People,Architecture,Technology
2019-12-30byZoeZhao
by Zoe Zhao
In early November, China Architecture Design Expo 2019 (CADE 2019) kicked off in Shanghai. Jointly hosted by the Architectural Society of China, Messe München GmbH and MMU BAU Fenestration Co., Ltd., CADE focuses on architectural designers and attracted massive attention with its Beijing debut last year.
With the theme of “People, Architecture and Technology,”CADE 2019 featured five themed exhibitions, three special exhibitions, BAU Congress China and 15 CADE architect salons. It attracted participation from many well-known domestic and international architectural designers as well as Chinas top architectural design institutes. CADE 2019 highlights the great changes that have taken place in architecture since the founding of the Peoples Republic of China in 1949 and emphasizes cross-cultural communication and the integration of technology and art.
China Pictorial recently interviewed Qi Bin, deputy chief architect of the Architectural Design and Research Institute of Tsinghua University, and Martin Jochman, founder and chief design director of JADE+QA, both key figures at CADE 2019. Qi has studied abroad for many years and participated in many international projects. His has worked on many public projects in recent years in China including the shooting range venue for the 2008 Beijing Olympics and the Xuzhou Art Museum. Martin Jochman has enjoyed a 40-year career of designing and building. For Chinese people, his most well-known international project was probably InterContinental Shanghai Wonderland. In 2013, Jochman established a studio in China and offices in both Shanghai and Hong Kong. With international perspectives and rich experience in architectural design, both Qi and Jochman have developed unique understandings of the relationship between people, architecture and technology.
China Pictorial (CP): As an expo highlighting the latest trends and developments in global architectural design, how do you see CADE standing out among its peers?
Qi Bin: Scanning present social development, it looks like the latest communication technology, artificial intelligence and big data are bringing on a new global technological revolution. Architectural design as an industry is facing both challenges and opportunities. In my opinion, CADE should shift more attention to the influences of the latest social changes and technological development of architectural designs as well as the subsequent changes in peoples use of architecture. Of course, CADE should also be involved in disseminating advanced industrial information such as the latest construction technology and products to architects in a timely and accurate manner. The expo should strive to become a platform to update architects philosophy, knowledge and information.
Showcasing modern China through architectural design is the major challenge facing the industry today. Architects and the public should jointly construct and safeguard a Chinese architectural culture rooted in traditional Chinese culture that absorbs and draws on advanced international ideas and methods. We must maintain our cultural heritage while constantly moving forward.
Jochman: The difference between my approach to design on my early projects in China in 2002 and now is huge. My first project was Thames Town in Songjiang, Shanghai. This was the “foot in the door” and we were all learning how to work with Chinese clients and design teams. This project was a great learning experience that taught me what is possible and what is not in the country, leading to more and more involvement in China with most clients wanting a “landmark”building to put their city and organization “on the map.”
The most remarkable difference between my work here and in the UK has been the speed of decision making and the positive attitude of the planning authorities enabling fast progress of the design. The opportunities in China are many. The focus now is on regeneration and redevelopment with emphasis on rural areas of China. However, challenges remain, especially finding ways to eliminate or reduce the environmental damage caused by so much development. Here the challenge is often utilizing already damaged “brownfield” industrial sites and finding new ways to preserve precious natural resources.
CP: Since the 1990s, Chinas architectural design market has become increasingly open to the outside. How have international exchange and cooperation benefited Chinas architectural design industry?
Qi: International exchange and cooperation have been the driving force of progress in Chinas architectural industry for many years. Recently, international architectural firms have thrived in China. They bring fresh architectural ideas, mature design methods and comprehensive design systems, helping Chinese architects continuously improve through competition and cooperation with foreign peers. At the same time, more buildings with international standards have been completed in China, giving the general public access to more high-level architectural works, which tends to improve aesthetics and taste, in turn cultivating a better environment for the growth of Chinese architecture.
Jochman: The benefits to the architectural environment in China have been immense. In the busy days of fast development before the 2008 Beijing Olympics and the Shanghai World Expo in 2010, many foreign architects found the opportunity to create architectural masterpieces in China that inspired architects both locally and abroad.
The expanding trend of Chinese students going to study all over the world, especially in the UK and the United States, coupled with experience of Chinese architects working in foreign studios in China, has helped improve understanding of the importance of achieving contemporary architecture of world-class quality. From early experimentation with crazy shapes and outright copying of famous foreign buildings without much understanding of context, Chinese architects have developed through the interaction of cultures and embracing their own contemporary style based on technological progress with sustainability as an overriding factor supplemented by principles of local cultural context and history.