腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果

2019-10-01邱国军牟伟纲孙铁峰

中国实用医药 2019年20期

邱国军　牟伟纲　孙铁峰

【摘要】目的比較腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法 120例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者，按随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组，各60例。对照组采取传统开腹胆囊切除与胆总管取石手术治疗，研究组采取腹腔镜联合胆道镜进行胆囊切除与胆总管取石手术治疗。比较两组患者手术时间、术中失血量、术后恢复排气时间、术后1 d时视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分、住院时间、术后并发症发生情况及术后1年内复发情况。结果研究组术中失血量（36.5±5.8）ml少于对照组的（87.6±8.6）ml，术后恢复排气时间（47.5±5.6）h、住院时间（8.2±2.0）d均短于对照组的（83.5±8.5）h、（14.6±2.5）d，术后1 d时VAS评分（3.5±0.8）分低于对照组的（6.7±1.8）分，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;两组手术时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。研究组术后并发症发生率3.33%低于对照组的15.00%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组术后1年内复发率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石，可以有效减少术中失血量，降低术后疼痛程度与并发症发生率，利于患者康复。

【关键词】腹腔镜;胆道镜;传统开腹手术;胆囊结石;胆总管结石

DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2019.20.003

Clinical effect of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope and traditional laparotomy in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis with common bile duct stones QIU Guo-jun， MOU Wei-gang， SUN Tie-feng. Department of Emergency Surgery， Qingdao Eighth Peoples Hospital， Qingdao 266000， China

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope and traditional laparotomy in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis with common bile duct stones. Methods A total of 120 patients with cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones were divided by random number table method into control group and research group， with 60 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional laparotomy for cholecystolithiasis with common bile duct stones， and the research group was treated with laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope for cholecystolithiasis with common bile duct stones. Comparison were made on operation time， intraoperative blood loss， recovery time of postoperative exhaust， visual analogue scale （VAS） score in postoperative 1 d， occurrence of postoperative complications and recurrence within 1 year between the two groups. Results The research group had less intraoperative blood loss as （36.5±5.8） ml than （87.6±8.6） ml in the control group， shorter recovery time of postoperative exhaust as （47.5±5.6） h and hospitalization time as （8.2±2.0） d than （83.5±8.5） h and （14.6±2.5） d in the control group， and lower VAS score in postoperative 1 d as （3.5±0.8） points than （6.7±1.8） points in the control group. Their difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. Both groups had no statistically significant difference in operation time （P>0.05）. The research group had lower incidence of postoperative complications as 3.33% than 15.00% in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. Both groups had no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate within 1 year （P>0.05）. Conclusion For the treatment of cholecystolithiasis with common bile duct stones， laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopy can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss， lower postoperative pain and complication rate， and facilitate rehabilitation.

总之，腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的复发率相当，但腹腔镜联合胆道镜可以有效减少术中失血量，降低术后疼痛程度与并发症发生率，利于患者康复。

參考文献

[1] 罗小怀，杜一鸿. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜与开腹治疗胆囊、胆总管结石的疗效比较. 实用临床医药杂志， 2018， 22（22）：21-23.

[2] 周宗喜，廖波，李永周. 两种不同方法治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的临床疗效比较. 中国临床新医学， 2018， 11（10）：1020-1024.

[3] 吴义杰. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果. 实用医技杂志， 2018， 25（10）：1158-1159.

[4] 闫国强. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜经胆囊管治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石36例临床分析. 中国医疗器械信息， 2018， 24（19）：109-110.

[5] 张磊，赵乐. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石伴胆总管结石. 深圳中西医结合杂志， 2018， 28（19）：125-126.

[6] 黄健. 腹腔镜下胆总管切开取石术与经胆囊管取石术治疗胆总管结石伴胆囊结石患者疗效分析. 实用肝脏病杂志， 2018， 21（2）：269-272.

[7] 闫凌，张盈，张晨光. 两种手术方案治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者效果比较研究. 实用肝脏病杂志， 2018， 21（2）：301-302.

[8] 王明贵，蔡君惠. 开腹手术与腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果. 临床医学研究与实践， 2018， 3（6）：72-73.

[9] 陈铁炯，郑军. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石临床对比分析. 中华全科医学， 2018， 16（2）：226-228.

[10] 曹辉，高凤勤. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效分析. 肝胆外科杂志， 2017， 25（6）：434-436.