In vivo astrocyte reprogramming following spinal cord injury

Yannick N.Gerber,Florence E.Perrin

Harmful and helpful roles of astrocytes in spinal cord injury (SCI):SCI induce gradable sensory,motor and autonomic impairments that correlate with the lesion severity and the rostrocaudal location of the injury site.The absence of spontaneous axonal regeneration after injury results from neuron-intrinsic and neuron-extrinsic parameters.Indeed,not only adult neurons display limited capability to regrow axons but also the injury environment contains inhibitors to axonal regeneration and a lack of growth-promoting factors.Amongst other cell populations that respond to the lesion,reactive astrocytes were first considered as only detrimental to spontaneous axonal regeneration.Indeed,astrocytes,that form the outer layer of the glial scar,play a predominant mechanical role as a barrier to axonal regeneration.However,evidence also attests to the beneficial functions of astrocytes after SCI.For instance,the glial scar barrier also limits the spread of inflammation and the extension of the lesion.Following SCI,astrocytes undertake significant molecular changes.We have earlier identified in mice that approximately 10% of resident mature astrocytes located in the vicinity of the lesion site naturally transdifferentiate into a neuronal phenotype (Noristani et al.,2016).Besides,SCI-induced converted astrocytes display an augmented expression of a neural stem cell marker,fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (Fgfr4)(Noristani et al.,2016).FGFR (including FGFR4)is crucial during neuronal differentiation and FGF4,a ligand of FGFR4,is essential for astrocyte dedifferentiation into neural stem cells.Thus we recently,investigated whether increasing SCIinduced Fgfr4-upregulation within astrocytes may improve recovery and tissue preservation(Bringuier et al.,2023).We first showed an increased βIII-tubulin expression in astrocytes resulting from lentiviral-mediated astrocytic Fgfr4 over-expression.RNAseq analysis of converted astrocytes (astrocytes expressing βIIItubulin) revealed a concomitant upregulation of neurogenic pathways and downregulation of Notch signaling.Both mechanisms are consistent with astrocyte-to-neuron conversion.Second,using open field and CatWalk® behavioral analysis,we highlighted that the enhancement of Fgfr4 specifically in astrocytes just after a lateral hemisection of the spinal cord improves motor recovery in mice.Interestingly,we observed that Fgfr4 over-expression-induced improvements are sex-dependent for fine motricity.We also observed a better gross motor function recovery in females as compared to males.This sexually dimorphic response correlates with a decrease in lesion volume in females conversely to males.We then concentrated our histological investigations on females only and we show that caudal to the lesion,Fgfr4 over-expression preserves myelin and reduces glial reactivity (Bringuier et al.,2023).

In vivo reprogramming of astrocytes in physiological and pathological circumstances:Astrocyte conversion into neurons may compensate for neuronal death and/or limittissue structure alteration.Both mechanisms may participate in the repair of impaired functions in pathological conditions (see review in Janowska et al.,2019).In vivoenforced differentiation of embryonic stem cells or reprogramming of glial cells into neurons using transcription factors and morphogens was achieved in several physiological and pathological contexts.However,glial cells conversely to embryonic stem cells,do not require several stages of differentiation since glia and neurons derive from common progenitors (reviewed in Janowska et al.,2019).It had been thus emphasized that targeting glia for cell conversion instead of stem cells may limit tumorigenesis risk (Janowska et al.,2019).In vivoreprogramming of glial cells into neurons had been investigated for almost 20 years.After a T8 lateral spinal cord hemisection in adult mice,astrocyte conversion into doublecortin-positive cells was induced by enforced lentiviral-mediated Sox2 astrocytic expression.Approximately 5% of resident astrocytes converted to DCX+/βIII-tubulin+neuroblasts further gives rise to mature neurons(Su et al.,2014).In a recent follow-up investigation using cervical dorsal hemisection of the spinal cord,enforced Sox2 expression in NG2 cells induced conversion into neuroblasts and eventually into neurons (Tai et al.,2021).Importantly,it also reduced glial scarring and promoted functional recovery (Tai et al.,2021).Therefore,in central nervous system injury,converting reactive astrocytes had been achieved through enforced expression of ectopic genes or fate-determining transcription factors that are not naturally expressed by astrocytes.Tumorigenesis risks had been associated with the delivery/induction of broad transcription factors (such as c-myc,Klf4,or OCT3/4) involved in cell reprogramming that may represent oncogenic factors (reviewed in Janowska et al.,2019).Consequently,targeting a gene,that is endogenously over-expressed by SCI,such as Fgfr4,may decrease the risk of tumorigenesis and/or induction of detrimental cell conversion as compared to transcription factors.Indeed,transcription factors may induce less specific effects due to their broader role.Interestingly,the conversion of astrocytes in other cell types than neurons also led to beneficial effects.In a mouse model of demyelination,astrocytes had been converted into oligodendroglia using miR-302/367.miR-302/367 is involved in many biological processes including cell proliferation,cell differentiation and reprogramming and maintenance of pluripotency in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.This resulted in an enhancement of remyelination and functional recovery (Ghasemi-Kasman et al.,2018).Likewise,continuous intrathecal delivery of the epidermal growth factor Neuregulin-1 converted reactive astrocytes into oligodendrocyte lineage cells,promoted remyelination,and improved motor function recovery in a rat model of SCI (Ding et al.,2021).

The transcription factorDLX2had been recently shown to induce the differentiation of astrocytes into induced neural progenitor cells that further differentiate into multilineage cells in the adult rodent brain (Zhang et al.,2022).First,the authors demonstrated that DLX2 induces neurogenesis from resident astrocytes.Indeed,2 and 3 weeks after astrocytic lentiviral mediated expression of DLX2,a large number of cells expressed the induced neural progenitor cells marker ASCL1+(achaete-scute family BHLH transcription factor 1).Four weeks after induction,ASCL1+-cells further became neuroblasts expressing doublecortin(DCX).Twelve weeks after injection,DCX+cells eventually differentiated into GABAergic neurons.Second,astrocytes-derived induced neural progenitor cells gave rise to glial cells.Indeed,by 12 weeks after injection,half of DLX2-induced cells converted into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.Studies remain to be done to understand the role of DLX2 in astrocyte reprogramming.However,it seems that DLX2 resembles the regulation of key genes during adult neurogenesis more than embryonic neurogenesis (Zhang et al.,2022).Along this line,the DLX2 homeobox genes had been reported as participating in the regulation of GABAergic neuron phenotype.Therefore,DLX2 enhancement in the context of central nervous system injury,in particular SCI,is an attractive strategy to elicit the reprogramming of astrocytes not only into neurons but also into oligodendrocytes that may promote remyelination at a later stage after injury.Additionally,the suppression of Notch signaling seems to be mandatory for DLX2-induced reprogramming into neurons (Zhang et al.,2022).This is consistent with previous findings,including ours (Bringuier et al.,2023),demonstrating that a down-regulation of Notch is necessary for neuronal differentiation.Besides,the time window of reprogramming is an important parameter.Astrocytes have been acknowledged for their beneficial role at an early stage after injury and it had then been already suggested that converting astrocytes into neurons(Janowska et al.,2019) or oligodendrocytes at a later stage after injury represents an attractive strategy.It would indeed preserve and prolonged astrocytic early beneficial role after injury.Moreover,the highly inflammatory environment observed early after injury may be not optimal to convert astrocytes-to-neurons conversely to a later time window.Based on our work,Fgfr4 overexpression at subacute or even chronic stages may be a good strategy since we observed an SCIinduced upregulation of Fgfr4 mRNA up to 2 weeks and of FGFR4 protein expression up to 6 weeks after lesion (the latest time points investigated)(Noristani et al.,2016).

Sex influence on astrocytic response after injury:Several studies have identified sexual dimorphisms in astrocytes both in physiological and pathological conditions.However,only very few studies concentrated on sex difference in the astrocytic response to an injury.Following traumatic brain injury either an increased astrogliosis was reported in males only (Villapol et al.,2017) or an increased astrocytic reactivity associated with a lower hypertrophy was observed in females as compared to males (Jullienne et al.,2018).After traumatic brain injury,the proportion of astrocytes expressing the C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 was higher in males (Acaz-Fonseca et al.,2015).Interestingly,we observed a sexdependent response to the overexpression of the astrocytic expression of Fgfr4 after SCI.Only females displayed an improvement in gross motor function and fine motricity recovery was sexdependent (Bringuier et al.,2023).This may either reflect a global sex-dependent response to SCI or an intrinsic difference in the astrocytic response.Consistent with the latest hypothesis,a sexual dimorphism had been observed in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the brain stem with a higher expression of FGFR2 and FGFR4 in females than in males (Chen et al.,2020).

In vivocytotherapy through astrocyte reprogramming into different cell types including neurons and oligodendrocytes has been achieved via the modulation of small molecules,genes,transcription factors,and microRNAs (Figure 1).In SCI and other disorders,challenging studies remain to be done to understand the mechanisms of endogenous and induced astrocyte reprogramming.Also,the identification of optimal time windows,which may vary on the type of converted cell,may permit to develop longitudinal therapeutic strategies.Finally,physiological and pathological environments are governed by a sexual dimorphism this is thus essential to investigate possible sex-dependent responses to astrocyte modulation.

Figure 1｜In vivo reprogramming of astrocytes after spinal cord injury: present and perspectives.

This work was supported by the patient organizations “Verticale”(to YNG and FEP).

Yannick N.Gerber,Florence E.Perrin*

MMDN,University of Montpellier,EPHE,INSERM,Montpellier,France (Gerber YN,Perrin FE)Institut Universitaire de France (IUF),Paris,France(Perrin FE)

*Correspondence to:Florence E.Perrin,PhD,florence.perrin@umontpellier.fr.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7630-0515(Florence E.Perrin)

Date of submission:April 12,2023

Date of decision:June 8,2023

Date of acceptance:June 20,2023

Date of web publication:July 20,2023

https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.380893

How to cite this article:Gerber YN,Perrin FE (2024)In vivo astrocyte reprogramming following spinal cord injury.Neural Regen Res 19(3):487-488.

Open access statement:This is an open access journal,and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License,which allows others to remix,tweak,and build upon the work non-commercially,as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Open peer reviewers:Giacomo Masserdotti,Ludwig-Maximilians University,Germany;Feng-Quan Zhou,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,USA.

Additional file:Open peer review reports 1 and 2.