Histological assessment in peripheral nerve tissue engineering

Víctor Carriel, Ingrid Garzón Miguel Alaminos Maria Cornelissen

1 Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, Granada, Spain

2 Department of Basic Medical Sciences (Histology and Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Histological assessment in peripheral nerve tissue engineering

Víctor Carriel1,2, Ingrid Garzón1, Miguel Alaminos1, Maria Cornelissen2

1 Department of Histology (Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, Granada, Spain

2 Department of Basic Medical Sciences (Histology and Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

The histological analysis of peripheral nerve regeneration is one of the most used methods to demonstrate the success of the regeneration through nerve conduits. Nowadays, it is possible to evaluate different parameters of nerve regeneration by using histological, histochemical, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural techniques. The histochemical methods are very sensible and are useful tools to evaluate the extracellular matrix remodeling and the myelin sheath, but they are poorly speci fi c. In contrast, the immunohistochemical methods are highly speci fi c and are frequently used for the identi fi cation of the regenerated axons, Schwann cells and proteins associated to nerve regeneration or neural linage. The ultrastructural techniques offer the possibility to perform a high resolution morphological and quantitative analysis of the nerve regeneration. However, the use of a single histological method may not be enough to assess the degree of regeneration, and the combination of different histological techniques could be necessary.

peripheral nerve regeneration; histology, histochemistry; immunohistochemistry; quantitative histology

Carriel V, Garzón I, Alaminos M, Cornelissen M. Histological assessment in peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(18)：1657-1660.

Introduction

Peripheral nerves (PN) are specialized organs that form a highly complex network throughout the body providing the motor and/or sensory innervations to target organs. Histologically, PN are composed by two main elements, a functional unit or parenchyma and the stroma. The parenchyma consists of the nerve fibers, formed by axons and the surrounding Schwann cells (SC), while the stroma is formed by three layers of specialized connective tissues. The SC can myelinate a single axon forming the myelinated nerve fibers, or a single SC can interact with a small group of thinner axons forming the unmyelinated nerve fibers. In the case of the stroma, it regulates the compartmentalization of these organs. In transversal sections of PN, it is possible to observe how nerve fi bers are immersed in the endoneurial connective tissue and it is surrounded by the perineurial layer that forms individual fascicles which are immersed in a vascularized connective tissue called epineurium (Geuna et al., 2009; Mills, 2012).

The normal function of the PN is often affected by traumatic injuries with serious physical and/or psychological consequences for these patients (Daly et al., 2012; Carriel et al., 2014a). Direct nerve repair is the preferred treatment for short nerve gaps, and nerve autografting is the gold standard treatment for critical nerve defects, although it has wellknown disadvantages. Nerve conduits (tubulization) are often used with variable success rates (Daly et al., 2012; Carriel et al., 2014b). Due to the clinical limitations associated to the autograft and the unsatisfactory results obtained with the tubulization technique, current research is focused on the development of novel tissue engineering alternatives to repair critical nerve gaps. In these sense, a range of strategies were achieved or are under investigation, highlighting the use of micropatterned structures, aligned biomaterials and the use of conduits fi lled with cellular scaffolds (Daly et al., 2012; Carriel et al., 2013, 2014b).

Peripheral nerve tissue engineering (PNTE) is focused on the development of successful strategies to promote nerve regeneration from the clinical, functional and histological point of view. In this sense, the sciatic nerve functional index (walking track and toe spread), the toe spread and the pinch test of sensory recovery are frequently used to measure clinical and functional parameters (Vleggeert-Lankamp, 2007; Carriel et al., 2013). Currently, one of the most used and reliable method to evaluate nerve regeneration is the electrophysiological assessment of the distal muscles (innervated by the injured nerve), which allows determining the degree of muscle denervation or reinnervation (Vleggeert-Lankamp, 2007; Carriel et al., 2013). In addition, the evaluation of the muscle weight and volume is another simple and useful method to assess the degree of muscle recovery (Vleggeert-Lankamp, 2007; Xie et al., 2008).

Figure 1 Histological method as quality control in PNTE.

Regarding to the histological analysis, there are several histological, histochemical, immunohistochemical and also ultrastructural methods with speci fi c applications. First, it is necessary to understand the basic concepts of the PN histology in normal conditions and during regeneration. This process is characterized by the proliferation and migration of the local cells, specially the SC, which progressively synthesize a new extracellular matrix (ECM) and form the bands of Büngner that guide the axonal growth from the proximal to the distal nerve stump (Geuna et al., 2009; Daly et al., 2012; Carriel et al., 2013, 2014). These cellular and molecular processes are essential for the success of nerve regeneration. In addition, the most reliable way to evaluate them with high accuracy is the histological and ultrastructural analysis, making the histological analysis one of the most useful quality controls in PNTE.

The fi rst and more critical step in histology is the fi xation of the tissues, whose main objective is to maintain clear and consistent morphological features, to inhibit the metabolic processes and post-mortem bacterial degradation (Kiernan, 2008). Currently, cryo fi xation and chemical fi xation (coagulant and non-coagulant) are used in PNTE (Kalbermatten et al., 2009; Carriel et al., 2011a, 2013; di Summa et al., 2014). Cryofixation is a good method to preserve the enzymatic activity and tissue antigens. For this reason, it is a suitable method for histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. Regarding to the chemical fixation, the aldehyde-based fi xatives are the most used for light and electron microscopy. Once the tissues are fi xed, they can be embedded in OCT (cryofixation), paraffin (light microscopy) or resin (electron microscopy), and sectioned for their staining (Kiernan, 2008).

Staining procedure in light microscopy

Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) are the most used staining agents for light microscopy in pathology and research. HE staining is commonly non-speci fi c for many tissue elements due to its electropolar nature (Carriel et al., 2011a, b). Using this method, it is not possible to observe the myelin sheath and the ECM is nonspeci fi cally stained. Therefore, HE is not an ideal method allowing an accurate analysis of the nerve regeneration process (Di Scipio et al., 2008; Raimondo et al., 2009; Carriel et al., 2011a).

Trichrome staining offers the possibility to differentiate the collagen fi bers of the ECM from the other types of structures (epithelial tissue, muscles, parenchyma,etc.). Masson’s trichrome is the most common trichrome method in pathology and muscle histology, but it is infrequently used for the histological analysis of PN. The quality of the histology of PN with this method is considerably better than HE (Raimondo et al., 2009). However, it is not possible to identify the myelin sheath with high accuracy with this method (Figure 1A).

Regarding the myelin, it is composed by several types of lipids and lipoproteins. Unfortunately, a signi fi cant amount of these elements are dissolved by organic solvents during tissue processing, but some of them are preserved (associated to structural proteins), thus allowing their identification. Interestingly, pre-embedding myelin sheath staining with OsO4 is a useful alternative to identify myelin with high accuracy in light microscopy (Di Scipio et al., 2008; Li et al., 2013). This method can be combined with other histochemical methods including Masson’s method or immunohistochemical procedures.

In formalin-fixed tissues myelin is frequently stained with luxol fast Blue (LFB) method, which speci fi cally stains myelin in blue. However, LFB only allows the speci fi c identification of myelin, and it is not possible to make a comprehensive assessment of the morphologic parameters and ECM remodeling associated to the PN regeneration process (Carriel et al., 2011a). In this sense, the technical limitations associated to the LFB were improved with the new integrated histochemical method called MCOLL. This method combines the speci fi city and sensibility of conventional LFB (myelin), picrosirius staining (collagen fibers) and Harris haematoxylin (cellular nucleus) allowing the identification of different parameters simultaneously (Figure 1B, C). This method was successfully used in PNTE, allowing an accurate histological and histochemical evaluation of the nerve regeneration (Carriel et al., 2011a, 2013).

Finally, another useful technique is the histochemical identi fi cation of the acetylcholinesterase activity in skeletal muscle cryosections. This method was used to identify with high speci fi city the newly-formed endplate during the reinnervation of the distal skeletal muscles (Jiao et al., 2009).

Immunostaining in PNTE

The immunohistochemical and immuno fl uorescence methods allow the identification of highly specific proteins in tissue sections. Both methods are suitable for cryosections or formalin- fi xed tissues. Currently, there are several antibodies that recognize speci fi c proteins related to cell lineage (surface or intracellular markers), cytoskeletal proteins, ECM molecules, growth factors, etc., and their correct application is essential to establish the degree of PN regeneration in PNTE (Vleggeert-Lankamp, 2007; Raimondo et al., 2009; Mills, 2012; Carriel et al., 2013, 2014b).

SCs play a key role during PN regeneration, and their identification with conventional histological techniques is extremely dif fi cult, but they can be identi fi ed with high accuracy with antibodies that recognize the glial fi brillar acid protein (GFAP) and the S-100 protein (Figure 1D). Due to the importance of SC during nerve regeneration, high levels of SC immunostaining associated to an organized pattern of regeneration is considered as a positive indicator of nerve regeneration in PNTE (Kalbermatten et al., 2009; Siemionow et al., 2011; Carriel et al., 2013; di Summa et al., 2014).

Demonstration of axonal regrowth is the most important indicator of PN regeneration. Axons are mainly composed by neurotubules and neurofilaments and both cytoskeletal proteins can be easily evaluated by the immunohistochemical identi fi cation of β-III tubulin (Huang et al., 2012), neuro fi laments (Ma et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2012; Carriel et al., 2013) and growth associated protein-43 (GAP-43), which is speci fi c of newly-formed axons that do not express neurofilaments (Figure 1E, F) (Carriel et al., 2014b). Another commonly used marker to evaluate the axonal growth is the protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5), which is positive in neurons and neuroendocrine cells (Kalbermatten et al., 2008).

Regarding the ECM, it plays a crucial role in guiding the complex process of PN regeneration. Laminin is a normal component of the basal membrane of nerve fi bers and this glycoprotein supports SC proliferation and migration during nerve regeneration (Chernousov et al., 2008; Carriel et al., 2013). Despite the important role of laminin in this process, it is infrequently evaluated in PNTE. However, its expression is a valid parameter to determine the degree of PN regeneration (Siemionow et al., 2011; Carriel et al., 2013). In the case of collagen fi bers, these may be evaluated by histochemical methods such as MCOLL and Masson’s trichrome.

Myelin can also be detected by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence using antibodies that specifically recognize the myelin basic proteins (Carriel et al., 2011a; Mills, 2012). This also applies to the muscular endplate, which can be evaluated with high accuracy and resolution by using a rhodamine-conjugated α-bungarotoxin that irreversibly binds to the postsynaptic acetylcholine receptor site (Ma et al., 2011; Li et al., 2013).

Quantitative histology

Histology is classically considered as a purely descriptive method. However, over the recent years, several studies demonstrate that it is possible to perform morphometric or quantitative analyse in histological sections (Raimondo et al., 2009). Regarding the morphometric analysis, it is possible to determine the number of cells in a speci fi c area, the diameters of cells or structures, the area occupied by regeneration tissue or injury etc.

More recently, it is possible to determine with accuracy the intensity and area fraction of the positive reaction for histochemical (Carriel et al., 2011b, 2013; Oliveira et al., 2013), immunohistochemical or immunofluorescence techniques (Carriel et al., 2013, 2014b). The intensity is related to the increase of the expression or synthesis of some proteins (not all of them). Neurofilament intensity is significantly higher in native nerves as compared to the newly-formed axons during nerve regeneration. However, the experimental groups with high levels of regeneration (functional and histological) showed similar intensity values than native nerves in contrast to other experimental groups (Carriel et al., 2014b). The same was performed for the intensity of S-100 and laminin (Carriel et al., 2013). In relation with the area fraction, this allows determining the percentage of positive reaction in a speci fi c histological area. This method was successfully applied to the quantitative determination of the area fraction occupied by myelinated nerve fibers with the MCOLL histochemical method. In addition, quantitative analysis was applied to immunohistochemical methods for determination of S-100 area fraction, laminin, neuro fi lament (Carriel et al., 2013) and, more recently GAP-43 (Carriel et al., 2014b). Additionally, this quantitative approach was also used as histological quality control of the ECM following a chemical and physical decellularization of small intestine for tissue engineering applications (Oliveira et al., 2013).

Semithin and ultrathin sections in PNTE

For more researchers, the gold standard in PN histology is toluidine blue staining of resin-embedded semithin sections (Raimondo et al., 2009; Carriel et al., 2011a; Mills, 2012). By using this method, most of the myelinated axons can be clearly identified and myelin sheaths are sharply delimited due to post- fi xation and staining with OsO4 (Figure 1G, H). The high morphological quality of this method makes it a suitable method to perform a morphometric analysis of PNregeneration. In this sense, the most important parameters that can be used as quality control are: number of fibers, density of fi bers, diameter of fi bers and axons, cross-sectional area of fibers and axons, perimeter of fibers and axons, myelin thickness, myelin thickness/axon-diameter ratio, and fiber-diameter/axon-diameter ratio or axon-diameter/fiber-diameter (g-ratio) (Vleggeert-Lankamp, 2007; Raimondo et al., 2009; Bozkurt et al., 2012).

The ultrathin sections are often used to evaluate ultrastructural changes associated to the axonal growth and myelination process by transmission electron microscopy. In addition, it is a suitable method to perform morphometric analyses and also to identify and evaluate the unmyelinated nerve fi bers (Hirano, 2005).

Conclusions

In order to determine the degree of PN regeneration with high accuracy in PNTE, it is necessary to combine clinical, functional, electrophysiological and histological analyses. Regarding the histology, there are several technical alternatives to evaluate different important parameters associated to the success of failure of nerve regeneration. In all cases, a proper knowledge of the PN histology in normal and regenerative conditions is essential to perform an adequate histological description and to apply the most adequate histological method. Currently, there are useful histochemical techniques available for assessment of the nerve regeneration process such as OsO4 technique, the MCOLL histochemical method and the gold standard toluidine blue in semithin sections. In relation to the immunohistochemical markers, there are a wide range of antibodies available to evaluate PN regeneration, especially S-100, GFAP, neuro fi lament, β-III tubulin, GAP-43, and laminin.

In conclusion, PN regeneration is a complex process and the use of a single descriptive histological method may not be enough to assess the degree of regeneration. In this sense, it is and it will be necessary to combine different histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques with morphometric or quantitative parameters in order to fi nd statistical differences between the different models of nerve regeneration. Finally, histological assessment of the PN regeneration is one of the most reliable methods available to demonstrate the success or failure of the PN regeneration in tissue engineering.

Acknowledgments:We are grateful to Ms. Ariane Ruyffelaert from the Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University, Belgium, for revising the English version.

Con fl icts of interest:None declared.

Bozkurt A, Lassner F, O’Dey D, Deumens R, Bocker A, Schwendt T, Janzen C, Suschek CV, Tolba R, Kobayashi E, Sellhaus B, Tholl S, Eummelen L, Schugner F, Damink LO, Weis J, Brook GA, Pallua N (2012) The role of microstructured and interconnected pore channels in a collagen-based nerve guide on axonal regeneration in peripheral nerves. Biomaterials 33:1363-1375.

Carriel V, Garzon I, Alaminos M, Campos A (2011a) Evaluation of myelin sheath and collagen reorganization pattern in a model of peripheral nerve regeneration using an integrated histochemical approach. Histochem Cell Biol 136:709-717.

Carriel V, Garrido-Gomez J, Hernandez-Cortes P, Garzon I, Garcia-Garcia S, Saez-Moreno JA, Del Carmen Sanchez-Quevedo M, Campos A, Alaminos M (2013) Combination of fi brin-agarose hydrogels and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for peripheral nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng 10:026022.

Carriel V, Alaminos M, Garzon I, Campos A, Cornelissen M (2014a, b) Tissue engineering of the peripheral nervous system. Expert Rev Neurother 14:301-318.

Carriel V, Garzón I, Campos A, Cornelissen M, Alaminos M (2014a, b) Differential expression of GAP-43 and neuro fi lament during peripheral nerve regeneration through bioartificial conduits. J Tissue Eng Regen Med (in press).

Carriel VS, Aneiros-Fernandez J, Arias-Santiago S, Garzon IJ, Alaminos M, Campos A (2011b) A novel histochemical method for a simultaneous staining of melanin and collagen fi bers. J Histochem Cytochem 59:270-277.

Chernousov MA, Yu WM, Chen ZL, Carey DJ, Strickland S (2008) Regulation of Schwann cell function by the extracellular matrix. Glia 56:1498-1507.

Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A (2012) A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery. J R Soc Interface 9:202-221.

Di Scipio F, Raimondo S, Tos P, Geuna S (2008) A simple protocol for paraf fi n-embedded myelin sheath staining with osmium tetroxide for light microscope observation. Microsc Res Tech 71:497-502.

di Summa PG, Kingham PJ, Campisi CC, Raffoul W, Kalbermatten DF (2014) Collagen (NeuraGen((R))) nerve conduits and stem cells for peripheral nerve gap repair. Neurosci Lett 572:26-31.

Geuna S, Raimondo S, Ronchi G, Di Scipio F, Tos P, Czaja K, Fornaro M (2009) Chapter 3: Histology of the peripheral nerve and changes occurring during nerve regeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol 87:27-46.

Hirano A (2005) The role of electron microscopy in neuropathology. Acta Neuropathol 109:115-123.

Huang W, Begum R, Barber T, Ibba V, Tee NC, Hussain M, Arastoo M, Yang Q, Robson LG, Lesage S, Gheysens T, Skaer NJ, Knight DP, Priestley JV (2012) Regenerative potential of silk conduits in repair of peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. Biomaterials 33:59-71.

Jiao H, Yao J, Yang Y, Chen X, Lin W, Li Y, Gu X, Wang X (2009) Chitosan/ polyglycolic acid nerve grafts for axon regeneration from prolonged axotomized neurons to chronically denervated segments. Biomaterials 30:5004-5018.

Kalbermatten DF, Kingham PJ, Mahay D, Mantovani C, Pettersson J, Raffoul W, Balcin H, Pierer G, Terenghi G (2008) Fibrin matrix for suspension of regenerative cells in an arti fi cial nerve conduit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:669-675.

Kalbermatten DF, Pettersson J, Kingham PJ, Pierer G, Wiberg M, Terenghi G (2009) New fi brin conduit for peripheral nerve repair. J Reconstr Microsurg 25:27-33.

Kiernan JA (2008) Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice: Scion Publishing Limited.

Li QT, Zhang PX, Yin XF, Han N, Kou YH, Deng JX, Jiang BG (2013) Functional recovery of denervated skeletal muscle with sensory or mixed nerve protection: a pilot study. PLoS One 8:e79746.

Ma CH, Omura T, Cobos EJ, Latremoliere A, Ghasemlou N, Brenner GJ, van Veen E, Barrett L, Sawada T, Gao F, Coppola G, Gertler F, Costigan M, Geschwind D, Woolf CJ (2011) Accelerating axonal growth promotes motor recovery after peripheral nerve injury in mice. J Clin Invest 121:4332-4347.

Mills SE (2012) Histology for pathologists, 4thEdition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health.

Oliveira AC, Garzon I, Ionescu AM, Carriel V, Cardona Jde L, Gonzalez-Andrades M, Perez Mdel M, Alaminos M, Campos A (2013) Evaluation of small intestine grafts decellularization methods for corneal tissue engineering. PLoS One 8:e66538.

Raimondo S, Fornaro M, Di Scipio F, Ronchi G, Giacobini-Robecchi MG, Geuna S (2009) Chapter 5: Methods and protocols in peripheral nerve regeneration experimental research: part II-morphological techniques. Int Rev Neurobiol 87:81-103.

Siemionow M, Duggan W, Brzezicki G, Klimczak A, Grykien C, Gatherwright J, Nair D (2011) Peripheral nerve defect repair with epineural tubes supported with bone marrow stromal cells: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 67:73-84.

Vleggeert-Lankamp CL (2007) The role of evaluation methods in the assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration through synthetic conduits: a systematic review. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg 107:1168-1189.

Xie F, Li QF, Gu B, Liu K, Shen GX (2008) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a biodegradable chitosan-PLA composite peripheral nerve guide conduit material. Microsurgery 28:471-479.

Víctor Carriel, M.Sc., M.Biol., Ph.D., Department of Histology and Tissue Engineering Group (CTS-115), Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. de Madrid 11, 18012 Granada, Spain; Department of Basic Medical Sciences (Histology, Tissue Engineering Group), Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 B3, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, vcarriel@ugr.es; victor.carriel@ugent.be.

10.4103/1673-5374.141798

http://www.nrronline.org/

Accepted: 2014-07-25