斯图加特Anne Frank 学校和Heilbrunnen 学校自助餐厅

设计：hammeskrause architekten

学生类建筑最适合通过参与式程序进行建筑设计决策。不可否认的是，斯图加特Anne Frank 学校和Heilbrunnen 学校的新自助餐厅大楼已实现这一点。自助餐厅是大家共进午餐和举办学校活动的场所。从城市规划方面讲，得益于餐厅的定位，两座学校建筑在结构上和空间上实现成功整合。这也使得学校及其学生的不同教学重点能够满足社会对包容性的强烈需求。显然，在餐厅的设计过程中，这种参与式设计成为了综合性和参与性程序的核心方面。令人信服地是，这一点已经在屋顶封顶和墙壁围护的设计中得以实现。餐厅已成为两校互动融合共存的不言而喻、直观的标识和投影面。

新餐厅大楼位于校园通道区。从城市规划角度来看，这既是校园入口，也是校园的终点。校园的独特之处在于拥有几栋20 世纪60 年代的典型校舍。粗糙的外露混凝土护栏与棕色、厚边的热带木窗交替建造。屋顶平坦而又硬实。新餐厅并没有复制这一点，这也是希望通过现代化方式表达学校应积极追求多样性。餐厅原型将屋顶和墙壁整合为一个强大元素，与现有建筑形成强烈对比，从而为学生、教师和当地居民在灰色、混杂的郊区建筑结构中创造出巨大视觉冲击力。

在为期数月的密集联合研讨会中，两所学校的学生讨论了各种创意思路，并从中为新建筑制定了一个获得普遍认可的色彩理念。这个实践设计流程由美术老师陪同，建筑师主持。

在研讨会中提出的“野餐用花圃”想法无需修改便可实施。由四种不同颜色的铝瓦组成的屋顶非常醒目，象征着学校和有着不同天赋的学生们跳动的心脏。“有所作为，让世界更美好”，已经成为餐厅传递给孩子们的核心信息。

整座建筑明亮而轻盈，屋顶墙体构件横跨餐厅和功能厅，且无任何支撑。面朝学校的全玻璃山墙是另一吸引点，引导着学生大胆进入。由于向东朝向，餐厅内部和校园融为一体。室内装修及其构件也促进了这一空间联系。墙壁和屋顶上特意设置的开口让阳光倾斜而入，进来的人们也可以将餐厅一看到底。

There are few projects in which decision-making on the building design through a participatory procedure is more appropriate than in building for pupils.This has undeniably been achieved with the new cafeteria building for the Anne Frank School and the Heilbrunnen School in Stuttgart.The cafeteria is the place for joint lunches and school functions.In terms of urban planning,the cafeteria is positioned so that it succeeds in integrating both school buildings structurally and spatially via the shared schoolyard.This also allows the different pedagogical focuses of both schools and their pupils to meet the intense social demand for lived inclusion.Hence it obviously follows that precisely this involvement in the design process for the cafeteria can be a central aspect of an integrative and participatory procedure.This was convincingly achieved for the design of the envelope covering the roof and the wall.It became the self-evident and intuitive identification and projection surface for the interactive merging and coexistence of both schools on the campus.

The new cafeteria building is located in its access area.In terms of urban planning,it forms both the entrance and the end of the schoolyard.The campus is characterised by several school buildings typical of the 1960s.Rough exposed-aggregate concrete parapets alternate with brown,thick-profiled ribbon windows made of tropical wood.The roofs are flat and hard.Not replicating this in the design of the new cafeteria is due to the desire for a contemporary expression of the positive and enriching diversity that a school should facilitate.Its archetype,combining roof and wall into one strong element,deliberately contrasts with the existing buildings,thereby creating a robust visibility for the new,vibrant building block in the grey,heterogeneous suburban fabric for the students,the teachers and the residents of the district.

In a number of intensive,joint workshops held over a period of several months,the pupils of both schools developed and discussed ideas and variants,from which they elaborated a generally approved colour concept for the new buildingshell.This hands-on design process was accompanied by the art teachers and moderated by the architects.

The idea of a“flower meadow for a picnic”developed in the workshops could be implementedwithout any changes.This one,jointly designed layer of four differently coloured aluminium shingles is a symbol for the pulsating heart of both schools and the pupils with their very different talents.Realising that you can make a difference,that you can contribute to making the world a“better place”has become the central message for the children.

Bright and light,the roof-wall element spans the dining and function hall without any supports.Its fully glazed gable opens up the cafeteriatowards the campus as an inviting gesture.Due to its eastward orientation,the interior and the schoolyard merge into one another.The interior fit-out and its elements support this spatial connection.Deliberately positioned openings in the walls and roof allow daylight to enter and direct the eye to the outside.