lnduction chemotherapy with docetaxel,cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma:Two cases of report

Sho Watanabe,Yoshitaka Honma,Naoya Murakami,Hiroshi Igaki,Taisuke Mori,Hidekazu Hirano,Natsuko Okita,Hirokazu Shoji,Satoru Iwasa,Atsuo Takashima,Ken Kato,Kenya Kobayashi,Fumihiko Matsumoto,Seiichi Yoshimoto,Jun Itami,Narikazu Boku

Abstract

Key words: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma;Chemotherapy with docetaxel,cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy;Docetaxel;Cisplatin;Fluorouracil;Intensity-modulated radiotherapy;Chemoradiotherapy;Case report

INTRODUCTION

Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is an uncommon neoplasm of uncertain pathogenesis that originates in the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses.SNUC is diagnosed as a locally advanced disease at the T4 stage in 71%-100% of patients[1,2]and with neck nodal involvement in 12%-24%[1,3].Hematogenous metastasis is rarely found on presentation.Though the use of surgery provided the largest survival benefit,a poor disease-free survival rate of 26.3% was reported with a median followup of 15 mo[4].A substantial number of SNUC patients do not have surgery because of the wide extension of the tumor[5]and receive only chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy,which provided limited efficacy with a two-year survival rate of 25%-40%[4].Therefore,there has long been a need for intensive multimodality therapy,but no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment regimen or sequence.

We describe here two cases of locally advanced SNUC (LA-SNUC) in which induction chemotherapy with docetaxel,cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) and subsequent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent high-dose cisplatin led to a durable remission of the disease with manageable toxicities.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

In case 1,a 39-year-old man presented with tearing and pain in the right eye.The chief complaint of case 2 was visual disturbance.

History of present illness

The patient in case 1 reported that the symptoms had been worsening for the last two months.In case 2,the patient had felt worsening visual disturbance for one week.

History of past illness

Both patients had no remarkable history of illness.They were current smokers.

Personal and family history

No remarkable personal or family history of illness was found in either case.

Physical examination upon admission

In case 1,on physical examination,edema was found in the right eyelid.In case 2,a visual acuity test showed totally impaired vision in the right eye.

Laboratory examinations

In both cases,no remarkable findings were discovered in the laboratory tests.

Imaging examinations

In case 1,a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head showed a tumor involving the paranasal sinuses,nasal cavities,right orbit and cranial base(Figure 1A).Cervical lymph nodes were not affected.In case 2,a contrast-enhanced MRI of the head revealed an intranasal tumor invading the nasal septum,orbital apex and cranial base (Figure 2A).

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

In case 1,a transnasal biopsy revealed pleomorphic tumor cells in the nasal epithelium.Immunohistochemically,the tumor cells were positive for AE1/3.Staining of the tumor cells for p40,thyroid transcription factor-1,neuron-specific enolase,S100,CD56,and nuclear protein in testis were negative (Figure 3).The tumor was diagnosed as SNUC.In case 2,a diagnosis of SNUC was also made based on the pathological features and immunophenotype of transnasal biopsy samples.The imaging features confirmed the locally advanced stages of the tumors in both cases(cT4bN0M0,stage IV,Union for International Cancer Control,the 7thedition of TNM classification[6]).

TREATMENT

In case 1,the tumor was considered unresectable due to its wide invasion to the dura mater.Three cycles of TPF chemotherapy (docetaxel,70 mg/m2,day 1;cisplatin,70 mg/m2,day 1;fluorouracil,750 mg/m2,day 1-5) was initiated with three-week intervals.On the first cycle of chemotherapy,a significant tumor reduction was obtained with marked improvement of the symptoms.His treatment was complicated with mild dysgeusia and anorexia.After achieving a partial response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours,version.1.1),he was treated with definitive IMRT of 70 Gy.The intensity-modulating technique helped minimize radiation exposure of the optic nerves.Three cycles of cisplatin was concurrently administered every three weeks with a dose reduced to 80% (80 mg/m2) due to the prolonged anorexia caused by the prior TPF chemotherapy.In case 2,because of the invasion to the sphenoid sinus,surgical resection was not appropriate for the patient.He received three cycles of induction TPF chemotherapy,which led to a partial response with a substantial improvement of vision.The adverse events included mild nausea and transient hearing impairment.He was subsequently treated with a combination of IMRT of 70 Gy and three cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2,day 1).The third dose of cisplatin was reduced to 80% because of severe nausea.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

A complete response was achieved (Figure 1B) in case 1 and the patient has been alive and well without disease for 44 mo.In case 2,a complete remission of the disease was confirmed (Figure 2B),and he remains recurrence-free with recovered vision for 44 mo.

Figure1 lmaging features in case 1.

DISCUSSION

SNUC is a high-grade uncommon tumor possibly arising from the schneiderian epithelium,which lines the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.The pathological diagnosis of SNUC is difficult because of the rarity of the disease and the varying morphology of the tumor cells.Immunohistochemical profiling of the tumor cells is an essential part of the diagnosis,but no consistent immunoreactive markers,except pankeratins,have been reported.Lack of p40 expression has been reported to be a robust marker[7],which was consistent with the findings in our cases.

Patients often present with non-specific symptoms,including nasal obstruction,epistaxis,facial swelling or pain,headache and cranial nerve deficits,which also make diagnosis challenging.SNUC rapidly invades the neighboring structures,which leads to the high prevalence of advanced disease at diagnosis and the poor outcome[5].

Since improved disease-free survival was shown in patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy,radiotherapy and surgery[8],a multimodal approach was adopted.The frequent presentation of patients with unresectable disease,the poor outcome with initial surgery,and the chemo-sensitive nature of SNUC cells motivated the strategy of induction therapy.A favorable two-year survival rate of 64% was reported in Kadish B or C[9]SNUC patients who had good performance status and received the induction treatment followed by craniofacial resection.The use of induction chemotherapy was associated with an improved two-year recurrence-free survival of 73% in a multicenter study[10].However,the optimal regimen of induction chemotherapy has not been established.A poor response to chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin and vincristine warranted a change in the regimen[11].A platinum-based regimen has been preferred since a response rate of 60% was obtained in patients treated with the induction chemotherapy of platinum and fluorouracil[12].Induction regimens comprising taxane,cisplatin and fluorouracil significantly improved local control,distant failure and overall survival in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients,compared with induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and fluorouracil[13].Based on these results,TPF chemotherapy has been applied as an induction regimen and shown to provide durable local control in a few LA-SNUC cases,although no details were provided[14,15].In our cases,TPF induced rapid responses,which helped in the radiographic planning of IMRT,and did not compromise patients’ compliance in the subsequent chemoradiotherapy,all of which supported the use of the TPF regimen in this setting.As the chemotherapeutic regimens differ among institutions and the choice of regimen is often made by the treating physicians,more research is needed in order to establish the optimal induction regimen.

Although surgery remains the preferable treatment for LA-SNUC,its use has been limited by some issues:selection criteria for surgery varied across institutions,and 10%-75% of patients failed to receive surgery[5].In the surgical cases,pathologically complete resection of the tumor has often been unachievable because of tumor invasion to the adjacent structures.In fact,approximately half of patients receiving surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy had close or positive surgical margins,which might result in local recurrence[11].Additionally,the external incisions potentially compromise the cosmetic outcome and quality of life of patients.

Figure2 lmaging features in case 2.

In unresectable LA-SNUC cases,definitive chemoradiotherapy alone has been widely used[3],but it has shown less promising efficacy than the multimodality treatment that includes surgery[5].The case series showed a poor median overall survival,ranging from 7 to 19 mo,in patients receiving chemoradiotherapy only[2,16,17],which demanded more intensive treatment.A small number of LA-SNUC patients received induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy,which is recommended for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients[18].Chemotherapy with platinum and fluorouracil and subsequent chemoradiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin showed a two-year survival rate of 64% in LA-SNUC patients[12].Considering that most patients had more advanced diseases that were not resectable,the two-year survival rate appeared to be better than that in patients who underwent surgery[11].In order to investigate the efficacy of induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy,we undertook a review of the literature using PubMed (Table 1).The search terms used were “sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma” and “SNUC”.All SNUC cases published until November 2018 were included in the search.Then,the data of patients receiving induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy were extracted.Cases in which treatment options or outcomes were not individually described were excluded from the review.Our review highlighted a survival benefit of adding induction chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy.Compared with the previous cases,our cases showed improved survival.In addition to the effect of the TPF induction chemotherapy,IMRT may contribute to the outcome.IMRT enabled an achievement of steep dose gradients near target volumes,which greatly impacted on a doseresponse relationship in SNUC,and led to a lower rate of radiation-induced toxicity.Retrospective studies indicated the crucial role of IMRT,showing that the use of IMRT was related to longer survival of SNUC patients[10,19].A recently published study also demonstrated the intriguing finding that in patients who responded to induction chemotherapy,definitive chemoradiotherapy provided a better chance of disease control and improved survival than did surgical resection[20],suggesting the possibility that definitive chemoradiotherapy can replace surgery even in resectable LA-SNUC cases.

The prognostic factors for LA-SNUC remain unclear.UICC TNM staging of head and neck cancer has long been applied to SNUC,but the T staging on admission was not prognostic[10].Our cases with T4 disease showed improved survival,possibly because they were down-staged by induction TPF chemotherapy and received subsequent chemoradiotherapy.The impact of local tumor spread on survival should be further investigated.Metastatic lymph nodes of the neck were occasionally found at presentation of SNUC[1].The dissection or elective neck node irradiation (ENI) for metastatic cervical nodes led to excellent local control[17,21],but the prognosis for cervical lymph node metastasis still remains controversial.Two retrospective studies reported conflicting results:the neck involvement was associated with lower survival in Kadish C patients in a meta-analysis[4].In contrast,no significant difference in survival was shown between N0 and N1-2 patients in a multicenter study[10].For the node-negative SNUC,the survival benefit of prophylactic ENI has not been clarified,and the comprehensive ENI may worsen the long-term quality of life[1].Patients with relapsed lymph nodes who do not receive ENI might be successfully salvaged with surgery or radiotherapy.Our patients with node-negative disease did not receive the ENI and remained disease-free.Thus,the role of prophylactic ENI for the N0 SNUC patients can still be debated.

Figure3 Pathological findings in case 1.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion,our cases,along with our review of the literature,highlighted the promising efficacy and safety of intensive treatment with induction TPF chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in LA-SNUC.This treatment option should be a curative alternative to surgery for LA-SNUC patients.

Table1 lnduction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma