The Statement Airline Service Quality Development

2014-09-09周威

校园英语·中旬 2014年7期

【Abstract】As the recent emergence of the Low Cost Carriers (LLCs) in Air-line industry, service differentiation and customer satisfaction takes critical role in order to sharpen competitive edges to both Full Service Carriers (FSCs) and LLCs. The current research aims to explore the nature of service quality in airline and its relationship to customer satisfaction. Air service quality dimensions using factor analysis are classified as Ticketing and Boarding Processes, Customer Encounter Services, and Tangibles. Further, the regression analysis reveals the strength of relationships between each of service quality dimensions and customer satisfaction scales that the Ticketing and Boarding Process dimension has the strongest co-relations with customer satisfaction scales.

【Key Words】Air Service Quality, Air Service Dimensions, Customer Satisfaction

【摘要】鉴于目前低成本航空公司(廉价航空)的出现,服务的差异化和旅客的满意度成为构化全面服务航空公司(全业务航空)和低成本航空公司(廉价航空)竞争优势的关键。此次研究的主要目标是“SERVQUAL”原理揭示航空公司服务质量的本性以及其与旅客满意度的内在联系。

I.Introduction

As services industry is rapidly growing, service quality are simply less expensive that replacing them with new has gained increased attention from both practitioners and academia. The main objective of service marketing is keeping current customers and exploiting potential customers through providing a higher customer satisfaction, which will eventually reach maximized sales revenue. Airline industry is one of the good representations of service industry. Though the sales of industry is growing on a yearly base, the net income of an individual business is decreasing 3.4% in every year due to increased competition, especially from emergence of the low cost carrier (Oum and Yu, 1998).

Due to the fierce environment of competition, airline companies set an emphasis on increasing new customers and keeping and nurturing current customers. Increasing number of airline companies consider joining in world-class airline alliances such as “Star Alliance” or “Skyteam” in order to increase level of services from service standardization as well as to offer wider range of transportation options through code-sharing within the alliance group.

Most of airline companies set marketing strategy of reaching customer satisfaction through service differentiation from competitors. Increased service quality elevates satisfaction level of airline passengers and satisfied customers stay with the service provider longer. This positive cycle is the main theme of loyalty marketing. Every company must be able to satisfy and retain customers. That is the key to business performance. Providing high quality products/services builds strong relationships with customers and ensures future revenue streams. Using the Profit Impact of Marketing Strategy data set, Buzzell and Gale (1987) demonstrate that companies offering higher quality of service realize above the normal market share growth. Also firms in the top quartile of relative service quality achieve an average eight percent higher price premium than their competitors. (Gale, 1992)

endprint

In the 1970s, quality gurus argue that “quality is free.” That is tireless pursuit of improvement should not only increase efficiency but also increase customer satisfaction in the process, saving enough on costs and bringing in enough new and repeat business to more than cover any expenditures on quality. In the 1980s the experts began to more focus more directly on increasing customers. More recently, quality and satisfaction have been viewed not sufficient by themselves. Companies began to view loyalty as the key to profitability (Johnson &Gustafsson, 2000). The above variables are closely related causes and effects, not an independent outcome. Service quality in airline industry includes reservations, ticketing, check-in and boarding processes, baggage check-in, and in-flight services. Research in service quality has gained attentions since Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1985) introduce a standardized service quality measurement scale, SERVQUAL. Since then, it has been applied in various industries. Among general service quality measurement instruments, SERVQUAL, in both original and modified versions, developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1985; 1988), is probably the tool that is one of the most widely used. SERVQUAL is designed to measure consumersservice quality perceptions in various industries using relative comparisons between service perceptions and expectations.

Since the emergence of LLCs in China, the air transportation industry has experienced unprecedented competition. Now two FSCs and five LLCs are competing in the industry. The market share of the LLCs is increasing from 0.1% to 27.7% in 2009 in the Chinese domestic air service industry. And the figure is expected to increase even faster. Moreover, two major FSCs in China have launched their own low cost subsidiaries in order to make adaptive changes to this new situation and to maintain their own existing market share. Thus, the environment of the Chinese air market will become increasingly competitive considering the rapid growth of new LCC entrants. Additionally, the Chinese LCC market is still in the introductory stage compared to the more mature US and European airline. In the US air market, LCCs are expected to extend their share of the market up to 40% in the near future (Rhoades & Waguespack, 2008).

As the emergence of LCCs, service differentiation becomes critically important. However, airline service research including both FSCs and LCCs is hard to find. Because of necessities raised above, this research aims to explore a service quality scale suitable for airline service. The specific research objective is to propose necessary service quality dimensions in the chosen industry and to find a relationship with customer satisfaction.

Ⅱ.Literature Review

1.Service Quality in Airline Industry

Service quality has been defined as the customers overall impression of the relative inferiority or superiority of the organization or its services (Zeithaml, Berry, & Parasuraman, 1990). Airline services come from tangible and intangible processes. The wide service range spans from air transportation, reservations, ticketing and check-ins, in-flight service, baggage check-ins, and airport services at the destination.

endprint

Newman(2001)stresses the importance of service quality in service firms that the businesses profitability and growth are fostered by customer retention. Retention is a function of customer satisfaction, which is mostly influenced by value of service quality delivered to customers. Thus, defining service quality is a key foundation for increasing firms competitiveness and profitability.

2.SERVQUAL

SERVQUAL, one of the most widely utilized service quality scales, is based upon a disconfirmation concept. The initial SERVQUAL was developed by Parasuraman, et al. (1985) as a standardized service quality measurement scale using a gap analysis. It is operationalized as Q = P E, which means service quality (Q) equals customers perception of service provision (P) minus service expectation (E).

The SERVQUAL has five dimensions of service qualities (Parasuraman et al., 1988), and it evolved from previous research done in 1985 by the same authors. From an exploratory factor analysis, Parasuraman et al. (1985) initially reveal ten potentially overlapping dimensions of service quality (see . The authors investigate service quality from four different service categories: retail banking, credit card, securities brokerage, and product repair and maintenance. The ten service quality dimensions are tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, communication, credibility, security, competence, courtesy, understanding/knowing the customer, and access. These basic domains and their descriptions serve as a foundation of SERVQUAL scale development. By using factor analysis and through the scale purification process, the ten dimensions later refine to SERVQUALs five distinctive dimensions: tangibles; reliability; responsiveness; assurance; and empathy. The first three of them keep their originality from their previous research, yet the other two dimensions (assurance and empathy) emerge from fusing the rest of the seven dimensions. Since its introduction, it has been applied in number of service industries and countries.

Dimensions of SERVQUAL

Dimensions Definitions

Tangibles Physical facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel

Reliability Ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately

Responsiveness Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service

Assurance Knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to inspire trust and confidence

Empathy Caring, individualized attention the firm provides its customers

Source: Parasuraman et al. (1988, p. 23)

3.Air Service Quality

As discussed previously about SERVQUAL-related criticism, one of the issues regarding SERVQUAL research is the applicability of service quality measurement scales that are developed for general purposes to a specific industry (Carman, 1990). Due to this issue, airline specific service characteristics are advised to be incorporated in addition to the original SERVQUAL items to develop a service quality scale suitable for airline services. So doing will better reflect service quality dimensions specifically related to a particular industry.

[1] [2] 3 [4] 本文为全文原貌未安装PDF浏览器用户请先下载安装原版全文存入我的阅览室

《校园英语·中旬》
2017年16期

开卷有益: 用爱心点燃激情

高等教育: 大学英语文化体验教学研究; 影子练习对提高英语听解能力的作用; 大学英语教学中文化教学的现状研究; The Barriers in Writing With Students: Topic Selection and Organizing Ideas; 基于提高学生英语写作能力的英语语法课程改革探索与实践; 基于学生兴趣的大学英语词汇教学有效性探究; 非英语专业大学英语教学中跨文化意识的培养研究; 英语专业学生英语段落写作中常见语法错误分析; 浅谈英语翻译专业大学生到合格口译员的转变; 普通高校“艺体生”大学英语教学改革:问题与对策; 英语公众演讲教学中的“倾听”能力培养; 跨文化交际背景下大学英语教学模式探析; 基于网络资源的非英语专业学生写作能力培养模式研究; 口译教学中的语用能力培养; 同伴在线评价在非英专写作教学中实践的可行性研究; 正确处理少数民族预科英语学习与大学英语学习的关系; 浅析高等教育国际化背景下新建本科院校的英语教学改革; 高校专门用途英语的课程设置与学生核心职业能力培养; 大学戏剧课程教学设计探讨; 英语课文复述教学的方法探析; 如何提高预科生的英语口语; 浅谈美剧对英语学习的积极作用; 平行语料库对翻译教学的影响; 大学英语教师的课堂语言艺术与魅力

职业教育: 对高职院校ESP教师自主发展途径的探索; 高职院校雅思考试培训市场前景分析及培训模式研究; 中职英语教学中实施“合作学习”的研究; 探究任务型教学在高职空乘专业英语听力教学中的应用; 如何开发和利用英语教学资源; 试论如何提高大学生英语快速阅读理解能力; Analyse the Deficiencies in Teaching English speaking in Secondary School in China; 学习共同体视野下的高职高专英语课堂教学模式研究; 浅析学生英语学习需求视角下的大学英语教学; 关于海乘专业口头陈述教学方法提高口语技能研究; 基于应用能力考核的高职酒店管理专业公共英语课程考评体系研究; 谈英语分层次教学; 高职高专实用英语课程教考分离探析; 试析高职英语分层教学存在的问题及应对方法; 高职动漫英语教学创新改革研究; 优化中职英语晨读课实效策略研究; 基于Wi-Fi的英语自主学习; 浅谈多媒体在技校英语教学中的运用; 高职商务英语专业职业能力培养研究; 提高卫校英语阅读教学的策略探析; 提升高职高专英语听力的对策; 英语课程的建设与实施; 浅谈中职学校英语形成性评价的方法; 我对英语精读和泛读的一点看法; 浅析图式理论在高职英语阅读教学中的应用; 浅析中职英语教学中的兴趣教学; 高职高专英语口语教学存在的问题与对策

基础教育: 小学英语自由多样化学习的研究与探索; 英语阅读教学中存在的问题及解决对策; 新时期小学英语教学探究; 农村小学英语口语教学的提升策略探究; 浅析英语“交际教学法”的重要意义; 初中英语阅读效率的优化途径探析; 关于提升英语专业教师母语文化素养的思考; 高中英语课堂提问有效性的策略探讨; 浅谈情感教育在初中英语教学中的可行性; 新课程理念下的教学设计探讨; 提高初中英语课堂教学效益的方法研究; The Creation of Easy and Stress-free Classroom; 高中英语阅读教学中的互动模式研究; 诌议高中英语学业成就评价存在的问题及对策; 初中英语词汇学习的难点与对策研究; 运用图表的方式教授被动语态之探究; 小学英语听说能力的培养策略研究; 英语高考改革,应三思而行; 浅谈学案型教学在写作课中的尝试; 小学英语教学中预设和生成的关系探讨; 教学法生活化打造高效英语课堂; 浅议高中英语教学中的文化教学; 浅谈在课堂教学中培养中学生英语自主学习能力的策略; 李阳疯狂英语在初中英语教学中的运用; 初中英语教学中互动式教学模式的构建和应用; 高中英语课堂教学中的动态教学策略; 过程写作法在初中英语写作教学中的应用; 新课改初中学生英语阅读能力的培养; 培养学生想象力,让英语课堂绽放魅力; 研究性教学在高中英语教学中的渗透; 初中英语教学中问题的巧妙设置; 暗示教学法在小学英语教学中的应用; “实物教材”让英语课堂“活”起来; 打造高效和谐的小学英语课堂; 《PEP小学英语》教学案例; 奏响高效课堂的“乐章”; 小学生良好英语学习习惯的要求与培养; 主题式评价让评价有“评”有“价”; 提高初中生参与英语课堂活动积极性的策略与实践; 从“教英语”到“用英语教”; 中学生英语课堂中学习情感的培养; 行动研究及其在档案袋评价中的应用; 多媒体技术与英语词汇教学; 高中生英语写作能力浅析; Better story,better English; 用游戏辅助小学英语教学; 输入和输出理论在高中英语教学中的应用; 农村小学英语教学活动中存在的“病症”及“诊疗”; 引领学生在英语课堂上“一路高歌”; 浅谈如何改善小学英语学习策略; 浅谈如何在英语教学中关注学生的情感态度; Should Young School Children be Required to Study Art; 从心理学角度剖析如何调动学生课堂积极性; 如何激发学生学习英语的兴趣; 巧用多元复习方法,提高英语复习效率; 教书育人,因材施教; 如何引导学生课堂提问; 在小学英语教学中怎样做好课堂活动; 浅谈小学英语教学中的评价策略; 浅谈初中英语教学的氛围作用; 初中英语教学渗透传统文化的方法; 优化高中英语阅读教学的策略; 宾语补足语的用法总结及其高考考点分析; How to improve oral English; 提高英语课堂有效教学的的几个技巧; 发掘学生学习潜能提高英语课堂教学实效; 小学英语教学拓展环节语言输出有效性的策略; 浅谈如何培养中学生英语自主学习的能力; 如何在英语教学中改变教法培优助困; 爱——英语课堂的“空调器”; 初中英语作文“写长”好处多; 议高中英语课堂如何引导互动口语交流; 浅谈高中英语课堂的导入技巧; 英语高考总复习策略; 品读的艺术; 小学英语课堂阅读教学的有效方法; 浅谈高中生如何提高英语写作水平

语言文化: 从模因论看语用的礼貌原则; 同感理解与跨文化交际; 反叛抑或传承; 语法化的认知语用解读; 从语用学的角度谈品牌名称及其效应; 网络时代对大学英语语言学习环境的要求研究; 涌现理论在二语习得中的应用; 《中国大学生英语书面语中的口语化倾向; Empirism and Experiments; Developing Cultural Awareness in English Writing; A Brief Introduction of Interpersonal Relationships' Influence on Address Forms in China; A Comparative Study of the Chinese and American Compliments; When Literature Language Meets News Language; Analyzing Phonics Plays the Important Role in the Oral English; Markedness Features of Online ChattersEnglish Nicknames; 浅析语义模糊与语用模糊; 英汉植物隐喻对比研究; The Research on Turn-taking Mechanism in Northeast song-and-dance duets

翻译探究: 浅析文化语境对翻译的影响; 多模态话语分析视域下的电影字幕翻译; 浅析英诗汉译的文体选择; 专门用途英语特征及其翻译方法; A brief analysis of translator's subjectivity

文艺鉴赏: 欧.亨利讽刺艺术在《女巫的面包》中的体现; 布迪厄社会学视角下“熊猫丛书”失败原因分析; Different form and technique between The Outstation and The Mark on the Wall; 论《日本榅桲》中人物对人性和自然的疏离

大视野: The Statement Airline Service Quality Development; Anything But Ordinary; Expansion during Recession

首页
- 返回阅览室首页
文本版
- 文本可复制，文章单篇阅读
专题版
- 精选封面文章,荟萃每日精华
原貌版
- 原版原式,翻页阅读,图文并茂,绚丽多姿
智能语音
- 智能语音杂志,在线试听,下载播放
多媒体
- 影音多媒体呈现,绚丽动人
《读者》阅览室
- 《读者》阅览室
更多..
RSS
大众精品期刊

公司地址: 北京市西城区德外大街83号德胜国际中心B-11

客服热线：400-656-5456 客服专线：010-56265043 电子邮箱：longyuankf@126.com

电信与信息服务业务经营许可证：京icp证060024号

Perceived air service quality by the customer has been suggested as the main factor in sustaining an advantage in a strong competitive environment. An airlines competitive advantages are determined by the passengers perception of service quality. Research has demonstrated that the service provided is one of the foremost reasons for choosing an airline. Moreover, according to numerous airline research studies, airline service quality has an influence on service differentiation, passenger perceived value, passenger satisfaction, airline choice, and passenger behavioral intention. Consistent with previous studies, an airline which gives passengers superior quality service as compared to the perceived airline service from competitors would be a market leader (Prayag, 2007).

4. Customer Satisfaction

Customer satisfaction is understood as a consumers perceived value received from a product or service provider during his/her transactional or on-going relationships (Heskett, Sasser, & Schlesingler, 1997). Researchers defined customer satisfaction as a consumers state of being as a result of consumption experience.

Customer satisfaction can be understood as either an outcome or a process (Yi, 1990). Oliver (1997) theorizes customer satisfaction as a static concept, which is a cognitive and an affective response obtained through a current transaction or current consumption experience. His disconfirmation theory explains how consumers evaluate variables influencing consumers satisfaction. According to Olivers disconfirmation theory (Oliver, 1980), a customers satisfaction can be described as the result of a product comparison from his/her set of standards (expectation or other norm of performance) with the product performance. If the performance exceeds the standards or expectations, then increase in satisfaction is expected. And if the performance is less than the standards (expectations), decrease in satisfaction is expected. Positive or negative disconfirmation results when perceived performance deviates from the standards. Disconfirmation is thus expected to affect consumers satisfaction.

In this theory, consumer satisfaction is hypothesized primarily as a function of disconfirmation. On the other hand, the process oriented customer satisfaction examines whether the whole processes of consumption experiences achieves an expected result or not. It looks at the entire consumption processes and finds a specific process that might lead to customer satisfaction. This approach seems to draw more attention to the perceptual, evaluative, and psychological processes that combine to generate customer satisfaction (Yi, 1990, P70).

References：

[1]Brady, M.K. & Cronin, J.J. (2001), “Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach” Journal of Marketing, Vol.65 No.3, pp.34~49.

[2]Cronin, J.J. & Taylor, S.A. (1992), “Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension” Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, pp.55~68.

[3]Field, A. (2005), “Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd Edition)”, London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi: Sage.

[4]Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.M. (2005), “Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edition”, Prentice-Hall.

[5]Johnson, M.D. & Gustafsson, A. (2000), “Improving customer satisfaction, loyalty, and profit” SanFrancisco, CA: Jossery-Bass.

[6]Kim, Y., Kim, Y., & Lee, Y. (2011), “Perceived Service Quality for South Korean Domestic Airlines” Total Quality Management, Vol.22 No.10, pp.1041~1056.

[7]Lam, S.Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M.K., & Murthy B. (2004), “Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from business-to-business service context”Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, Vol.32, pp.293~311.

[8]Nam, S. (2008), “Exploring service dimensions: From an American and Korean banking case” The Academy of Korea Customer Satisfaction Management, Vol.10 No.3, pp.129~145.

endprint

4. Customer Satisfaction

References：

[1]Brady, M.K. & Cronin, J.J. (2001), “Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach” Journal of Marketing, Vol.65 No.3, pp.34~49.

[2]Cronin, J.J. & Taylor, S.A. (1992), “Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension” Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, pp.55~68.

[3]Field, A. (2005), “Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd Edition)”, London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi: Sage.

[4]Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.M. (2005), “Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edition”, Prentice-Hall.

[5]Johnson, M.D. & Gustafsson, A. (2000), “Improving customer satisfaction, loyalty, and profit” SanFrancisco, CA: Jossery-Bass.

[6]Kim, Y., Kim, Y., & Lee, Y. (2011), “Perceived Service Quality for South Korean Domestic Airlines” Total Quality Management, Vol.22 No.10, pp.1041~1056.

[8]Nam, S. (2008), “Exploring service dimensions: From an American and Korean banking case” The Academy of Korea Customer Satisfaction Management, Vol.10 No.3, pp.129~145.

endprint

4. Customer Satisfaction

References：

[1]Brady, M.K. & Cronin, J.J. (2001), “Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach” Journal of Marketing, Vol.65 No.3, pp.34~49.

[2]Cronin, J.J. & Taylor, S.A. (1992), “Measuring service quality: A re-examination and extension” Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, pp.55~68.

[3]Field, A. (2005), “Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd Edition)”, London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi: Sage.

[4]Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.M. (2005), “Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edition”, Prentice-Hall.

[5]Johnson, M.D. & Gustafsson, A. (2000), “Improving customer satisfaction, loyalty, and profit” SanFrancisco, CA: Jossery-Bass.

[6]Kim, Y., Kim, Y., & Lee, Y. (2011), “Perceived Service Quality for South Korean Domestic Airlines” Total Quality Management, Vol.22 No.10, pp.1041~1056.

[8]Nam, S. (2008), “Exploring service dimensions: From an American and Korean banking case” The Academy of Korea Customer Satisfaction Management, Vol.10 No.3, pp.129~145.

endprint