Study of structure-property relationship of semiconductor nanomaterials by off-axis electron holography

Luying Li , Yongfa Cheng Zunyu Liu Shuwen Yan Li Li Jianbo Wang, Lei Zhang, and Yihua Gao

1Center for Nanoscale Characterization & Devices, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

2School of Physics and Technology, Center for Electron Microscopy, MOE Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- and Nano-Structures,and the Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

3Ministry-of-Education Key Laboratory for the Green Preparation and Application of Functional Materials, Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Organic Chemical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China

Abstract: As the scaling down of semiconductor devices, it would be necessary to discover the structure-property relationship of semiconductor nanomaterials at nanometer scale. In this review, the quantitative characterization technique off-axis electron holography is introduced in details, followed by its applications in various semiconductor nanomaterials including group IV, compound and two-dimensional semiconductor nanostructures in static states as well as under various stimuli. The advantages and disadvantages of off-axis electron holography in material analysis are discussed, the challenges facing in-situ electron holographic study of semiconductor devices at working conditions are presented, and all the possible influencing factors need to be considered to achieve the final goal of fulfilling quantitative characterization of the structure-property relationship of semiconductor devices at their working conditions.

Key words: semiconductor nanostructure; structure-property relationship; off-axis electron holography; electrostatic potential;charge distribution

1.Introduction

On December 29 in 1959 at an American Physical Society meeting at Caltech, the physicist R. Feynman made a famous speech: There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom, which is considered as the idea headstream of nanoscience. As continuous scaling down of semiconductor devices, the whole semiconductor industry encounters more challenges including short-channel effects, increasing leakage current and instability, high power dissipation, to name a few[1]. While structural characterization of semiconductor nanomaterials and devices has been largely carried out at nanometer or even atomic scale[2–4], the related physical properties especially electric characteristics are still mostly relying on macroscopic measurements. Revealing the electrostatic properties at nanometer scale, and finally pursuing the mechanism of nanomaterials and nano-devices at their working conditions would be of great help to resolve the above challenges, which would be significant to the development of the whole semiconductor industry.

In 1931, E. Ruska set up the first real transmission electron microscope (TEM). Since then, TEM has experienced significant developments. In 1947, D. Gabor raised the concept of“holography” as a way to restore resolution of TEM due to imperfect lens[5]. Here, “holography” represents the whole message, which should include both amplitude and phase, and the latter is always lost in most conventional TEM techniques.However, the application of electron holography is not fully developed until the appearance of field emission sources in commercially available TEMs in 1970s[6]. Since then, electron holography has been largely utilized in characterizing structureproperty relationship of semiconductor nanomaterials.

In this review, we will mainly introduce the quantitative characterization of semiconductor nanomaterials by off-axis electron holography technique. This unique quantitative characterization technique would be described in details, followed by its applications in charge distributions of group IV semiconductor nanostructures, compound semiconductor nanostructures, and two-dimensional semiconductor nanostructures. Finally, a general discussion about advantageous and disadvantages of off-axis electron holography will be presented, together with future expectations about this technique. The final goal is revealing the working mechanisms of semiconductor nanomaterials and related devices at nanometer scale.

2.Principle of electron holography

Electron holography is an advanced electron-interference technique offering both amplitude and phase information of the exit electron wave. Although more than 20 approaches are possible for setting up electron holography[7],off-axis electron holography in TEM mode is widely used for easy setup and accessible image construction processes (In the following, “off-axis electron holography” is simplified as“electron holography”). This approach requires highly coherent electron beam, biased metal coated quartz fiber situated at one of the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) aperture, and charge coupled device (CCD) for digital recording.As sketched in Fig. 1[8], the highly coherent electron beam emitted from field emission gun is split into object wave and reference wave, while the object wave passes through the sample and carries extra phase information due to electrostatic fields or charge accumulations in the sample, the reference wave transmitting in the vacuum region allows creating the hologram and thus retrieving the phase information.The biprism causes overlap of the object and reference waves forming interference fringes, which can be recorded by CCD for further analysis.

Fig. 1. (Color online) (a) Sketch of off-axis electron holography including three important components: field emission gun, biprism and CCD camera. (b) The reconstruction process of a hologram: The Fourier transform of a hologram produces one center band and two conjugate side bands, one of which is selected and cut out. By applying an inverse Fourier transform, the corresponding amplitude image and phase image can be obtained[8].

The Fourier transform of the hologram gives one center band and two conjugate sidebands. The separation of the side bands is determined by the voltage applied to the biprism, and the distributed non-periodic intensities around the above spots are caused by electrostatic or magnetic fields in the sample. One of the two side bands is cut out and re-centered. A complex image is obtained by an inverse Fourier transform of the selected side band, and the complex wavefunction can be expressed by:

From which the phase and amplitude can be extracted according to the following formula:

whererandirepresent real and imaginary parts of the complex wavefunction,Aandφare amplitude and phase of the incident plane wave,μis a constant relating to beam coherence, microscope stability, and detector properties[9]. The amplitude image can be utilized to obtain local projected sample thickness applying the inelastic mean free path of the material for specific high voltage electrons[10], the phase image contains information about electrostatic potentials, electric fields or charge accumulations in the material.

If only electrostatic fields or charge accumulations are involved in the materials, and the electric fringing fields are neglectable close to the sample edges, which are the cases for most semiconductor nanomaterials, the relative phase shift as compared to the reference wave can be expressed by:

whereCEis a constant determined by the wavelength of incident electron beam,Vis the electrostatic potential including mean inner potential of the material and possible contributions from dopants, band structure engineering or intrinsic polarization fields,zdenotes the incident beam direction, andxis specific direction in the plane of specimen. If the sample properties are homogeneous through the thickness of the sample, and there is negligible electrostatic fringing field around the sample, Eq. (4) can be simplified asφ(x) =CEV(x)t(x). Heretis the projected sample thickness along the incident electron beam. After the electrostatic potentialVis obtained, the corresponding charge density can be calculated by Poisson equation. Thus, in order to obtain quantitative information of electrostatic fields or charge accumulations in semiconductor materials, one needs to ensure that the area of interest is close to vacuum, and accurately determine the projected local sample thickness.

The off-axis electron holography technique has found wide range of applications in semiconductors including semiconductor light-emitting diodes[8], metal–oxide–semiconductor transistors[11], semiconductor nanowires[12−14], quantum dots[15,16]and two-dimensional semiconductors[17]. The quantitative characterization of the spatial distribution of electrostatic potentials, electric fields and charges at nanometer scale provide valuable information for in-depth understanding of the structure-property relationship of semiconductor nanostructures.

3.Charge distributions measurement at the nanometer scale

3.1.Charge distributions of group IV semiconductor nanostructures

Group IV Ge/Si system with type II band alignment has been widely investigated as prominent candidate for device applications. Ge quantum dots (QDs) sandwiched in borondoped Si are grown by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE), and electron holography is applied to specific Ge QD to reveal charge distribution and related charge density. The result shows that holes accumulate near the base of the Ge QD. According to revised version of the formula: Vhole= φexcess/CEt,the potential produced by accumulated holes can be obtained via the measured excess phase shift φexcess. Since the holes are mainly confined under the Ge dot in the wetting layer, the local projected thickness is estimated as the size of the base of the pyramid-shaped Ge dot along the incident electron beam. Based on the obtained electric potential Vhole, the hole density can be calculated by using one-dimensional Poisson equationThe 25-nm-wide Ge QD confines about 30 holes, and the hole density is estimated to be 0.03 holes/nm3, as presented in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). The macroscopic capacitance-voltage measurement gives an average value of ~ 40 holes/dot, that agrees well with the value obtained by electron holography for specific Ge QD. The remaining difference exemplifies the significance of characterizing charges accumulated around nanoscale area of interests for heterogeneous semiconductor materials[18].

The epitaxial Ge/Si core/shell nanowires (NWs) oriented along <110> direction are grown on Si (111) substrate by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) following the vapor-liquid-solid growth mode. Electron holograms and high-angle annulardark-field (HAADF) STEM images are obtained from individual NWs. While the HAADF images provide accurate information of the projected thicknesses of the Ge and Si regions for the selected core/shell NW based on the fact the HAADF intensity is proportional to the projected thickness of the sample (Figs. 2(c) and 2(d)), quantitative electron holography characterization of the same NW indicates that holes are selectively distributed in the Ge core as extra positive phase shifts appear in the Ge core region (Figs. 2(e) and 2(f)). The corresponding hole density is about 0.4 ± 0.2 nm–3, which is one order of magnitude higher than that for Ge QDs, which proves the better charge confinement capability of one-dimensional NWs as compared to zero-dimensional QDs[13].

For in-situ electron holographic study of group IV semiconductor nanostructures, Gan et al. report the electrical properties of axial Si-Ge NW heterojunctions characterized by electron holography and atom-probe tomography (APT). While the APT measurement provides total dopant concentration profiles for B, P, and the unintentional dopant Ga, the quantitative characterization by electron holography reveals that the built-in potential offset is about 0.5 ± 0.6 V with the Ge side lower. Further in-situ biasing experiment combined with electron holography indicates that when the Si side is positively biased, the built-in potential increases with biasing voltages;when the Si side is negatively biased, the built-in potential is not much affected, as presented in Figs. 3(a)–3(e)[19].

Meanwhile, by combining in situ TEM holder for lithiation and electron holography technique, Gan et al. quantitatively characterizes the dynamic process of lithium ion insertion into Ge NWs. It is found that the Ge NW would turn into Ge/LixGe core/shell structure with increasing shell thickness during the lithiation process. As sketched in Fig. 3(f), the surface of Ge core is negatively charged, leading to lower mean inner potential of the Ge core as compared to theoretical values. On the other hand, the inner surface of the LixGe shell would be positively charged to maintain charge balance, and the remainder of the metallic LixGe shell is free of net charge.According to Fig. 3(g), the calculated phase shift profile based on this charge distribution model fits well to experimental data, which confirms the validation of the proposed charge distribution model[14].

Fig. 2. (Color online) (a, b) Electron hologram and phase image of specific Ge quantum dot sandwiched in Si substrates. The bottom of Ge dot shows extra positive phase shifts indicating holes accumulated in this region[18]. (c, d) HAADF image of a Ge/Si core/shell nanowire and the corresponding thicknesses of Ge core (blue) and Si shell (red) for the region indicated by a black-dotted arrow in (c). (e, f) Phase image of the same Ge/Si core/shell nanowire and corresponding phase shift line profile across the heterostructures labeled by a black dotted arrow in (e). Extra positive phase shifts appear in the Ge core region indicating hole accumulation in the Ge core[13].

3.2.Charge distributions of compound semiconductor nanostructures

The combination of zero-dimensional QDs and one-dimensional NWs show great prospects in various optoelectronic devices. InAs QDs decorating GaAs NWs are grown via metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). A polarization effect is clearly demonstrated at nanometer scale by electron holography: the n-type doped InAs QDs show large amount of free electrons accumulated at the dots apexes, while the GaAs NW core would accumulate holes to satisfy charge neutralization. As a result, a radial polarization field would form,which leads to changes in the band structure of the hybrid QDs/NW system, and allows more electron-hole recombinations in the QD regions. These results explain well the observed enhanced photoluminescence (PL) intensity after introducing InAs QDs to the GaAs NW surface (Figs. 4(a)–4(d))[20].

The embedded radial quantum wells (QWs) in semiconductor NWs would allow confined electronic states along radial direction and free movements along the growth direction of the NWs. Here, radial GaAs QWs (~ 6.6 nm in width) are embedded in AlGaAs NWs with nearly perfect lattice matching.According to the electron holographic results at Al0.4Ga0.6As/GaAs QW/Al0.2Ga0.8As heterostructures: a large number of electrons accumulate in the GaAs QW, and considerable holes distribute at GaAs/AlGaAs interfaces, which causes band bending at these interfaces (Figs. 4(e) and 4(f)). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the introduction of GaAs QW would lead to quantum confinement effect in this heterostructure, and the resultant changes in band gap explains well the observed blue-shift of the GaAs QW peak as compared to that of single GaAs NW in the corresponding PL spectra[21].

The configurations of QDs decorating NWs and core/shell NWs are combined forming InAs QDs decorating GaAs/AlAs core/shell NWs, which is expected to bring more benefits to applications in photoelectric devices. Quantitative characterizations by electron holography show considerable electrons distributing in the InAs QD apex region. Charges of reversed signs and close densities distribute at sequential interfaces due to type-I band alignment and energy band bending at the interfaces. Holes would distribute in NW core to maintain overall charge neutralization. The AlAs buffer layer would help adjust band structures of the hetero-interfaces with improved confinement of electrons, and facilitate InAs QDs growth on GaAs NWs with enhanced stability[22].

III-nitride semiconductor nanostructures have direct band gap, flexible band structure engineering, and strong polarization-related internal electric fields, which are promising for single-NW devices. GaN/AlN heterostructural NWs grown by plasma-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy are quantitatively studied by electron holography. The obtained potential profile shows obvious deviation of the AlN top region as compared to simulations, which could be attributed to positive charging of the NW under electron beam irradiation[23].

Serial research on GaN NWs byin-situelectron holography reveals that the width of the space charge (SC) layer is about 76 nm at static state, and varies between 68 and 91 nm corresponding to the saturated states under forward and reverse bias conditions, respectively. Based on the above measurements, the donor density of GaN NWs is estimated to be about 4.3 × 106cm–3[24]. It is found that strain can also affect the width of SC layer in GaN NWs. The strain field is applied on the GaN nanowire by a tiny scanning tunneling microscope (STM) unit. When GaN nanowires are loaded on the fixed Au electrode, the selected GaN nanowire can be strained by moving the STM tip. The width of the SC layer is measured to be 85 nm for the unstrained NW, and 60 nm for strained NW with 29% reduction, as shown in Fig. 5. The observed reduction would be attributed to decreased electron flow from GaN to Au electrode. First principle calculations indicate reduced band gap of strained GaN, leading to reduced difference between GaN NW and Au electrode in Fermi level[25]. Besides SC layer width, strain can also control the distribution of surface charges on single GaN NW. Byinsituoff-axis electron holography, the charges distributed on the outer and inner side surfaces of the bent NW show opposite nature. It is expected that the outer and inner surface of the NW are differently strained, leading to different Fermi levels, and free electron flow from the higher Fermi level to the lower Fermi level until a balance is reached[26].

Besides the above group III–V compound semiconductor nanostructures, group II–VI NWs as well as group II–VI/group III–V heterostructural light emitting diode (LED) device are also quantitatively studied at nanometer scale. The depletion length as a function of reverse bias voltage for ZnO NW with a Schottky contact is first measured by cathodoluminescence and voltage contrast experiments. As presented in Fig.6(a), electron holography characterizations combined with electricalin-situbiasing are carried out for comparison. Meanwhile, 3D calculations of the depletion width W using the Nextnano3 software are carried out (Fig. 6(b)), and the results indicate an active core diameter of 70–75 nm with an n-type doing level of 1018cm–3, and negative surface charges of density 2.5 × 1012cm–2, leaving a depleted surface region of around 36 nm, which is consistent with three-dimensional simulations[27].

Fig. 3. (Color online) (a, b) TEM image of an axially biased Si–Ge nanowire heterojunction, and the Ge side is grounded. (b) Electron hologram of the nanowire with +3 V bias on the Si side. (c) Corresponding phase image. (d) Potential line profile of the region indicated by a white arrow in(c), which show abrupt changes at positive bias, and comparatively much less variations at negative bias. (e) Corresponding I–V curve of the same nanowire[19]. (f) The sketch of the charge distribution model of the Ge/LixGe core/shell structure. (g) Experimental phase shift data (black dots) and the best fitting results based on the above charge distribution model (red dots)[14].

Fig. 4. (Color online) (a) Charge distribution profile across InAs QD decorating GaAs NW hetero-interfaces obtained from holographic reconstruction of the phase shifts across the InAs QD/GaAs NW interface. (b) Band structure induced charge redistribution of InAs QDs/GaAs NW heterostructures, which confirms accumulation of electrons at the dot apex and charges of opposite signs distributed at the hetero-interface. (c, d) PL spectra of InAs QDs/GaAs NW (red) and pure GaAs NW (black) for comparison[20]. Line profiles of (e) electrostatic potential and (f) charge density across the GaAs/AlGaAs QW/NW heterostructures[21].

Fig. 5. (Color online) (a) TEM image of specific straight GaN nanowire connected between two Au electrodes forming a closed electrical circuit.(b) Phase image of the straight GaN nanowire close to the M–S junction. (c) Phase shift line profile of the region labeled by a red line in (b), and the red line indicates average values of the phase shift profile. (d) TEM image of a bent GaN nanowire connected between two Au electrodes. (e)Phase image of the bent GaN nanowire at the M–S junction showing different phase contrasts along radial direction. (f) Phase shift line profiles along the red and green arrows, respectively. The red and green lines represent their average values[25].

Fig. 6. (Color online) (a) Potential profiles at –5, –10 and –15 V bias, respectively. The inset shows corresponding phase image. The solid arrow labels the nanowire core for phase profiling, and the two dotted arrows indicate the vacuum regions on either side of the nanowire for phase profiling. (b) 3D calculations of the depletion width W using the Nextnano3 software. The selection of doping level ND = 1018 cm–3 and surface charge density Ns = 2.5 × 1012 cm–2 (green triangles) gives the best fit to the experimental depletion widths obtained by electron holography (black diamond)[27]. (c, d) Electron holographic phase images of the p–n and p–i–n heterojunctions, respectively. (e, f) The corresponding electrostatic potential profiles of p–n and p–i–n heterojunctions, respectively[28].

Fig. 7. (Color online) (a) Electron hologram of MXene-MoS2 2D/2D heterostructure. (b) Corresponding charge density image. (c, d) Charge density line profiles corresponding to the white arrows labeled as (e) and (f), respectively[29]. (e) Electron hologram of MoS2/FeS2 heterojunction. (f) Corresponding charge density map and (g) electric field map. (h) Charge density line profile (black) and electric field line profile (red) corresponding to the region labeled by the red dotted arrow in (f) and white dotted arrow in (g), respectively[30].

Non-polar a-plane n-ZnO/p-AlGaN and n-ZnO/i-ZnO/p-Al-GaN heterojunction film LEDs are synthesized by MOCVD. Performance enhancement is clearly observed for the LED device by introducing the i-ZnO layer. Comprehensive structural characterizations indicate smaller ratio of lattice mismatch and lower strain level in the p–i–n heterojunction as compared to p–n heterojunction. Based on the reconstructed electron holographic results of the two types of LED heterostructures (Figs. 6(c)–6(f)), the introduced i-ZnO layer corresponds to a region with flat electrostatic potentials, which offers more chances for carrier movements, enhanced possibilities of exciton recombination, and ensures prominent electroluminescence properties[28].

3.3.Charge distributions of two-dimensional semiconductor nanostructures

The two dimensional (2D)/2D MXene/MoS2heterostructure is expected to show excellent microwave absorption performance. However, the synergistic effect of the two types of 2D material is still ambiguous. The MXene/MoS2composites are synthesized by hydrothermal reaction, and quantitatively analyzed by electron holography. The color change in the charge density map indicates overlap of MoS2nanosheets in local regions. In the charge density profile, the upward peaks correspond to accumulation of positive charges, and the downward peaks indicate distribution of negative charges, which would lead to strong interfacial polarization, as shown in Figs. 7(a)–7(d). Since charge accumulation often take place at the interfaces, and the MoS2nanosheets confined among multi-layered MXene would form large amount of 2D/2D heterostructural interfaces, the resultant strong interfacial polarization would highly enhance the microwave absorption performance[29].

Similar method is also applied to MoS2/FeS2heterojunction. Small FeS2nanopieces are grown on the surface of MoS2flakes by a facial hydrothermal method. The resultant charge density map and electric field map show obvious fluctuations. The charge density profile across the FeS2pieces indicates positive charges gathered on one side, and negative charges accumulated on the other side of the MoS2/FeS2interface forming local polarized field, as presented in Figs.7(e)–7(h). The abundant charges distributed at the interface would capture and convert the incoming electromagnetic wave energy into kinetic energy until resonance is achieved.Meanwhile, the strong polarized field (around 0.027 V/nm)would facilitate formation of local stray electric fields with multiple directions. The intrinsic dipole moment and the multi-directional stray electric field would be re-oriented along similar directions when they are excited by the propagating electromagnetic wave, which would form macroscopic polarization effect and consume the energy of incoming electromagnetic wave. Although there is currently no actual application, these local layered heterojunctions would facilitate the fabrication of highly efficient microwave absorption devices in the near future[30].

4.Conclusion

In this review, the structure-property relationships of various semiconductor nanostructures are quantitatively studied by off-axis electron holography technique, which can provide nanoscale electrostatic potentials, electric fields and charges at the interfaces of the hetero-structural semiconducting materials. The applications of off-axis electron holography to group IV, compound, and two-dimensional semiconductor nanostructures are systematically presented, focusing on the extraction of charge distributions at the hetero-interfaces and the underlying structure-property relationships.

Although off-axis electron holography is powerful in characterizing phase shift and related electrostatic properties in semiconductor nanostructures, some challenges and concerns still exist about the sample under study: firstly, the area of interest needs to be very close to vacuum, or the secondary image would overlap with the original one, making the phase reconstruction process almost impossible. If the area of interest is not so close to vacuum, we could make an indentation in the neighborhood by focused ion beam to deliberately introduce the vacuum region close to where we’re interested. Secondly, samples of poor conductivity are not suitable for electron holography analysis, since the incident electrons would accumulate on the sample surface forming strong fringing field, which would mess up the intrinsic electrostatic field that really matters. Coating a thin layer of carbon would alleviate this situation to some extent. Thirdly, the presence of native oxide on the sample surface and inactive dopants within the semiconducting material would also complicate the quantitative characterization of electrostatic fields since they would have different contributions to the overall phase shifts from that of the active dopants. To deal with this issue, one could clear the sample surface at low angles by low energy Ar ions as much as possible, and combine device simulations to determine the level of inactive dopants.Moreover, the application ofin situelectrical biasing would be other choice, which could determine the changes in depletion width and built-in potential as functions of the applied bias[16]. Fourthly, suitable sample thickness is critical to electron holography measurement. When the sample is too thin,the relative phase shift would be tiny since it is proportional to projected sample thickness; when the sample is too thick,the overall beam intensity and signal to noise ratio would be bad for quantitative analysis. Finally, to achieve great coherence of the incident beam, and good quality of the fringes to allow enough sampling of the phase, electron holography always requires high brightness of the field emission gun and high beam current. We have to make a balance between good beam coherence to form high quality holograms and less beam damage to the sample if we are willing to work with electron holography on beam sensitive materials.

While the static structural determinations have been successfully realized at atomic resolution thanks to the high brightness of the field emission gun with highly coherent current, the spherical aberration (Cs) corrector and monochromator with greatly improved information limit, it becomes also possible to quantify extreme small electrostatic fields and relate them with the crystal structures at atomic resolution by aberration-corrected electron holography[31]. The three-dimensional tomographic mapping of electrostatic fields and charge distributions is another research area of electron holography that is worth pursuing. It requires multiple electron holographic characterizations over a wide range of sample tilts with corresponding reference electron holograms. Although the projected sample thickness at large tilting angles might be too large to provide good signal-to-noise ratio, and holograms including local strong diffraction contrasts have to be discarded, the combination of electron tomography and holography is still a promising technique for acquiring threedimensional electrostatic properties of semiconductor materials[32].

Meanwhile, real-time observations are always the short slab of off-axis electron holography since it usually requires off-line processing. The development of faster computer system and rapid imaging system would make the near-realtime phase reconstruction possible in the near future. With technical improvement in thein-situsample holders, the quantitative characterizations of electric properties of semiconductor nanostructures under various stimuli byin-situelectron holography are largely reported, making evaluation of nanometer scale electric properties of semiconductor devices at their working conditions possible. However, obtaining quantitative electric properties at working conditions contains some complex issues. For example, the electric potential profile of reverse biased GaN-based LED is quite noisy as the fringes are prone to be deteriorated by electromagnetic interference[33]. Comparison between phase images of electrically biased Si p–n junction and images based on three-dimensional electrostatic potential simulations reveals large discrepancies, and the possible contributors include electrostatic fringing fields, surface charges, preparation damage of sample surface, and limited spatial resolution, among which the electrostatic fringing fields would increase with the applied reverse bias[34]. Thus, the quantitative characterization of electric properties of semiconductor nanostructures at working conditions require comprehensive consideration of all the possible factors that might affect accurate determination of local electrostatic potentials, and the final fulfillment of related characterizations at working conditions of the semiconductor devices would be the most desirable goal to achieve for the whole semiconductor industry.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51871104), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2019kfyRCPY074). L. Y. L. thanks Prof. David Smith, Prof.Martha McCartney, Prof. Jiangnan Dai, Prof. Xin Yan for their great support in related work.