fine aluminum powders is always limited by (1) the agglomeration due to its high surface energy and strong particle interaction[4]; (2) easily oxidized by water[5-6]; (3) low compatibility with polymeric binders[7].

To address these problems,various approaches have been developed for the processing of aluminum powders[8-10]. Dave et al[11]studied the flowability of spherical aluminum powders processed by coating nano-particles of silica, titania and carbon black and promethyltrichlorosilane. Alexander Gromov et al[12]coated aluminum powders with nitrocellulose, oleic acid and stearic acid, which were suspended in kerosene and ethanol, amorphous boron, nickel, fluoropolymer, ethanol and air. Among these approaches, coating with oleic acid in ethanol showed best efficiency to protect aluminum from being oxidation, however, large amount of aluminum powders treated by oleic acid were still reacted during the aging test (after 50 min, over 30%(mass fraction) aluminum were consumed). Krasnoperov et al[13]coated aluminum powder with diameter of 30 μm with PVDF in super critical carbon dioxide, and aging test showed that it moderately protected the aluminum powders in aqueous solution (after 70 minutes, about 37% alumi-num was consumed). These

results indicate that physical coating is not well-proportional and the interaction between coating materials and aluminum particles is weak, which can not efficiently protect aluminum powders in high humidity. Besides physical coating, chemical grafting is another attractive route to coat aluminum powders with protective shells[14-17]. Charles Dubois et al[16]grafted 18% PE and 12% polyurethane onto 120 nm aluminum powders, aging test in water at 60 ℃ showed that it provided effective way to protect aluminum powders. However, grafting with large amount of passivative materials might bring problem to the energy releasing efficiency of aluminum powders in the application of energetic materials[18]. Recently, Anderson et al[18]reported that the type of binders (energetic or non-energetic) could have apparent effect on the early reaction of aluminum in the pressed aluminized explosives. GAP is unique energetic polymer with a heat of formation of +490.7 kJ·mol-1[19]. The terminated hydroxyl groups of GAP polymers can offer some convenient reactions, e.g. efficient reaction with —NCO group. On the other hand, there are hydroxyl groups on the surface of aluminum powders[16-17]. Therefore, GAP molecular can be grafted to the aluminum powders with diisocyanate as bridge via consecutive condensation reactions between —OH and —NCO groups.

In this paper, we report studies on the method of ultra fine aluminum powders with diameter of 1-2 μm treated by surface grafting with GAP polymers and the surface properties, compatibility with fluorine polymeric binders as well as the water oxidation-resistance ability of the GAP-grafted aluminium powders.

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials

Aluminumpowders with diameter of 1-2 μm were bought from Yuhong nano tech. (Guangzhou, China). It was dried for 10h under vacuum before use. The active aluminum content of the aluminum powders is 99.8%. Acetonitrile was purified by CaH2followed by distillation and used in fresh. Ditin butyl dilaurate (DBTDL, 95% solution) was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Toluene-2, 4-diisocyanate (TDI, 99%) was bought from Xiya agent (Chengdu, China). Glycidyl azide polymer (GAP) was kindly given from Liming Chemical Engineering Institute (Luoyang, China). The molar mass distribution of GAP was characterized by using gel permeation chromatography (Agilent GPC50). The conventional universal calibration with linear polystyrene standards was used. The elution agent used was THF and the flow rate was kept at 1.0 mL·min-1. The molecular mass (Mn) of GAP was 3600 g·mol-1, where the polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) was 1.6. Other reagents were used without further purification unless noted otherwise.

2.2 Methods

Surface grafting on aluminumpowders was conducted by using consecutive condensation reaction between —OH and —NCO groups, as shown in Fig.1. For a typical experiment, 5 g aluminum powders were dispersed in a flask with 50 mL acetonitrile assisted with ultrasonic processing. 0.6 g DBTDL was added to the flask under vigorous stirring in the presence of argon gas inlet. 4 g TDI was added to the flask and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 80 ℃ oil bath. Then the mixture was cooled down to room temperature, filtered and washed with acetonitrile. And then the mixture was transferred to a flask and dispersed in 50 mL acetonitrile. 0.6 g DBTDL was added to the flask under vigorous stirring in the presence of argon gas inlet. Then 5 g GAP was added to the flask and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at 80 ℃ oil bath. Then the mixture was cooled down to room temperature, filtered and washed with acetonitrile for 5 times. The products were dried in vacuum for 12 h and the GAP-grafted aluminum powders were obtained. The grafting amount of GAP on the aluminum powders determined by TG/DSC curve(in N2atmosphere) was 1.3%, corresponding to the mass loss from 200 ℃ to 550 ℃, which was due to the exothermic decomposition of GAP molecular[20].

Fig.1Surface grafting GAP onto aluminum powders

The morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (APOLLO 300, CAMSCAN).The surface properties of aluminum powders were investigated by measuring static water drop contact angle with the sessile drop method (SL 200B). The aluminum powders were pressed into Ф10 mm×2 mm pellet. Water was dropped onto the surface of pellet and the contact angle was recorded from photograph. To test the effect of surface grafting of GAP on the protection of aluminum from being oxidized by water, stability test for aluminum powders was conducted in water at 70 ℃. The conversion of aluminum was calculated by [Al]conv/[Al]total, where [Al]totalis the total active aluminum of the aluminum powders, [Al]convis amount of consumed active aluminum, which is calculated based on [Al]conv=27pV/RT, herein,p=1.01×105Pa,T=298 K,Vis the volume of released hydrogen from the reaction of aluminum and water as prolongation of time, which was measured by water drainage method.

3 Results and discussions

3.1 Surface properties

The surface property of the aluminum powders was studied by measuring static water contact angle on the surface of aluminum powders. The aluminum powders were pressed into Ф10 mm×2 mm pellet. Water was dropped onto the surface of pellet. It is clearly seen from Fig.2a that water can easily permeate the surface of the fresh aluminum powders pellet. The static water contact angle on the fresh aluminum powders is in a range of 0° and 25.7°. After surface grafting with GAP molecules, as shown in Fig.2b, water drop can steadily stay on the surface of the pellet, and the static water contact angle is 109.9°. It indicates that the surface property of aluminum powders can be significantly changed from hydrophilic to hydrophobic by a little grafting of GAP molecules due to the highly apolar azide groups of the GAP polymer chains. This change in surface property will lead to improvement of adhesion of aluminum powders by organic binders.

a. fresh aluminum surfaceb. GAP-grafted aluminum surface

Fig.2Photoes of static water contact angle measurement on different surface

The effect of surface modification on the compatibility of aluminum powders with the organic bindersis showed by preparation of aluminum/fluorine polymer composite. The fluorine polymer is chosen because it is widely used as polymeric binders in aluminized explosives. But it difficultly adheres onto the aluminum powders, due to large polarity difference between aluminum powders and fluorine polymers. In this work, the aluminum powders are mixed in fluorine polymer solutions, then the mixture is dropped into water, and the Al/fluorine polymer products is obtained by filtering water and organic solvents. As can be seen from Fig.3a, for the unmodified aluminum powders, it is hardly wetted and adhered by the fluorine binders. The SEM image clearly shows the aggregation of the aluminum powders and floated on the polymer film. For the GAP-grafted aluminum powders, the aluminum paticles disperse in the fluorine binders and form uniform aluminum/fluorine polymer composite. SEM image shows that high density of modified aluminum powders are homogeneously distributed in the fluorine polymer matrix (Fig.3b). The surface grafting of GAP not only effectively breaks up the aggregation of Al particles, but also improves the wetting characteristics at the phase interface with fluorine polymers.

a. fresh aluminum powdersb. GAP-grafted aluminum powders

Fig.3SEM images of aluminum/fluorine polymer composite with different aluminum powders

3.2 Stability in water

The results for stability test in water at 70 ℃ for the fresh aluminum powders, aluminum powders coated with 1.5% No. 70 wax, aluminum powders coated with 1.5% fluorine polymer and GAP-grafted aluminum powders are shown in Fig.4. The following observations can be made.

(1) The fresh aluminum powders were quickly reacted: 39.8% of active aluminum was oxidized after 15 min and 51.8% of activated aluminum was oxidized after 30 min.

(2) The conversion trends of the two physical coated samples, the wax coated aluminum and fluorine polymer coated aluminum are similar with the fresh aluminum powders, indicating that physical coating can not effectively prevent the oxidation of aluminum in hot water.

(3) Only 1.4% of GAP-grafted aluminum powders was reacted after 60 minutes, showing that the GAP-grafted aluminum powders have better water oxidation-resistance ability.

Fig.4Conversion of Al vs time for four kinds of aluminum powders by stability test in water at 70 ℃

4 Conclusion

(1)The surface of ultrafine aluminum powders is modified via grafting with GAP molecular.

(2) The static water contact angle is 0-25.7° for the fresh aluminium powders and 109.9° for GAP-grafted aluminium powders.

(3) The GAP-grafted aluminum powders exhibit good compatibility with fluorine polymers, which will provide a beneficial route for formulation of aluminum powders and strengthen of aluminum/polymer composites.

(4) GAP-grafted aluminum powders have better resistance to water oxidation. Only 1.4% of GAP-grafted aluminum powders are reacted after 60 min in water at 70 ℃, providing a potential route to produce aluminized explosive formulations in water.

Acknowledgement:Authors appreciate Mr.Bai Sen hu who works in Liming Chemical Engineering Institute for his kindly providing GAP agent in this work.

[1] Manner V W, Pemberton S J, Gunderson J A, et al, The role of aluminum in the detonation and post-detonation expansion of selected cast HMX-based explosives[J].Propellants,Explosives,Pyrotechnics,2012, 37: 198-206.

[2] Gash A E, Simpson R L and Satcher Jr J H, Aerogels and sol-gel composites as nanostructured energetic materials, aerogels handbook, advances in sol-gel derived materials and technologies[M]. Springer, 2011: 585-606.

[3] Cao W, He Z Q, Chen W H, et al, Measurement of afterburning effect of aluminized explosives by underwater explosion method[J].ChinJEnergMater, 2012, 20: 229-233.

[4] Peuker J M, Krier H, Glumac N, Particle size and gas environment effects on blast and overpressure enhancement in aluminized explosives[J].ProcCombustInst, 2013, 34: 2205-2212.

[5] Arkhipov V A, Korotkikh A G, The influence of aluminum powder dispersity on composite solid propellants ignitability by laser radiation[J].CombustFlame, 2012, 159: 409-415.

[6] Alexander B, Carrillo A and Yim K B, Novel Manufacturing Process Development and Evaluation of the High Blast Explosive PAX-3 with BDNP A/F and R8002 Plasticizers[C]∥NDIA Insensitive Munitions & Energetic Materials Technology Symposium, Tuscan, May 12, 2009.

[7] Anderson P, Balas W, Nocolich S, et al, Development, Optimization, and Application of Combined Effects Explosives[C]∥NDIA Insensitive Munitions & Energetic Materials Technology Symposium, Tuscan, May 12, 2009.

[8] Zhou Y and Wang H, An Al@Al2O3@SiO2/polyimide composite with multilayer coating structure fillers based on self-passivated aluminum cores[J].ApplPhysLett, 2013, 102: 132901.

[9] Abadjieva E, van der Heijden A E D M, and Creyghton Y L M, Paricle coating-a novel trend in energetic engineering[C]∥41st International Annual Conference of ICT, Karlsruhe June 29- July 02, 2010.

[10] Vorozhtsov A, Gromov A, Lerner M, et al, Characterization and analysis of Al nanoparticles passivated with organic layers for energetic applications[C]∥41st International Annual Conference of ICT, Karlsruhe June 29- July 02, 2010.

[11] Jallo L. J, Schoenitz M, Dreizin E L, et al, The effect of surface modification of aluminum powder on its flowability, combustion and reactivity[J].PowderTechnol, 2010, 204: 63-70.

[12] Gromov A, Ilyin A, Barth U F, et al, Characterization of aluminum powders: II. Aluminum nanopowders passivated by non-inert coatings[J].Propellants,Explosives,Pyrotechnics, 2006, 31: 401-409.

[13] Glebov E M, Yuan L, Krishtopa L G, et al, Coating of metal powders with polymers in supercritical carbon dioxide[J].IndEngChemRes, 2001, 40: 4058-4068.

[14] Atmane Y A, Sicard L, Lamouri A, et al, Functionalization of aluminum nanoparticles using a combination of aryl diazonium salt chemistry and iniferter method[J].JPhysChemC, 2013, 117: 26000-26006.

[15] Chung S W, Guliants E A, Bunker C E, et al, Capping and passivation of aluminum nanoparticles using alkyl-substituted epoxides[J].Langmuir, 2009, 25(16): 8883-8887.

[16] Dubois C, Lafleur P G, Roy C, Polymer-grafted metal nanoparticles for fuel applications[J].JPropulPower, 2007, 23: 651-658.

[17] Crouse C A, Pierce C J, and Spowart J E, Influencing solvent miscibility and aqueous stability of aluminum nanoparticles through surface functionalization with acrylic monomers[J].ACSApplMaterInterfaces, 2010, 2: 2560-2569.

[18] P E Anderson, P Cook, A Davis, et al, The effect of binder systems on early aluminum reaction in detonations[J].Propellants,Explosives,Pyrotechnics, 2013, 38: 486-494.

[19] Ang H G and Pisharath S, Energetic polymers: binders and plasticizers for enhancing performance[M]. First Edition, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. 2012.

[20] Pisharath S, Ang H GSynthesis and thermal decomposition of GAP-Poly(BAMM) copolymer[J].PolymDegraStab, 2007, 92: 1365-1377.