Some Inequalities for the Polynomial with S-Fold Zeros at the Origin
2016-10-12AhmadZirehandMahmoodBidkham
Ahmad Zirehand Mahmood Bidkham
1Department of Mathematics,Shahrood University of Technology,Shahrood,Iran
2Department of Mathematics,University of Semnan,Semnan,Iran
Some Inequalities for the Polynomial with S-Fold Zeros at the Origin
Ahmad Zireh1,∗and Mahmood Bidkham2
1Department of Mathematics,Shahrood University of Technology,Shahrood,Iran
2Department of Mathematics,University of Semnan,Semnan,Iran
Abstract.Let p(z)be a polynomial of degree n,which has no zeros in|z|<1,Dewan et al.[K.K.Dewan and Sunil Hans,Generalization of certain well known polynomial inequalities,J.Math.Anal.Appl.,363(2010),pp.38–41]established
for any|β|≤1 and|z|=1.In this paper we improve the above inequality for the polynomial which has no zeros in|z|<k,k≥1,except s-fold zeros at the origin.Our results generalize certain well known polynomial inequalities.
Polynomial,s-fold zeros,inequality,maximum modulus,derivative.
AMS Subject Classifications:30A10,30C10,30D15
Analysis in Theory and Applications
Anal.Theory Appl.,Vol.32,No.1(2016),pp.27-37
1 Introduction and statement of results
Let p(z)be a polynomial of degree n,then according to a result known as Bernstein’s inequality[3]on the derivative of a polynomial,we have
The result is best possible and equality holds for the polynomials having all its zeros at the origin.
If the polynomial p(z)has all its zeros in|z|≤1,then it was proved by Turan[10]that
With equality for those polynomials which have all their zeros at the origin.
For the class of polynomials having no zeros in|z|<1,the inequality(1.1)can be replaced by
The inequality(1.3)was conjectured by Erd¨os and later proved by Lax[6].
As an extensionof the inequality(1.2)Malik[7]proved that if p(z)having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1,then
Govil[5]improved the inequality(1.4)and proved that if p(z)is a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1,then
As a refinement of the inequality(1.4)Aziz and Zargar[2]proved that if p(z)is a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1,with s-fold zeros at the origin, then
Recently Dewan and Hans[4]obtained a refinement of inequalities(1.2)and(1.3).They proved that if p(z)is a polynomial of degree n and has all its zeros in|z|≤1,then for every real or complex number β with|β|≤1,
and in the case that p(z)having no zeros in|z|<1,they proved that
In this paper,we obtain an improvement and generalizations of the above inequalities. For this purpose we first present the following result which is a generalization and refinement of inequalities(1.5),(1.6)and(1.7).
Theorem 1.1.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1,with s-fold zeros at the origin where 0≤s≤n,then for every β∈C with|β|≤1 and|z|=1,
With equality for p(z)=aznwhere a∈C.
Remark 1.1.Clearly for k=1 and s=0 the inequality(1.9)reduces to the inequality(1.7).
According to Lemma 2.1,if p(z)is a polynomial of degree n,having all its zeros in |z|≤k,k≤1,with s-fold zeros at the origin,then for|z|=1,
then for every complex number β with|β|≤1,by choosing suitable argument of β we have
Combining(1.9)and(1.10)we have
or
equivalently
Making|β|→1,then
Since for 0≤s<n and k≤1,we haveand for s=n we have n−s=0,therefore the following result is a refinement and extention of the inequality(1.6).
Corollary 1.1.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1,with s-fold zeros at the origin,then we have
If we take s=0 in Corollary 1.1,theninequality(1.11b)reduce to inequality(1.5).Now if we take β=−1 in Theorem 1.1,we have the following result
Corollary 1.2.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1,with s-fold zeros at the origin,then
If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n,having no zeros in|z|<k,k≥1,except s-fold zeros at the origin,i.e.,p(z)=zsh(z),where h(z)is a polynomial of degree(n−s)that does not vanish in|z|<k,k≥1,then the polynomial
is of degree n,having all its zeros in|z|≤1/k,with s-fold zeros at the origin.Also
By applying Theorem 1.1 for the polynomial q(z),we get the following result
Corollary 1.3.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n,having no zeros in|z|<k,k≥1,except s-fold zeros at the origin,then for any β∈C with|β|≤1 and|z|=1,
where
Finally by using Corollary 1.3,we prove the following interesting result which is a generalization of the inequality(1.8).
Theorem 1.2.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n,having no zeros in|z|<k,k≥1,except s-fold zeros at the origin,then for every complex number β with|β|≤1,
If we take k=1 in(1.14)we have
Corollary 1.4.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n,having no zeros in|z|<1,except s-fold zeros at the origin,then for every complex number β with|β|≤1,
For s=0 the inequality(1.15)reduces to the inequality(1.8).
2 Lemmas
For the proof of these theorems,we need the following lemmas.The first lemma is due to Aziz and Shah[1].
Lemma 2.1.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n,having all its zeros in the closed disk|z|≤k, k≤1,with s-fold zeros at the origin,then for|z|=1,
Lemma 2.2.Let F(z)be a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros in|z|≤k,k≤1 and f(z)be a polynomial of degree not exceeding that of F(z).If|f(z)|≤|F(z)|for|z|=k,k≤1,and F(z), f(z)have common s-fold zeros at the origin,then for every real or complex number β with|β|≤1 and|z|=1,
Proof.Let α be a complex number with|α|<1,then|αf(z)|<|F(z)|for|z|=k.It is concluded from Rouche’s Theorem,the polynomial αf(z)−F(z)has as many zeros in |z|<k as F(z)and so has all of its zeros in|z|<k,with s-fold zeros at the origin.On applying Lemma 2.1,we have for|z|=1,
Therefore for any real or complex number β with|β|<1,the polynomial
for|z|=1.
Equivalently
for|z|=1.This concludes that
for|z|=1.If the inequality(2.4)is not true,then there is a point z=z0with|z0|=1 such that
Now take
then|α|<1 and with this choice of α,we have from(2.3),T(z0)=0 for|z0|=1.But this contradicts the fact that T(z)6=0 for|z|=1.For β with|β|=1,the inequality(2.4)follows by continuity.This is equivalent to the desired result.
Lemma 2.3.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n with s-fold zeros at the origin,then for any β∈C with|β|≤1,k≤1 and|z|=1,
Lemma 2.4.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n with s-fold zeros at the origin and k≥1,then for any β∈C with|β|≤1 and|z|=1,
where
Proof.Let p(z)=zsh(z),where h(z)is a polynomial of degree n−s.Then the polynomial
is of degree n with s-fold zeros at the origin.Also
By applying Lemma 2.3 for the polynomial q(z),we get the result.
Lemma 2.5.If p(z)is a polynomial of degree n with s-fold zeros at the origin and k≥1,then for any β∈C with|β|≤1 and|z|=1,
where
has all its zeros in|z|≤1/k with s-fold zeros at the origin and
for|z|=1/k.Therefore,by applying Lemma 2.2 to polynomials G(k2z)and kn+sH(z),we have for|β|≤1,1/k≤1 and|z|=1,
or
Now by applying the inequality(2.6)and choosing a suitable argument of α,we have
By combining inequalities(2.8)and(2.9),we obtain
Or
Making|α|→1 we have the result.
The following lemma is due to Zireh[11].
Lemma 2.6.If
is a polynomial of degree n,having all its zeros in|z|<k,(k>0),then m<kn|an|,where m= min|z|=k|p(z)|.
3 Proofs of the theorems
Proof of Theorem1.1.If p(z)has a zero on|z|=k,then=0 and the inequality (1.9)is true.Therefore we suppose that p(z)has all its zeros in|z|<k with s-fold zeros at the origin.We consider p(z)=zsh(z),where h(z)is a polynomial of degree(n−s)has all its zeros in|z|<k and h(0)6=0.Let m=and m1=then m=ksm1>0 and
for|z|=k,hence
for|z|=k.Therefore,if|λ|<1 then it follows by Rouche’s Theorem that the polynomial
has all its zeros in|z|<k with s-fold zeros at the origin.Also by using Lemma 2.6 the polynomial
is of degree n,for|λ|<1.On applying Lemma 2.1 to the polynomial G(z)of degree n, we get
i.e.,
where|z|=1.
Therefore for β with|β|<1,it can be easily verified that the polynomial
i.e.,
will have no zeros on|z|=1.As|λ|<1 we have for β with|β|<1 and|z|=1,
i.e.,
For β with|β|=1,(3.1)follows by continuity.This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.□Proof of the Theorem 1.2.Let m=min|z|=k|p(z)|.By hypothesis the polynomial p(z)has no zeros in|z|<k,except s-fold zeros at the origin.Correspondingly the polynomial
has all its zeros in|z|≤1/k with s-fold zeros at the origin and
for|z|=1/k.Then by applying Lemma 2.2 to the polynomials p(k2z)and kn+sq(z),we have for|z|=1,
If m=0,by combining inequalities(3.2)and(2.7),Theorem 1.2 follows.
Therefore we suppose that m6=0 then for every complex number λ with|λ|<1,we have
where|z|=k.Hence by Rouche’s Theorem the polynomial
has no zero in|z|<k except s-fold zeros at the origin.Therefore the polynomial
On applying Lemma 2.2 for G(k2z)and kn+sH(z),we have
By using the inequality(1.13),for an appropriate choice of the argument of λ,we have
By combining(3.3)and(3.4),we get for|z|=1 and|β|≤1,
Equivalently
As|λ|→1,we have
This is a conjunction with inequality(2.7),which completes the proof of Theorem 1.2.□
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees,for the careful reading of the paper and the helpful suggestions and comments.
References
[1]A.Aziz and W.M.Shah,Inequalities for a polynomial and its derivative,Math.Ineq.Appl., 7(2004),379–391.
[2]A.Aziz and B.A.Zargar,Inequalities for the maximum modulus of the derivative of a polynomial,J.Inequal.Pure Appl.Math.,8(2007),8 pages.
[3]S.Bernstein,Leons sur les Proprs Extrmales et la Meilleure Approximation des Fonctions Analytiques dune Variable Relle,Gauthier Villars,Paris,1926.
[4]K.K.Dewan and S.Hans,Generalization of certain well-known polynomial inequalities,J. Math.Anal.Appl.,363(2010),38–41.
[5]N.K.Govil,Some inequalities for derivative of polynomials,J.Approx.Theory,66(1991), 29–35.
[6]P.D.Lax,Proof of a conjecture of P.Erd¨os,on the derivative of a polynomial,Bull.Amer. Math.Soc.,50(1944),509–513.
[7]M.A.Malik,On the derivative of a polynomial,J.London.Math.Soc.,1(1969),57–60.
[8]Q.I.Rahman and G.Schmeisser,Analytic Theory of Polynomials,Oxford University Press, New York,2002.
[9]H.A.Soleiman Mezerji,M.Bidkham and A.Zireh,Bernstien type inequalities for polynomial and its derivative,J.Adv.Research Pure Math.,4(2012),26–33.
[10]P.Turan,Uber die ableitung von polynomen,Compos.Math.,7(1939),89–95.
[11]A.Zireh,On the maximum modulus of a polynomial and its polar derivative,J.Ineq.Appl., (2011),9 pages.
10.4208/ata.2016.v32.n1.3
8 July 2015;Accepted(in revised version)27 October 2015
∗Corresponding author.Email addresses:azireh@shahroodut.ac.ir,azireh@gmail.com(A.Zireh), mdbidkham@gmail.om(M.Bidkham)
杂志排行
Analysis in Theory and Applications的其它文章
- On Copositive Approximation in Spaces ofContinuous Functions II*:The Uniqueness of Best Copositive Approximation
- H1-Estimates of the Littlewood-Paley and Lusin Functions for Jacobi Analysis II
- On the Green Function of the Annulus
- General Interpolation Formulae for Barycentric Blending Interpolation
- Hardy Type Estimates for Riesz Transforms Associated with Schr¨odinger Operators on the Heisenberg Group
- Toeplitz Type Operator Associated to Singular Integral Operator with Variable Kernel on Weighted Morrey Spaces