APP下载

Existence of Solutions for Fractional Differential Equations with Conformable Fractional Differential Derivatives

2019-05-15WuYuexiangHuoYanmeiandLiangHuadong

Wu Yue-xiang,Huo Yan-meiand Liang Hua-dong

(1.Department of Applied Mathematics,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan,030006)

(2.College of Economics,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan,030006)

Communicated by Ji You-qing

Abstract:A class of nonlinear fractional differential equations with conformable fractional differential derivatives is studied.Firstly,Green’s function and its properties are given.Secondly,some new existence and multiplicity conditions of positive solutions are obtained by the use of Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorems on cone.

Key words:conformable fractional derivative,singular Green’s function,fractional differential equation

1 Introduction

In this paper,we are concerned with the existence of three positive solutions to the following nonlinear conformable fractional differential equation boundary value problem(BVP)

where 1<α≤2 is a real number,Dαis the conformable fractional derivative,and f:[0,1]×[0,+∞)→[0,+∞)is a continuous function.One of the difficulties here is the corresponding Green’s function G(t,s)is singular at s=0.Based on the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem on cone,we obtain sufficient conditions for the existence of three positive solutions to the conformable fractional boundary value problem(1.1)-(1.2).

Recently,the existence of positive solutions to the fractional differential equations has been of great interest,this is caused both by the intensive development of the theory of fractional calculus itself and by the varied applications in many fields of science and engineering,see,for instance,[1]–[3]and the references therein.

Bai and L¨u[4]considered the positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative,i.e.,

by defining Green’s function and using Krasnoselskiifixed point theorem,the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of(1.3)-(1.4)are acquired.Kang et al.[5]studied the existence of three positive solutions to the following boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation

where λ>0 is a positive parameter andis the standard Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative,h:(0,1)→ (0,∞)is continuous with,and f:[0,∞)→ [0,∞)is continuous.Based on the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem,some results for the existence of three positive solutions to the fractional boundary value problem(1.5)-(1.6)are obtained.

Afterwards,these methods attract many authors,and apply in all kinds of fractional differential equation boundary value problems,such as Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative problems(see[6]),Caputo fractional derivative problem(see[7]),impulsive problems(see[8]),integral boundary value problems(see[9]),etc.

In recent years,a new conformable fractional derivative was defined(see[10]–[12]),Dong and Bai[13]established the existence of positive solutions for nonlinear eigenvalue problems and some boundary value problems with conformable fractional differential derivatives.This motivated our study interesting with problem(1.1)-(1.2)by this new derivatives.

Duo to the corresponding Green’s function G(t,s)is singular at s=0,to the knowledge of the author,there are very few works on the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of boundary value problems for above nonlinear fractional differential equation.

To ensure that readers can easily understand the results,the rest of the paper is planned as follows.In Section 2,we recall certain basic definitions and present some lemmas.In Section 3,by the use of approach method and Krasnoselkii’s fixed points theorem on cone we obtain that the existence conditions of BVP(1.1)-(1.2)has at least one positive solution or three positive solutions.In Section 4,we give an example as an application of our results.

2 Preliminaries

Definition 2.1[10]Let f:[0,+∞)→ R be a continuous function,its conformable fractional derivative of order α∈(n,n+1]is defined as

Then f is called differential of order α.

Remark 2.1 Let α ∈ (n,n+1].Then Dαtk=0,where k=0,1,2,···,n.

Lemma 2.1[10]Let f:[0,+∞)→R be a continuous function,α∈(n,n+1].Then

Definition 2.2[11]Let f:[0,+∞)→R be a continuous function,its fractional integer of order α∈(n,n+1]defined as

where In+1is n+1 integer operator.

Lemma 2.2[12]Let f be differential of order α,α ∈ (n,n+1].Then

if and only if

where ak∈ R,k=0,1,2,···,n.

Lemma 2.3[13]Let y∈C[0,1],α∈(1,2].Then the BVP

has unique solution

where

is called the Green’s function of the problem(2.3)-(2.4).

Lemma 2.4[13]Green’s function G(t,s)satisfies the following properties:

Lemma 2.5[14]Let E be a Banach space,Tn:E → E(n=3,4,···)be completely continuous,T:E →E.If for any bounded subset Ω of E,∥Tnu−Tu∥⇒ 0 as n→∞,then T:E→E is completely continuous.

Definition 2.3[14]Let P be a cone of a Banach space E.Then a continuous mapping θ:P → [0,+∞)is called concave functional if θ(tx+(1 − t)y)≥ tθ(x)+(1 − t)θ(y)for all x,y∈P,0

Lemma 2.6[15]Let E be a Banach space and P be a cone of E,c>0 be a constant,Pc={x ∈ P|∥x∥ ≤ c}.Suppose that there exists a concave nonnegative continuous functional θ on P with θ(u) ≤ ∥u∥ for u ∈.Let P(θ,b,d)={x ∈ P|b ≤ θ(x), ∥x∥ ≤ d}.Let A:be completely continuous operator,and there exists a constant 0

(H1) The set{x ∈ P(θ,b,d)| θ(x)>b}is nonempty and θ(Ax)>b for all x ∈P(θ,b,d);

(H2) ∥Ax∥

(H3) θ(Ax)>b for all x ∈ P(θ,b,c)with ∥Ax∥ >d.

Then A has at least three fixed points x1,x2,x3.Furthermore,we have

Remark 2.2 If d=c,then condition(H1)implies(H3).

3 Main Results and Proofs

From Lemma 2.3,we can get that u(t)is a solution to the problem(1.1)-(1.2)if and only if it satisfies

Let E be a space of all continuous real function in[0,1]and be endowed with the maximum norm ∥,this space can be equipped with a partial order given by u,v∈C[0,1],u≤v⇔u(t)≤v(t)for all t∈[0,1].A cone P⊂E defined by

A concave nonnegative continuous functional θ on P defined as

Define T,Tn:P→E by

We need the following lemma.

Lemma 3.1 T:P→P be a completely continuous operator.

Proof.Firstly,we prove Tn:P → P,n=3,4,···are completely continuous operators.

For u∈P,from Lemma 2.4 and nonnegative of f(t,u),we have

Hence,

On the other hand,for u∈P,

Therefore,

Applying the method of proving Lemma 3.1 used in[12],we can obtain that Tn:P→P is completely continuous.Obviously,T:P→P.

Next we show that T:P→P is also completely continuous.

Indeed,set Ω⊂P is bounded set,i.e.,there exists a constant M such that

Let

Then,when u∈Ω,we have

From Lemma 2.5,T:P→P is completely continuous.The proof is completed.

Clearly,

Let

Notice that G(t,s)>0 for t,s∈(0,1),it is easy to see that

Theorem 3.1 Assume that f(t,u):[0,1]×[0,+∞)→[0,+∞)is a continuous function.Suppose that one of following cases can be satisfied:

Case 1.There exist two constants r1and r2withsuch that

Then there exists at least one positive solution u of the problem(1.1)-(1.2).

Proof.Suppose that Case 1 be satisfied.Firstly,by Lemma 3.1,T:P→P is completely continuous.Let

If u∈ ∂Ω2,then

By condition(A1),we have

i.e.,

On the other hand,If u∈∂Ω1,then

Then,by condition(A2),we have

i.e.,

By the Krasnoselskiifixed point theorem on cone expansion and compression,T has at least one fixed point u in,which is the positive solutions of the problem(1.1)-(1.2).

The proof of Case 2 is similar to that of Case 1,so here we omit it.

Theorem 3.2 Assume that f(t,u):[0,1]×[0,+∞)→[0,+∞)is a continuous function.Suppose that there exist two constants a and b withsuch that

Then there exist at least three positive solutions u1,u2,u3of the problem(1.1)-(1.2)which satisfies

Hence,

which implies that the condition(H2)of Lemma 2.6 holds.

Further,we have

i.e.,

This show that the condition(H1)of Lemma 2.6 holds.By using Lemma 2.6 and Remark 2.2 yields our proof.

Remark 3.1 Green’s function G(t,s)is singular at s=0.Based on the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem on cone,sufficient conditions are given for the existence of three positive solutions to the conformable fractional boundary value problem(1.1)-(1.2).In order to avoid happening contradictions,we do not need the condition f(t,u)≤ α(α +1)b for all(t,u)∈[0,1]×[0,b].In fact,it is easy to get thatfor.Related facts about fractional boundary value problem the reader is referred to[1]–[5],[8]–[9],[13],etc.On the other hand,from above proof of Theorem 3.2,our conditions for the existence of three positive solutions to the pr

oblem(1.1)-(1.2)are easy to be verified.

4 Example

As an application of our result,we give only an example.

Example 4.1 Consider the following fractional differential equations:

Then

Hence all the conditions of Theorem 3.2 are satisfied.Therefore by Theorem 3.2,the fractional differential equation(4.1)with the boundary value condition(4.2)has at least three solutions u1,u2,u3satisfying