RADIAL CONVEX SOLUTIONS OF A SINGULAR DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH THE MEAN CURVATURE OPERATOR IN MINKOWSKI SPACE∗
2019-05-31ZaitaoLIANG梁载涛
Zaitao LIANG(梁载涛)
School of Mathematics and Big Data,Anhui University of Science and Technology,Huainan 232001,China E-mail:liangzaitao@sina.cn;ztliang@aust.edu.cn
Yanjuan YANG(杨艳娟)†
College of Sciences,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China E-mail:yjyang90@163.com
Abstract In this paper,we study the existence of nontrivial radial convex solutions of a singular Dirichlet problem involving the mean curvature operator in Minkowski space.The proof is based on a well-known fixed point theorem in cones.We deal with more general nonlinear term than those in the literature.
Key words radial convex solutions;singular Dirichlet problem;mean curvature operator;fixed point theorem in cones
1 Introduction
The Dirichlet problems involving the mean curvature operator in Minkowski space are originated from the study of spacelike submanifolds of codimension one in the flat Minkowski space with prescribed mean extrinsic curvature[1,18],and have been attracted much attention by many researchers.During the past few years,the existence of radial solutions for such problems has been studied in literatures.See[2–6,8–10,15–17,19,20]and the references therein.For example,Bereanu et al.in[4]studied the existence of radial solutions for the following Dirichlet problem
where B(R)={x ∈ RN:|x|
Motivated by the works mentioned above,we continue to study this topic.In this paper,we study the existence of nontrivial radial convex solutions for the following singular Dirichlet problem
where f(t,u)is nonnegative and continuous in(t,u)∈ [0,1]×[0,1)and may be singular at u=1.For the radial symmetric solution v(x)=ω(r)with r=|x|,then problem(1.2)reduces to the following boundary value problem
A nontrivial convex solution of problem(1.3)is negative in[0,1].Here,ω(r)is a convex solution of the problem(1.3)if ω(r)satis fies(1.3)and is a convex function in[0,1].Taking the change of variables u(r)=−ω(r),problem(1.3)is then transformed into
Obviously,the positive concave solutions of problem(1.4)correspond to the nontrivial convex solutions of problem(1.3).Therefore,we just need to study the existence of positive concave solutions of problem(1.4).
In this paper,by applying a well-known fixed point theorem in cones[13],we first establish some existence criteria for positive concave solutions of problem(1.4),and then use such criteria to prove our main results.We should address here that our results presented in this paper have several novelties.First of all,up to our knowledge,it is the first time to study the existence of nontrivial radial convex solutions for Dirichlet problems with the mean curvature operator in Minkowski space.Second,the nonlinear term we deal with is more general than those in some known results,because they assume that the nonlinear terms are sublinear or superlinear at u=0 and u=1 with respect to φ(v).Our results include not only these cases but also some other interesting situations.For example,the case
and the case
where ρ >0 is a constant with,σ is a positive constant with
The rest part of this paper is organized as follows.In Section 2,we present some preliminary results.The main results of this paper are presented and proved in Section 3.
2 Preliminaries
Let X be a real Banach space and K be a closed,nonempty subset of X.If Ω is a subset of X,we use the notion
Lemma 2.1(see[13]) Let K be a cone in X.Assume that Ωaand Ωbare open bounded subsets of X with.Let T:be a compact and continuous operator such that
Then T has at least one fixed point in.The same conclusion holds if(i)holds on∂KΩband(ii)holds on∂KΩa.
Such a method was used in[7]to study the positive periodic solutions and eigenvalue intervals for systems of second order di ff erential equations.
In order to apply Lemma 2.1 to problem(1.4),we take X=C[0,1]with
De fine K to be a cone in X by
where σ is a positive constant with 0< σ <.Let
Before stating our main results,we need recall the following results.
Lemma 2.2(see[12,14]) The sets Ωaand Bahave the following properties
Obviously,the sets Ωaare unbounded for each a>0,so we can not apply Lemma 2.1 toΩa.Next,for each b>a,we claim that
which make it possible for us to apply Lemma 2.1.The first equality follows directly from(ii).For the second one,it is obvious that.By(iii),,we have
The following lemma is a direct consequence of[11,Lemma 2.2].
Lemma 2.3For any function u ∈ C([0,1],[0,∞))with u′(r)is decreasing in[0,1],we have
Simple computations lead to the following lemma.
Lemma 2.4De fine φ :(−1,1)→ R by.Then
and
3 Main Results
We de fine a nonlinear operator T onas follows
which implies that Tu(r)is decreasing on[0,1].Then we have
Note that
is decreasing on[0,1].Then it follows from φ is increasing and N ≥ 1 that(Tu)′(r)is decreasing on[0,1].By Lemma 2.3,we have
From(3.1)and(3.2),we know that⊂K.By a standard argument,it is easy to prove that T is compact and continuous onfor all a∈(0,1)(see[4,19]).
Theorem 3.1Suppose that the following two hypotheses are satis fied.
(H1) There exist positive constants c∈(0,1),α>0,and a nondecreasing function ϕ1∈ C([0,1),[0,∞))such that
with αϕ1(c)≤ Nφ(c);
(H2) There exist positive constants d∈(0,1),β>0,and a nondecreasing function ϕ2∈ C([0,1),[0,∞))such that
with
Then the following two conclusions hold
(C1)If c<σd,then problem(1.4)has at least one positive concave solution u satisfying
(C2)If c>d,then problem(1.4)has at least one positive concave solution u satisfying
ProofBy Lemma 2.1,we need to prove that
(i)kTuk≤kuk for u∈∂KBc,
(ii)there exists e∈ K{0}such that u 6=Tu+λe for u∈ ∂KΩdand λ >0.
We first consider(i).By(H1),for any u∈∂KBcand r∈[0,1],we have
which means that(i)holds.
Now we consider(ii).Let e≡1∈K{0},we claim that
Otherwise,assume that there exist u0∈ ∂KΩdand λ0>0 such that u0=Tu0+ λ0.Since u0∈∂KΩd,by property(iv)of Lemma 2.2,we have
Then by(2.1)and(H2),for any r∈ [σ,1−σ],we have
which implies that
This contradicts property(iii)of Lemma 2.2.Such contradiction shows that(ii)holds.
If c<σd,it follows from property(ii)of Lemma 2.2 that
Then by Lemma 2.1,we know that T has at least one positive fixed point,which satis fiesand kuk ≥ c.Furthermore,we haveσkuk,which yields kuk≤ d.Hence conclusion(C1)holds.
Thus conclusion(C2)holds.
Finally,by applying Theorem 3.1,we state and prove our main result.To this aim,we introduce the following assumption.
(H3)There exist nonnegative functions li:[0,1]→ [0,∞),i=1,···,4 such that
Theorem 3.2Assume that(H3)holds.Then problem(1.2)has at least one nontrivial radial convex solution if one of the following conditions holds.
(H4)0≤l1(r) (H5)0≤l2(r) ProofWe just need to prove the case when(H4)holds.The case when(H5)holds is completely analogous. It follows from 0≤l1(r) Choosing α =N and ϕ1(u)= φ(u),then we have and Thus(H1)holds. It follows from Nρ Choosing β =Nρ and ϕ2(u)= φ(u),then and Hence(H2)holds.Then by Theorem 3.1,we know that problem(1.2)has at least one nontrivial radial convex solution. ? In order to illustrate our main results,we present an example as follows. Example 3.3Consider the following problem where a:[0,1]→[0,∞)with a(r)>0 for r∈(0,1]. Theorem 3.4The following results hold (C3)Problem(3.3)has at least one nontrivial radial convex solution if p>1 and q>. (C4)Problem(3.3)has at least one nontrivial radial convex solution if 0 ProofProblem(3.3)can be regarded as a problem of form(1.2),where uniformly for r∈[0,1].If 0 Therefore,by applying Theorem 3.2,we know that conclusions(C3)and(C4)hold. ? AcknowledgementsWe would like to show our thanks to Professor Jifeng Chu(Shanghai Normal University)for useful discussions.
杂志排行
Acta Mathematica Scientia(English Series)的其它文章
- RIGIDITY THEOREMS OF COMPLETE KÄHLER-EINSTEIN MANIFOLDS AND COMPLEX SPACE FORMS∗
- APPROXIMATE SOLUTION OF A p-th ROOT FUNCTIONAL EQUATION IN NON-ARCHIMEDEAN(2,β)-BANACH SPACES∗
- THE CHARACTERIZATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SADDLE POINT CRITERIA FOR MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM WITH VANISHING CONSTRAINTS∗
- TIME-PERIODIC ISENTROPIC SUPERSONIC EULER FLOWS IN ONE-DIMENSIONAL DUCTS DRIVING BY PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS∗
- A FOUR-WEIGHT WEAK TYPE MAXIMAL INEQUALITY FOR MARTINGALES∗
- ON INTEGRABILITY UP TO THE BOUNDARY OF THE WEAK SOLUTIONS TO A NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID∗