Efficacy towards negative symptoms and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review

Junjie WANG, Yingqun ZHOU, Hong GAN, Jiaoyan PANG, Hui LI*, Jijun WANG*, Chunbo LI

•Systematic review and meta-analysis•

Efficacy towards negative symptoms and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review

Junjie WANG, Yingqun ZHOU, Hong GAN, Jiaoyan PANG, Hui LI*, Jijun WANG*, Chunbo LI

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment; schizophrenia; negative symptoms;systematic review; meta analysis

1. Background

Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder with an unknown etiology and negative symptoms are one of the most difficult areas in the treatment of schizophrenia.[1,2]The classic first generation of antipsychotic drugs has little treatment effect on negative symptoms and the second generation of antipsychotics also fails to show better treatment effect on negative symptoms.[3,4]Recent research has also been looking for a combined medication method such as antidepressants acting on the 5-HT system,anticholinergic drugs, glycine regulatory drugs,antiepileptic drugs and central stimulants, as well as others for treating negative symptoms. However, the research results were inconclusive.[5]Non-drug therapy such as psychotherapy also failed to show efficacy for treating negative symptoms.[6]Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new technique of cerebral cortex stimulation developed in recent years.1.5 ~ 2 Tesla magnetic pulses can pass through the skull without attenuation and produce induction currents in the neural tissues of the superficial layers of the cerebral cortex. This current, as a result, affects the function of the nerve cells (excitatory or inhibitory)and induces therapeutic effect through the changes in neurotransmitter transmission of synaptic, local regional blood flow, nerve repair, and so forth.[7]

In basic research, it is believed that negative symptoms are mainly related to dopamine (DA), reduction of the function of noradrenaline, and the enhancement of the function of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT).[8]The dopamine hypothesis suggested that neural pathways hypofunction of the frontal cortex mediated mainly by the D1 receptor was related to the negative symptoms of patients.[7]Studies have shown that rTMS can cause changes in a variety of neurotransmitters including dopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine, glutamate, and so forth.For instance, animal and human experiments found that rTMS on the frontal lobe caused an increase in DA release in the basal ganglia and there was obvious influence on a variety of receptors such as 5-hydroxytryptamine as well as the gene expression that regulated neuronal excitability in different brain regions,[9]and it was speculated that the projection fibers (cortex- striatal fibers) from the cortex to basal ganglia could release DA.[10,11]High frequency magnetic stimulation has certain effect on the regulation of cerebral blood flow velocity.[12,13]Based on the results above, some scholars have explored the clinical effect of rTMS on negative symptoms. Cohen and colleagues reported the treatment of rTMS on negative symptoms. The study was a small open sample that showed a significant reduction in negative symptoms as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS) after 2 weeks of treatment with 20 Hz of rTMS(80% MT).[14]Up to now, there are already multiple parallel randomized controlled trials with relatively large sample sizes in addition to the relevant published systematic reviews, however, the results are still inconclusive. Some research suggested that rTMS failed to improve negative symptoms.[15-17]However, some research suggested that it could improve the efficacy of drug therapy.[18-20]And in the past few years there have been more controlled trials and clinical studies with larger sample sizes done using this new treatment mode.[21-26]Therefore, this study searched for randomized controlled trails (RCTs) that used rTMS for reducing the negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia in the published Chinese and English literature. Moreover, the results of these studies were systematically reviewed and analyzed by meta-analysis.

2. Methods

2.1 Search strategy

Electronic search: we searched in the following Chinese and English databases: Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Web of science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP,SINOMED, and Airiti Library. The English keywords used for search were schizophrenia, schizophrenia*,schizophrenic disorders, schizophrenic disorder,dementia praecox, negative symptoms, transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS, and rTMS. The Chinese

keywords were“重复经颅磁刺激”, “磁刺激”“经颅磁刺激”, “跨颅磁刺激”, “精神分裂症”,and“阴性症状 ”. The search deadline for the published

studies regarding randomized controlled trials of the rTMS treatment for the negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia was January 2, 2017. In the search process, we modified the search strategy and keywords according to the requirements of different databases.We hand-searched the reference lists of the included studies for the discovery of further related research. In addition, we consulted experts in this area as to whether there was any ongoing related research.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria of literature

This study included randomized controlled trials of rTMS treatment for the negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia, used the means of systematic review, and evaluated the efficacy and safety of rTMS in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

2.2.1 Study type

Inclusion of randomized controlled trials: Mock randomized controlled trial. For instance, there was a high risk of bias when implementation was done every other day. This systematic review would include this kind of study. Yet, sensitivity analysis was performed.With an unknown randomization method, cluster randomized and randomized crossover studies would also be included and sensitivity analysis was performed.

2.2.2 Study participants

Recognized psychiatric diagnostic criteria: (a) The International Classification of Diseases (ICD), (b) the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM), and (c) the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorder (CCMD), diagnosed as schizophrenia.

2.2.3 Exclusion criteria

The following studies were excluded: (a) non-human studies; (b) narrative review and reporting studies; (c)non-placebo control; (d) research plan; (e) studies of repeated publication.

2.2.4 Intervention measures

(a) Intervention group

The intervention group could be one of the following situations: high frequency (the stimulation frequency higher than 1Hz) or low frequency (the stimulus frequency equal to or lower than 1Hz); the stimuli were placed on the left, right, or bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; rTMS could be combined with other interventions such as drug therapy, psychotherapy, and so forth.Single TMS pulse intervention or studies that had less than 1 week intervention time were excluded.

(b) Control group

The control group could be one of the following situations: rTMS mock stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), drug therapy, psychotherapy, and rTMS treatment with different parameters.

2.3 Literature screening and data extraction

The literature screening process of this study is shown in Figure 1. The literature search was performed independently by two researchers (Junjie Wang, Hong Gan) using the search terms in the electronic databases.All the documents retrieved were managed using EndNote X5 software. The literature was screened by two researchers (Yingqun Zhou, Hong Gan). The first step was to remove repeated studies. The second step was to screen the literature by browsing the literature titles and abstracts according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The third step was to read the full text of the selected literature and to confirm included studies by further screening of the literature according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. If the two search results were different, the two researchers reviewed the literature together and analyzed the reasons for the differences. If the opinions were still inconsistent, a third person (Jiaoyan Pang)would examine and make the final decision. The data extraction table was developed by two researchers (Hui Li, Junjie Wang) for data extraction and verification. The extraction contents included the research publication year, blind method, sample size, age, course of disease, baseline PANSS score evaluation, medication compliance, stimulation site, positioning method,stimulation frequency and intensity, total number of rTMS treatment, control group stimulation model,number of pulses, and the time of follow-up.

2.4 Quality evaluation of literature

Risk of bias evaluation: the RCTs included were assessed by two independent investigators (Yingqun Zhou, Junjie Wang) based on the risk of bias assessment method recommended by the Cochrane manual version 5.3.0. The specific contents included: (a)random sequence generation; (b) allocation concealment; (c)whether to use the blind method (blinding of the subjects and the treatment providers, blinding of the result evaluators); (d) incomplete results data; (e) other potential risks that affected authenticity. When there was discrepancy of options between the 2 researchers,a third person (Hui Li) would make the determination. If the assessment information was lacking, we contacted the corresponding author via e-mail.

Quality of evidence and grades of recommendation: based on the results of the main outcome indicators of the systematic review, the GRADE system recommendation grading method was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The quality of evidence grades were as follows: (a) high quality: further research was unlikely to affect the reliability of the efficacy evaluation results; (b) medium quality: further research was likely to affect the reliability of the efficacy evaluation results and was very likely to change the outcome of the evaluation; (c) low quality: further research was very likely to affect the reliability of the efficacy evaluation results and the evaluation outcome was very likely to change; (d) extremely low quality: the results of any efficacy evaluation were uncertain.

2.5 Outcome indicators

2.5.1. Main outcome indicators

Effectiveness was defined as improvement in negative symptoms. The final outcome assessment scales included in this study were the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the negative subscale of PANSS.[21]

2.5.2. Secondary outcome indicators

a) Acceptability: including any cause of drop-out.

b) Safety of rTMS: the differences of adverse effects between rTMS group and control group were compared including severe adverse effects such as epilepsy and mild adverse effects such as headache,dizziness, insomnia, irritation, discomfort or pain at stimulation site, facial spasm and so forth.

2.6 Statistical analysis

Rev Man 5.3 and Stata 14.0 statistical software were used for meta-analysis. For the extracted continuous and categorical variable data, the simple criteria for statistical analysis of parameters were used based on whether the variables are consistent with normal distribution. When the minimum value was 0, the meanvalue was larger than twice the standard deviation;if the minimum value was greater than 0, a normal distribution was determined when subtraction of the minimum value from the mean value[27]was larger than twice the standard deviation. The measurement data were expressed by the adoption of the combined effect as the standardized mean differences (SMD).Count data were shown by using relative risk (RR).The results of the combined calculation were shown in the forest plot. Heterogeneity test was done first.Studies with I2(variation statistics of the effect size caused by heterogeneity) < 50% and p ≥ 0.1 in Q test were regarded as having homogeneity; therefore, the fixed effects model was used. When I2> 50% or p<0.1 in Q test, it explained that actual heterogeneity existed in the study; therefore, the random effects model was used and the source of heterogeneity was analyzed. This study adopted the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool to evaluate different risk of biases.Subgroup analysis and meta regression analysis were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity based on the factors that might influence heterogeneity in the study. Funnel plot was used to analyze publication bias.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the literature search and screening

3. Results

3.1 Basic characteristics of the included literature

See figure 1 for the process of study inclusion. There were a total of 3500 articles retrieved using relevant search strategies in 5 English databases and 5 Chinese databases, where the articles were published before January 2, 2017. 1835 duplicate studies were removed at first with 1665 articles remaining. During the title and abstract screening phase an additional 1547 articles were removed. Finally, after reading the full text of the remaining 118 articles, we removed 86 of them and were left with 32 articles. However, because the study by Goyal and colleagues[28]merely provided the mean value, not the standard deviation, it was excluded as well. In addition, two studies by Hajak (2004)and Cordes (2010) were both excluded for providing change-from-baseline PANSS scores but not final scores.In the end, 29 articles[15-17,21-26,30-49]were included in this study for data analysis.

See table 1 for the characteristics of all final included studies. According to the PANSS, the judging standard was a score of 20 or higher on the symptomssubcale. Except for 7 of the studies,[16,26,29,30,32,35,48]the included patients with schizophrenia in most of the studies mainly had negative symptoms. Patients took antipsychotics before treatment and the original drug treatment was unchanged during the treatment process. Therefore, all the studies were combined with rTMS as a synergistic treatment. The time for followup was mostly 2 weeks after treatment. The smallest study sample size was 17 cases;[17]the largest was 117 cases.[24]The smallest mean age was 26 years[22]and the oldest was 56.[21]

Table 1. The basic characteristics of the included studies

Table 1. The basic characteristics of the included studies (continuted)

In terms of treatment parameters, the stimulation sites were the following: other than 2 studies, most of the studies used high frequency stimulation on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The stimulation site of the study of Garg and colleagues was the speech function in the cerebellum. Frequency of stimulation:most used high frequency stimulation, however, there were 5 studies[21,22,26,38,39]using transcranial magnetic stimulation with thet a burst stimulation. The course of treatment: 2 weeks, 3 weeks, or 4 weeks; other than Lange 2015[50]there was one study that had stimulation treatment daily. Except for the 2 studies by Gan,[22,42]other control groups used mock stimulation as the control study. Nevertheless, there were differences in method of mock stimulation. Most of them chose a mock stimulus coil or flipped the magnetic coil.

3.2 Research quality

The results of the quality assessment are shown in figure 2 and table 2. Only 7 out of the 29 studies did not describe the random sequence generation in detail resulting in a rating of “unable to determine”.[15-17,22,29,32,34]The method of random sequence generation was provided in 22 studies resulting in a rating of “low risk”. There were 15 studies[17,26,36,42,51] that described the specific implementation process of the blinded method for participants. Except the 3 studies[22,34,46]that did not describe the blinding of the evaluators, the evaluation of the negative symptom outcome indicators were assessed by the evaluators using the blind method in all other studies. The loss to follow-up bias in one study[26]was rated as “high risk” because the drop-out rate of this study was larger than 20% and the intentionto-treat analysis was not implemented. There were 5 studies[15,16,29,30,42]that reported incomplete data due to drop-out and adverse effects.

See figure 2 for the funnel plot of the main treatment efficacy outcome indicators given by the 29studies. The asymmetry of the funnel plot asymmetry may be due to publication bias, but there may also be other factors leading to the asymmetry.

Figure 2. Funnel plot of potential publication bias of the efficacy of antipsychotics combined with rTMS in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia

3.3 Treatment effect

In the 29 studies, only 1 study assessed the efficacy of the negative symptoms with the SANS scale.[33]Therest of the studies provided data from the PANSS-negative subscale, which included 1400 participants.The heterogeneity of the included studies was high. The random effect model was used when I2was 73%, SMD=-0.40, and 95%CI= -0.62~-0.18. As shown in figure 3, the efficacy of the synergistic rTMS treatment on negative symptoms in schizophrenia had a weak effect. According to the GRADE evaluation criteria, the overall evidence quality level for the primary outcome indicator, which was the improvement of negative symptoms at the end of the rTMS treatment, was “moderate”. See table 3.

Table 2. Risk of bias assessment based on the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for the 29 included studies

Heterogeneity of results may be due to differences across studies in patients’ negative symptom severityand differences in stimulation methods. Therefore,we used meta-regression to assess the relationship between the above factors and the source of heterogeneity. In addition, we also included age and course of disease as possible regulatory variables into the meta-regression model to analyze the effects of these two factors on heterogeneity. The results showed that, conducting separate meta-regression analysis on the above mentioned 4 factors, the regression model of the treatment efficacy and the baseline PANSS negative symptom score found that t=-2.23, p=0.035,indicating the severity of the negative symptoms were one of the sources of heterogeneity. After putting the severity of the negative symptoms into the meta regression model, the variance component of the study was reduced from 0.26 to 0.25, showing that 3.85% of the source of heterogeneity could be explained. The regression models of treatment efficacy, rTMS method,course of disease, and age respectively found t=0.89,p=0.381; t=1.20, p=0.245, and t=-0.38, p=0.709,indicating that the association of these 3 factors and heterogeneity among the studies were not statistically significant. After placing the four factors into the meta-regression model simultaneously, the variance component of the study was reduced from 0.26 to 0.19,showing that 26.92% of the source of heterogeneity could be explained. Figure 4 was the meta-regression analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD)of the rTMS combined with antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of negative symptoms and the baseline PANSS negative symptom score.

Figure 3. Forest plot of efficacy of antipsychotic drugs combined with rTMS in treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia

Table 3. Summary of the quality GRADE rating of different outcome indicators in randomized controlled trials and the meta analysis results of antipsychotic drugs combined with rTMS in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia

3.4 Acceptability

There were 28 studies that reported dropouts and the total sample size was 1492 cases. The heterogeneity of the studies was low. Fixed effect model was selected because I2was 0%. The analysis results showed that RR= 0.75, 95%CI= 0.49~1.15. As the group that used synergistic treatment for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, rTMS had no difference in the acceptability to the control group, as shown in figure 5.In addition, the GRADE evidence quality of the outcome indicator was rated as “low level”, as shown in table 3.

Figure 4. Meta-regression analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the TMS combined with antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of negative symptoms and the baseline PANSS negative symptom score

Figure 5. Efficacy of antipsychotic drugs combined with rTMS in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: drop outs

3.5 Adverse effects

There was no report of severe adverse events in all included studies. There were 19 studies which had mild adverse effect induced by rTMS. There were reports on the specific adverse effects of 1296 schizophrenic patients in addition to the reports on the total number of cases with adverse effects. The adverse effects reported included headache, dizziness, pain in the stimulated area, facial spasm, and insomnia. The meta-analysis of the results showed that rTMS for the treatment of negative symptoms had a higher incidence of adverse effects: RR= 2.20，95%CI= 1.53~ 3.18.Moreover, the heterogeneity was low (I2=0), as shown in figure 6. However, the evidence quality of these studies was rated as “low level” (table 3).

4. Discussion

4.1 Main findings

There were less treatment options for the negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia. Although there have been several systematic reviews that assessed the efficacy of rTMS treatment, the development of new treatment paradigms in recent years and the increase of studies with large sample sizes may have supplemented or changed the conclusions of the previous systematic reviews. The aim of this study was to evaluate and update the efficacy and safety of the rTMS treatment on negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

We screened 29 RCTs studies with major outcome indicators from both English and Chinese databases,including 12 English articles and 17 Chinese articles.The studies that had a large sample size and long course of treatment were mostly Chinese. Based on the meta-analysis results of 1440 cases, antipsychotic treatment combined with the rTMS treatment may improve the negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia. Based on the risk of bias assessment of a single study, the evidence quality GRADE rating of the primary outcome indicator (efficacy) was “moderate level”, meaning that the outcome indicator result was aweak recommendation for supporting the use of rTMS intervention. In terms of acceptability and adverse effects, rTMS had better acceptability and no serious adverse effect.

Figure 6. Adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs combined with the rTMS in treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia forest plot

4.2 Limitations

The quality of the RCT studies included in this systematic review was high. The evaluators were blinded. However,the heterogeneity of our main outcome indicators was high. Further meta regression analysis showed that the severity of negative symptoms when first entered into the group might possibly be the source of heterogeneity.In addition, differences in the rTMS treatment methods in the included studies such as the intensity of stimulation,the total number of pulses, and so forth, may also be a source of heterogeneity.

4.3 Implications

This study conducted evaluation of RCT studies of rTMS combined with antipsychotics in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, discovering that the use of rTMS had a relatively weak effect on the improvement of negative symptoms. Although its use had good acceptability, the treatment might induce adverse effects such as dizziness, headache,and so forth. For patients with schizophrenia who have persistent negative symptoms, the use of rTMS might be considered clinically. However, we should be cautious in the interpretation of the results due to the high heterogeneity of the studies. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal mode of treatment,such as stimulation frequency, stimulation intensity,duration of treatment, and total pulse number.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the translators and reviewers of this article.

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission research project (project code:20134282); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality project (project code:16411965000); Shanghai Hospital Development Center(SHDC12014111); Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders (13dz2260500)

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Junjie Wang and Hong Gan were responsible for the literature search.

Hong Gan, Yingqun Zhou, and Jiaoyan Pang were responsible for article selection.

Hui Li and Junjie Wang were responsible for data extraction.

Junjie Wang, Yingqun Zhou, and Hui Li were responsible for risk of bias assessment.

Junjie Wang and Hui Li were responsible for statistical analysis.

Hui Li and Junjie Wang were responsible for writing up the article.

Jijun Wang and Chunbo Li were responsible for planning and guidance.

Reference

1. Priebe S, Savill M, Wykes T, Bentall R, Lauber C,Reininghaus U, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of body psychotherapy in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a multicentrerandomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(11): vii-xxiii, 1-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta20110

2. Mantovani LM, Ferretjans R, Marcal IM, Oliveira AM,Guimaraes FC, Salgado JV. Family burden in schizophrenia:the influence of age of onset and negative symptoms.Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2016;38(2): 96-99.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2015-0082

3. Buckley PF, Stahl SM. Pharmacological treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: therapeutic opportunity or cul-de-sac? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;115(2): 93-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.00992.x

4. Stahl SM, Buckley PF. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia:a problem that will not go away. Acta Psychiatr Scand.2007;115(1): 4-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00947.x

5. Tsapakis EM, Dimopoulou T, Tarazi FI. Clinical management of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: An update. PharmacolTher. 2015;153: 135-147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.06.008

6. Priebe S, Savill M, Wykes T, Bentall R P, Reininghaus U, Lauber C, et al. Effectiveness of group body psychotherapy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia:multicentrerandomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry.2016;209(1): 54-61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.171397

7. Kole MH, Fuchs E, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Ebert U. Changes in 5-HT1A and NMDA binding sites by a single rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation procedure in rats. Brain Res. 1999;826(2): 309-312.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01257-3

8. Shaul U, Ben-Shachar D, Karry R, Klein E. Modulation of frequency and duration of repetitive magnetic stimulation affects catecholamine levels and tyrosine hydroxylase activity in human neuroblastoma cells: implication for the antidepressant effect of rTMS. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.2003;6(3): 233-241. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1461145703003493

9. Wassermann EM, Lisanby SH. Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A review.Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(8): 1367-1377.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00585-5

10. Keck ME, Welt T, Muller MB, Erhardt A, Ohl F, Toschi N, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the release of dopamine in the mesolimbic and mesostriatal system. Neuropharmacology. 2002;43(1): 101-109.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00069-2

11. Strafella AP, Paus T, Fraraccio M, Dagher A. Striatal dopamine release induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.Brain. 2003;126(Pt 12): 2609-2615.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg268

12. Franck N, O’leary DS, Flaum M, Hichwa RD, Andreasen NC.Cerebral blood flow changes associated with Schneiderian first-rank symptoms in schizophrenia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;14(14): 277-282

13. Vaiva G, Cottencin O, Llorca PM, Devos P, Dupont S, Mazas O, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow in deficit/nondeficit types of schizophrenia according to SDS criteria. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002;26(3): 481-485.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5846(01)00292-5

14. Cohen E, Bernardo M, Masana J, Arrufat FJ, Navarro V, Valls S, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of chronic negative schizophrenia: A pilot study.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67(1): 129-130

15. Holi MM, Eronen M, Toivonen K, Toivonen P, Marttunen M, Naukkarinen H. Left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull.2004;30(2): 429-434

16. Novak T, Horacek J, Mohr P, Kopecek M, Skrdlantova L,Klirova M, et al. The double-blind sham-controlled study of high-frequency rTMS (20 Hz) for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: negative results. Neuro Endocrinol Lett.2006;27(1-2): 209-213

17. Mogg A, Purvis R, Eranti S, Contell F, Taylor J P, Nicholson T, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Schizophr Res. 2007;93(1-3): 221-228. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.016

18. Hajak G, Marienhagen J, Langguth B, Werner S, Binder H, Eichhammer P. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia: A combined treatment and neuroimaging study. Psychol Med. 2004;34(7): 1157-1163

19. Jin Y, Potkin SG, Kemp AS, Huerta ST, Alva G, Thai TM, et al. Therapeutic effects of individualized alpha frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (alphaTMS) on the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(3): 556-561. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbj020

20. Prikryl R, Kasparek T, Skotakova S, Ustohal L, Kucerova H, Ceskova E. Treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Schizophr Res. 2007;95(1–3): 151-157.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.06.019

21. Zhen LN, Guo Q, Li H, Li CB, Wang JJ. [Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with different paradigms on the cognitive function and psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia patients]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao (Yi Xue Ban). 2012;44(5): 732-736. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2012.05.013

22. Gan JL, Chen ZX, Duan HF, Zhu XQ, Shi ZJ, Gao CY, et al. [A randomized controlled trial of a short pulsed transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of refractory negative symptoms of schizophrenia]. Zhong Hua Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi. 2014;47(3): 191-192. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2014.03.024

23. Xu Q, Zhang YQ, Cheng ZH. [Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia]. Zhong Hua Yi Xue Hui Di Shi Qi Ci Quan Guo Xin Wei Yi Xue Xue Shu Hui Yi Lun Wen Ji;2015. Chinese

24. Quan WX, Zhu XL, Qiao H, Zhang WF, Tan SP, Zhou DF, et al. The effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on negative symptoms of schizophrenia and the follow-up study. Neurosci Lett. 2015;584: 197-201.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.029

25. Garg S, Sinha VK, Tikka SK, Mishra P, Goyal N. The efficacy of cerebellar vermal deep high frequency (theta range)repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in schizophrenia: A randomized rater blind-sham controlled study. Psychiatry Res. 2016;243: 413-420. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.023

26. Tikka S K, Nizamie S H, VenkateshBabu G M, Aggarwal N, Das A K, Goyal N. Safety and efficacy of adjunctive θ burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to right inferior parietal lobule in schizophrenia patients with first-rank symptoms: A pilot, exploratory study.J ECT. 2017;33(1): 43-51. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000343

27. Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ. 1996;313(7066): 1200

28. Goyal N, Nizamie SH, Desarkar P. Efficacy of adjuvant high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia:preliminary results of a double-blind sham-controlled study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;19(4): 464-467.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/jnp.2007.19.4.464

29. Cordes J, Thünker J, Agelink MW, Arends M, Mobascher A,Wobrock T, et al. Effects of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on clinical global impression in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2010;177(1-2): 32-36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.014

30. Klein E, Kolsky Y, Puyerovsky M, Koren D, Chistyakov A,Feinsod M. Right prefrontal slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia: A doubleblind sham-controlled pilot study. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46(10): 1451-1454.doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00182-1

31. Fitzgerald PB, Herring S, Hoy K, Mcqueen S, Segrave R,Kulkarni J, et al. A study of the effectiveness of bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Brain Stimul. 2008;1(1): 27-32.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.001Barr

32. MS, Farzan F, Tran LC, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. A randomized controlled trial of sequentially bilateral prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(3): 337-346. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.003

33. Prikryl R, Ustohal L, PrikrylovaKucerova H, Kasparek T,Venclikova S, Vrzalova M, et al. A detailed analysis of the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind trial.Schizophr Res. 2013;149(1-3):167-173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.015

34. Rabany L, Deutsch L, Levkovitz Y. Double-blind,randomized sham controlled study of deep-TMS add-on treatment for negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28(7):686-690. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114533600

35. Dlabac-De Lange JJ, Liemburg EJ, Bais L, Renken RJ,Knegtering H, Aleman A. Effect of rTMS on brain activation in schizophrenia with negative symptoms: A proof-ofprinciple study. Schizophr Res. 2015;168(1-2): 475-482. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2015.06.018

36. Xu WJ, Jin Y, Huang YQ, Liu ZR, He H, Chen J. [Doubleblind control trial of alpha electroencephalogramguided transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for schizophrenia]. Zhongguo Lin Chuang Kang Fu. 2006;10(46): 22-24. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.46.012

37. LiuH, Li H, Liu R, Wang JJ. [The analysis of curative effect of negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients after the treatment of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimu-lation(rTMS)]. Xian Dai Dian Sheng Li XueZaZhi. 2008;15(03):134-137. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0458.2008.03.002

38. Zhang JJ, Zhang XK, Li H, Zhong XL, Cheng ZW, Liao LW, et al. [Double-blind randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2010;22(05): 262-265. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2010.05.002

39. Chen HY, Zhang ZJ, Wang JJ, Chen YM, Xiang ZQ, Shi SX, et al. [Effect of adjunctive treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on exploratory eye movements and negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients:arandomized,double-blind,sham-controlled study]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2011;23(4): 200-206. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2011.04.002

40. Ren YP, Zhou DF, Cai ZJ, Huang Q, Lu L, Chen Q. [Effects of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on refractory negative symptom of schizophrenia: A double blind, randomized controlled trial]. Zhongguo Xin Li Wei Sheng Za Zhi. 2011;25(02): 89-92. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.02.003

41. Duan HF, Gan JL, Zhu XQ, Cao LJ, Shi ZJ, Gao CY, et al.[Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for refractory negative symptom of schizophrenia]. Xinxiang Yi Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2013;30(11):895-897+901. Chinese

42. Gan JL, Duan HF, Cheng ZX, Shi ZJ, Gao CY, Liang XJ, et al. [Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on schizophrenia with refractory negative symptoms and brain-derived neurotrophic factor]. Zhongguo Shen Jing Jing Shen Ji Bing Za Zhi. 2014;12: 710-714. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3936/j.issn.1002-0152.2014.12.002

43. Zhao SH, Kong JH, Li SL, Tong ZS, Yang CJ, Zhong HQ.Randomized controlled trial of four protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry.2014;1: 15-21. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.01.003

44. Bai L, Gan JL, Liang XJ, Duan HF, Gao CY. [The effect of rTMS on DTI and the Negative Symptoms in patients with schizophrenia]. Zhongguo Jian Kang Xin Li Xue Za Zhi.2015;23(5): 649-653. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2015.05.003

45. Wang YF, Lv BJ, Teng JB, Xia Y. [Efficacy and safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the treatment of schizophrenia with negative symptoms].Zhejiang Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2015;4: 331-333+340. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1005-4561.2015.04.007

46. Zhang CH, Yu ZH, Zhang G, Yang GH. [Study on effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with ziprasidone in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia]. Zhongguo Xian Dai Yi Yao Za Zhi. 2015; 9: 26-28. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2015.09.008

47. Li Z, Du XD, Zhang LL, Yang JG, Yang L, Yin M, et al. [A control study of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic schizophrenia characterized by negative symptoms]. Lin Chuang Xin Shen Ji Bing Za Zhi. 2016;22(5): 28-31. Chinese.doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1672-187X.2016.05.011-0028-04

48. Ma SJ, Wu ZJ, Huang YQ, Lin LB, Gao ZS. [Clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on first-episod schizophrenia patients]. ZhongHua Lin Chuang Yi Shi Za Zhi (Dian Zi Ban). 2016;40(14): 2063-2067. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.14.007

49. Gan JL, Duan HF, Cheng ZX, Shi ZJ, Gao CY, Zhu XQ, et al.[Effectiveness and safety of high dose transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia with refractory negative symptoms: a randomized controlled study]. Zhong Hua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015;95(47): 3808-3812. Chinese. doi: http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2015.47.003

50. Dlabac-De Lange JJ, Bais L, Es FD, Visser BG, Reinink E,Bakker B, et al. Efficacy of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: results of a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2015;45(6): 1263-1275. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002360

51. Dlabac-De Lange JJ, Liemburg EJ, Bais L, Van De Poel-Mustafayeva AT, De Lange-De Klerk ESM, Knegtering H,et al. Effect of bilateral prefrontal rTMS on left prefrontal NAA and Glx levels in schizophrenia patients with predominant negative symptoms: An exploratory study.Brain Stimul. 2017;10(1): 59-64. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.08.002

52. Shi C, Yu X, Cheung EF, Shum DH, Chan RC. Revisiting the therapeutic effect of rTMS on negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2014;215(3):505-513. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.019

53. Lage C, Wiles K, Shergill SS, Tracy DK. A systematic review of the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognition. J Neural Transm (Vienna).2016;123(12): 1479-1490. doi: doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-016-1592-8

54. Dlabacde Lange J J, Knegtering R, Aleman A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(4): 411-418. doi: http://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.08r04808yel

55. Freitas C, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Meta-analysis of the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)on negative and positive symptoms in schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2009;108(1-3): 11-24. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.027

重复经颅磁刺激治疗对精神分裂症患者阴性症状的疗效和安全性：系统综述

王俊杰 周颖群 甘鸿 庞娇艳 李惠 王继军 李春波

重复经颅磁刺激治疗；精神分裂症；阴性症状；系统综述；meta分析

Background:Negative symptoms are one of the most difficult areas in the treatment of schizophrenia because antipsychotics are often less effective towards them. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) is a new technique for cerebral cortex stimulation and is believed to be a safe and promising method for the treatment of mental disorders. As the clinical research and new treatment models have increased in recent years, the efficacy towards negative symptoms and safety evaluation of rTMS treatment should also be updated.

Aims:To explore the efficacy and safety of rTMS in the treatment of negative symptoms for patients with schizophrenia.

Methods:We searched for relevant controlled clinical trials from the following databases: PubMed,EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI),VIP, Wanfang Data, SINOMED, and Airiti Library. The retrieval time went up to January 2, 2017. The research literature was screened according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After data extraction,statistical analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14. Quality evaluation was done on the included research articles. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was adopted for assessing risk of bias. The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system recommendation grading method was used as the reference standard.

Results:A total of 3500 articles were retrieved. In the end, there were 29 articles included in the metaanalysis with a total sample size of 1440. After the meta-analysis, it was found that the use of antipsychotic treatment combined with rTMS could improve the negative symptoms of patients (SMD=-0.40, 95% CI=-0.62~-0.18). Based on the bias of the efficacy evaluation assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, there were 6 studies rated as having “high risk of bias” and the rest were rated as “unable to determine”. According to the assessment, development and evaluation criteria of the GRADE classification,the evidence quality for the efficacy evaluation index was “moderate”. The acceptability of rTMS treatment was better (RR= 0.75, 95% CI= 0.49~1.15, based on the 1492 samples from the 28 studies), however, the patients who

the rTMS treatment had a higher rate of mild adverse effects (RR= 2.20, 95% CI=1.53~ 3.18, based on the 1296 samples from the 23 studies).

Conclusions:The use of the antipsychotic treatment incorporated with rTMS treatment can slightly improve the negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia and has better acceptability and fewer adverse effects. Nevertheless, there is publication bias in this study and the heterogeneity of the study is relatively high. Therefore, we need to be cautious when interpreting the results

[Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2017;29(2): 61-76.

http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217024]

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

*correspondence: Hui Li, Jijun Wang. Mailing address: 600 South Wanping RD, Shanghai, China. Postcode: 200030. E-Mail: Hui Li, lihuindyxs@163.com;Jijun Wang, jijunwang27@163.com

背景：阴性症状是精神分裂症治疗的难点之一，抗精神病药物对其疗效较差。重复经颅磁刺激（repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS）是一项新型脑皮质刺激技术，被认为是一项安全而有前景的精神障碍治疗方法，近年来临床研究及新的治疗模式增多，rTMS治疗阴性症状的疗效和安全性评价需要更新。

目标：探索rTMS治疗对精神分裂症患者阴性症状的有效性及安全性。

方法：我们从以下数据库搜索了相关的临床对照试验：PubMed、EMBASE、the Cochrane Library、EBSCO、Web of science、中国知网、维普、万方、中国生物医学文摘数据库、台湾学术文献数据库等数据库，检索时间截止于2017年1月2日。按照预先定好的纳入和排除标准筛选研究文献，提取数据后应用RevMan 5.3和 Stata 14.0对数据进行统计分析。对纳入研究进行质量评价，采用Cochrane 风险评估偏倚工具评估各种偏倚的风险性。结合GRADE (Grades of Recommendation,Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, GRADE) 系统推荐分级方法为参照标准，进行主要结局指标证据水平的分级。

结果：总共检索到3500篇文献，最终29篇文献纳入meta分析，合计样本量1440例。进行meta分析后发现，抗精神病药物治疗合并使用rTMS可改善患者的阴性症状（SMD=-0.40，95%CI=-0.62~-0.18）。根据Cochrane 风险评估偏倚工具对疗效的评估的偏倚进行评估，其中6篇研究评价为“高偏倚风险”，其它为“无法判断”。根据GRADE分级的评估、制定和评价标准，该疗效评估指标的证据质量是“中等”。rTMS治疗的可接受性较好（RR=0.75，95%CI=0.49~1.15，基于28项研究的1492例样本），但接受rTMS治疗的患者出现轻微不良反应的比率更高（RR=2.20，95%CI=1.53~3.18，基于23项研究的1296例样本）。

结论：抗精神病药物治疗合并使用rTMS治疗可以一定程度改善精神分裂症患者的阴性症状，可接受性较好，不良反应较轻。但是本研究存在发表性偏倚，且研究的异质性较高，所以对结果进行解释时需要慎重。

Junjie Wang graduated at Jining Medical University in 1998 with her bachelor’s degree in Medicine and graduated from Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine with her master’s degree in 2003. In 2014,she was accepted into the Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and did her doctorate at the Shanghai Mental Health Center with a concentration in psychiatry and mental health. Her main research interests are the pathogenesis and early intervention for schizophrenia.

Notice for soliciting papers for the 14th academic conference of the Chinese Society of Neuroscience & Psychiatry (CSNP)

“The 14thannual academic conference of the Chinese Society of Neuroscience & Psychiatry”, which is hosted by CSNP, and undertaken by Mental Health Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s medical school and Shandong Mental Health Center, will be held in the Luneng Hilton Hotel in Jinan, Shandong, from 29thJune to 1stJuly, 2017.

The present society welcomes paper submissions and conference participations. The conference affair group accepts abstracts (objectives, methods, results and conclusions) under 1000 words. The website used for paper submissions and registrations is http://61.147.124.137:8088/2017/default.aspx. The academic committee of this conference will review papers and select high quality reports for presentation at the conference. We look forward to your participation and support! The deadline for paper submission is 1stJune, 2017.

We welcome colleagues from all over China and abroad to participate in this conference held in scenic Jinan.We are looking forward to a lively discussion on developments in the field.

Dates:29thJune to 1stJuly, 2017 (check in on 29thJune)

Address:Luneng Hilton Hotel in Jinan, Shandong, No.2888 South Erhuan Lu, Central District in Jinan

Cost arrangement:The registration fee, travel fee and accommodation fee are at your own expense. The registration fee is 1000 yuan (Shandong representatives and graduate students with student IDs can pay half of the registration fee). The accommodation fee from 30thJune to 1stJuly 2017 is 500 yuan per standard room.

Contact:Ruizhi Mao 18221768225

E-mail:csnpmeeting@163.com

Chinese Society of Neuroscience & Psychiatry

4th February 2017