Water-jet vs traditional triangular tip knife in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal dysmotility:A systemic review and metaanalysis

Yuliya Belopolsky,Srinivas R Puli

Yuliya Belopolsky,Srinivas R Puli,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria,Peoria,IL 61605,United States

Abstract BACKGROUND Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an increasingly used less invasive modality to treat esophageal dysmotility.Recently,triangular tip knife with integrated water jet function has been introduced to mitigate multiple instrument exchanges.AIM To compare traditional triangular tip knife and water jet knife in terms of procedural success,duration,instrument exchanges,coagulation forceps use,and adverse events.METHODS We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis with two authors independently in electronic databases (PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library) from inception through May 2021.In addition,we conducted a relevant search by Reference Citation Analysis (RCA) (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com).A fixed-effects model was used to calculate weighted mean,odds ratio (OR),and confidence intervals (CI).RESULTS We included 7 studies involving 558 patients.Triangular knife and water jet knife were similar in odds of procedural success with ratio of 4.78 (95%CI=0.22-102.47) and odds of clinical success with ratio of 0.93 (95%CI=0.29-2.97),respectively.Water jet knife had fewer instrument exchanges compared to triangular knife (2.21,95%CI=1.98-2.45 vs 11.9,95%CI=11.15-12.70) and usage of coagulation forceps (1.75,95%CI=1.52-1.97 vs 2.63,95%CI=2.37-2.89).Adverse events were higher in triangular knife group (OR: 2.30,95%CI=1.35-3.95).CONCLUSION Peroral endoscopic myotomy using water jet knife is comparable in terms of procedural success to triangular tip knife.Water jet knife also required shorter procedural duration,less instrument exchanges,coagulation devices,and overall adverse events.

Key Words: Gastroenterology;Endoscopy gastrointestinal;Esophageal motility disorders;Water jet knife;Dysmotility

lNTRODUCTlON

Idiopathic achalasia is classified as an esophageal motility disorder thought to be related to loss of inhibitory ganglion cells in the esophageal myenteric plexus.This leads to failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax and aperistalsis of the esophageal body[1].It has an annual incidence of 1 in 100000 and a prevalence of about 10 in 100000[2].At present-day,there are no curative treatments to reverse loss of neurons,and thus palliative therapies to weaken the LES and allow passive emptying of the esophagus have been implemented.These have ranged from endoscopic pneumatic dilation to invasive measures such as surgical myotomy.

More recently,peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has gained traction due to its novel technique of preserving the mucosal layer while working in the submucosa and minimizing risk of leakage of contents into the mediastinum.It hails comparable efficacy and safety data to the standard surgical therapy of laparoscopic Heller myotomy in short term follow up studies[3,4].The first endoscopic myotomy was described in 1980 by three Venezuelan gastroenterologists,and later the technique refined with a submucosal tunnel based on two USA publications in 2007 performed on pigs[5-7].POEM as we know it today,was initially performed on 17 achalasia patients by Inoueet al[8] in a groundbreaking study in 2010.

The major steps of POEM are similar among centers,including small mucosal incision,submucosal tunneling,myotomy,and mucosal closure.Within these individual steps,many tools and variations exist to achieve the result.Traditionally,the knife that has been used is a conventional triangular tip knife (TT),which is an electrosurgical knife that has a conductive triangle tip for cutting mucosa.Cutting mucosa can be performed in any direction without rotating the knife,making it suitable for marking,incision,and dissection.Recently,an innovative water-jet integrated triangular tip knife (WJ) has been devised in order to improve procedural time with less instrument changes,as well as minimize adverse events.It comprises a thinner and more compact tip as well as jet function to allow saline injection after cutting without the need to switch devices (Figures 1 and 2).There have been several studies comparing the conventional triangular TT and WJ and suggesting that WJ can achieve similar clinical and procedural success rate,but with lower adverse effects,instrument changes,and intraprocedural coagulation devices[9].

Figure 1 Flow diagram with search results and selection criteria.

Figure 2 lt comprises a thinner and more compact tip as well as jet function to allow saline injection after cutting without the need to switch devices.

Current literature lacks high-quality evidence to compare clinical outcomes of WJ and TT knives in POEM used for esophageal dysmotility disorders.The purpose of our systemic review and metaanalysis is to compare WJ and TT in terms of procedural and clinical success,and determine whether fewer adverse events and instrument changes could be achieved with the decreased procedural duration.

MATERlALS AND METHODS

Study selection criteria

Studies using triangular tip knife with integrated water jet as the instrument for peroral endoscopic myotomy were selected.Inclusion criteria included both adults and children with an indication of esophageal motility disorders for POEM treatment.Each study used POEM for achalasia,while 1 study did include other indications of diffuse esophageal spasm,nutcracker esophagus,and non-relaxing lower esophageal sphincter.Studies included patients that had been treated with prior therapies before POEM,of which majority were pneumatic balloon dilation.

Data collection,extraction,and quality assessment

Studies were systemically searched independently by two investigators (Belopolsky Y and Puli SR) in Pubmed,Cochrane,and EMBASE.The search was performed from inception to May 2021.The search terms used were “peroral endoscopic myotomy” and “knife”.Each abstract and title were screened for eligibility.All references at the end of each selected article were explored manually to retrieve additional studies.Any differences among investigators were resolved by mutual agreement.The interobserver variability was 1.The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation methodology[10].The agreement between reviewers for the collected data gave a Cohen κ value of 1.0.

Statistical analysis

RESULTS

Characteristics of studies

A total of 61 studies were retrieved by our search strategy.We reviewed these and excluded 52 studies based on titles and abstracts and reviewed full texts of remaining 9 studies.Finally,7 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria[9,17-21].This consisted of 2 randomised controlled trial (RCT) and 5 retrospective single center cohorts published between 2012 and 2021.Five studies were published full text articles while two studies were available as abstract poster presentations.Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow chart to illustrate how final studies were selected.All pooled estimates were calculated using fixed and random effects models.The pooled effects estimated by both models were similar.All the pooled estimates given below are from the fixed effect model.Heterogeneity was assessed withIsquared,and publication bias with Egger’s test.

A total of 558 patients were included in this meta-analysis.The mean age of patients’ was 42.82 years (SD=7.86) in the TT group and 37.03 years (SD=12.29) in the WJ group,of which 59.57% were male in TTvs52.51% in WJ group.

This review analyzed the various outcomes including procedural success,clinical successes defined as ＜ 3 Eckardt score post-POEM,procedure duration,number of instrument exchanges,and usage of coagulation forceps.Most,but not all studies,included information on every variable that was analyzed.The studies that included information on the specific variable were included in the final analysis of that variable.

Clinical and technical success

Analysis showed weighted odds of technical success for POEM in TT group compared to WJ group to be 4.78 (95%CI=0.22-102.47).In terms of clinical success,the standard accepted definition is a score of three or below in Eckardt score.The TT group had weighted odds of clinical success compared to WJ of 0.93 (95%CI=0.29-2.97) (Figure 3).Publication bias calculated using Begg-Mazumdar gave Kendall’s tau b value of -0.33 (P=0.33).Heterogeneity calculated usingI2was 0 indicating no significant heterogeneity among studies.

Figure 3 Funnel plot for publication bias of clinical success of triangular tip knife and water-jet integrated triangular tip knife.

Procedural duration,number of instrument changes,and usage of coagulation forceps

Analysis of procedural duration for WJ had a weighted mean duration of 31.63 min (95%CI=29.44-33.82) as compared to TT with weighted mean duration of 50.45 min (95%CI=47.35-53.55).Regarding instrument changes,analysis showed a weighted number of instrument changes for TT of 11.92 times (95%CI=11.15-12.70)vsWJ with weighted number of instrument changes of 2.21 times (95%CI=1.98-2.45).The usage of coagulation forceps analysis showed for WJ the weighted usage of coagulation forceps to be 2.63 times,(95%CI=2.37-2.89)vsTT with weighted usage of coagulation forceps to be of 1.75 times (95%CI=1.52-1.97).

Adverse events

The overall adverse events of TT compared to WJ had a pooled OR of 2.34 (95%CI=1.34-4.23) (Figure 4).When evaluating the adverse event of subcutaneous emphysema,TT had a pooled OR of 1.46 (95%CI=0.83-2.59) compared to WJ.

Their hair was as white as the snow, and their flesh of an icy blue, and they mumbled17 and nodded in a kind of dream, and their frozen breath hung round them like a cloud

Figure 4 Forest Plot for assessing the odds ratio of adverse effects between usage of water-jet integrated triangular tip knife and triangular tip knife.

DlSCUSSlON

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared conventionally used triangular tip knife and a knife using new integrated water-jet technology,in terms of several peri- and post-procedural outcomes.There was comparable procedural as well as clinical success,defined as postoperative Eckardt score of 3 or lower.

By pooling data across studies,our meta-analysis showed that WJ had statistically decreased procedural time of 32 min as compared to the TT of 50 min.For the endoscopist,that could theoretically increase procedural productivity.In addition,our analysis showed that both instrument exchanges and usage of coagulation forceps were decreased in the WJ group when compared to the TT group.Likely this can partially explain the shorter procedural duration,as well as indicate less intra-procedural bleeding with the less use of coagulation instruments.

The frequently reported adverse events of POEM include pneumomediastinum,mucosal perforations,pneumothorax,mucosal perforations,and subcutaneous emphysema[22].In our meta-analysis,statistically adverse events were less likely to happen in the WJ group compared to the TT group.However,when examining one adverse event commented on in each study of subcutaneous emphysema,this was comparable among both groups as the confidence interval crossed one.Thus while overall adverse events were lower,it is difficult to discern which,if any,WJ could have lower risk of provoking.

Our study is the first in the literature to assess TT and WJ knives in POEM procedures for esophageal dysmotility disorders and analyze their effectiveness for the procedure.There are several strengths to our review.First,we included studies of WJ compared to standard TT technique,including 2 RCT.This allowed a more valuable comparison of procedural outcomes.Second,we conducted a systemic literature review with well-defined inclusion criteria,as well as careful exclusion of redundant studies with detailed extraction of data.Third,we separated studies that did not evaluate esophageal dysmotility disorders specifically,due to variable intra-procedural techniques that could have skewed the data.

While this study has included the most recent randomized controlled trials,these are few in our current available literature.Second,our conclusions apply to achalasia primarily,and did not include other indications for POEM other than those related to esophageal motility disorders.Finally,blinding of endoscopists was not possible and thus performance bias could have played a factor as well as inability to assess each performing endoscopist’s skill level.

CONCLUSlON

Water jet triangular tip knife has decreased procedural duration,number of instruments used,and usage of coagulation forceps over the conventional triangular tip knife.As such,this modality represents an attractive option for POEM.Our review represents the first review of the literature regarding water jet triangular tip knife in the management of esophageal dysmotility disorders using POEM.Collectively,the data supports using water jet triangular tip knife as a primary modality in terms of safety for the patient with less adverse events,with comparable technical and clinical success to the conventional triangular tip knife.

ARTlCLE HlGHLlGHTS

Research background

This study is the first metanalysis to discover the differences between two main modalities for performing peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Research motivation

This study allows us to continue progressing in terms of instruments as it leads to continued success,but quicker and less adverse outcomes.

Research objectives

To compare two knives,conventional triangular tip as well as water jet integrated triangular tip knives.

Research methods

Clinical trials were examined and put together into metaanalysis.

Research results

This shows that water jet knife is comparable in terms of success to conventional traditional triangular knife with fewer adverse events and faster time.

Research conclusions

This study proposes new availability in instruments to the field of endoscopic myotomy.

Research perspectives

This allows future research to examine additional instruments and how to continue to further clinical success with better outcomes as well as ease for the endoscopist.

FOOTNOTES

Author contributions:Belopolsky Y and Puli SR contributed equally and substantially to the conception and design of the work,analysis,acquisition,interpretation of data for the work,and drafting the work and revising for important intellectual content;Belopolsky Y and Puli SR agree to be accountable for all aspects of work in ensuring questions related to accuracy and integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved;all authors wrote,read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest statement:There is no conflict of interest from any of all authors.

PRlSMA 2009 Checklist statement:All authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist,and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.

Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers.It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute,remix,adapt,build upon this work non-commercially,and license their derivative works on different terms,provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial.See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Country/Territory of origin:United States

ORClD number:Yuliya Belopolsky 0000-0002-1867-763X;Srinivas R Puli 0000-0001-7650-6938.

S-Editor:Wang LL

L-Editor:A

P-Editor:Cai YX