APP下载

Physiological mechanism underlying spikelet degeneration in rice

2018-02-11

Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年7期

Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province/Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P.R.China

1. Introduction

Grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) is determined by four components: panicle number per unit area, spikelet number per panicle, seed-setting rate or filled grain percentage,and grain weight. Among the four components, panicle number per unit area is constrained by space conditions and exists a certain degree of saturation; grain weight or 1 000-grain weight is more controlled by genetic factors and shows relative stability for a cultivar; filled grain percentage is determined not only by water and nutrient supply but also by temperature and light conditions during maturity; while spikelet number per panicle has great potential of increases,due to its large variability and adjustability, and its increase has always been a main approach to achieve a higher grain yield in both breeding and culture (Yang and Zhang 2010; Wang 2011; Vriet et al. 2012; Gonzalez-Navarro et al.2015). The number of spikelet per panicle depends not only on the number of differentiated spikelets, but also on the degeneration rate of spikelets. In general, the number of degenerated spikelets accounts for 15–20% of the total differentiated spikelets. The spikelet degeneration rate can be 50–60% for some cultivars or under the unfavorable conditions such as high temperature or drought during and/or around meiosis (Matsushima 1980; Tan et al. 2011; Xie et al. 2013; Zhang C X et al. 2017; Zhang W Y et al. 2017;Zhang 2018).

The development of a young rice panicle can be divided into two main stages: the first stage is from panicle initiation(the neck-node differentiation stage) to the end of spikelet primordium differentiation, in which primary and secondary branches and spikelets are differentiated; and the second stage is from pistil and stamen differentiation to the heading stage. The elongation of branches and spikelets, formation of floral organs, meiosis, and the filling of pollen grains are completed, and spikelet degeneration also happens during this period (Matsushima 1980; Itoh et al. 2005).According to the degeneration time and position on a panicle,spikelet degeneration can be divided into two types: spikelet degeneration (preflowering floret abortion) and spikelet barrenness (Matsushima 1980; Itoh et al. 2005; Li et al.2009). Spikelet degeneration, including the degeneration of either some spikelets or all spikelets on a branch (branch degeneration), mainly occurs on the proximal branches of a panicle and during meiosis or at the base part of panicle in early young panicle development. In contrast, spikelet barrenness mainly happens on the distal branches of a panicle and from the filling of pollens to the heading or at the top of panicle in late young panicle development. The proportion of the two kinds of spikelet degeneration varies with rice cultivars and the conditions of panicle development. It is observed, however, that some modern rice cultivars that have numerous spikelets on a panicle have shown more spikelet barrenness (Itoh et al. 2005; Li et al. 2009; Tan et al. 2011;Wang et al. 2012). Either spikelet degeneration or spikelet barrenness can result in a substantial decrease in spikelet number, and consequently, a serious loss of grain yield (Tan et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012; Zheng et al. 2014, 2016; Zhang C X et al. 2017; Zhang W Y et al. 2017; Zhang 2018).

Spikelet degeneration occurs not only in rice, but also in other cereal crops such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) although the structure of inflorescence of spikelet among these crops is different. There are reports showing that 160–180 florets can usually be differentiated on a wheat spike, but approximately 70% of them could be degenerated, and in maize, floret degeneration or seed abortion rate could be as high as 30–50% (Wang 2011; Xie et al. 2013). Why do these crops degenerate so many spikelets or florets? Understanding the mechanism in which spikelet/floret degeneration occurs would have great significance in enhancing yield potential in cereals.

Therefore, taking rice as an example, the paper reviewed the physiological mechanism underlying spikelet degeneration,with focus on the roles of phytohormones in regulating the process.

2. Explanations for spikelet degeneration

2.1. Resource limitation

For a long time, the mechanism of spikelet degeneration in crops has been studied from different perspectives, and various explanations or hypotheses have been put forward(Matsushima 1980; Patel and Mohapatra 1992; Wang 2011).Among them, resource limitation is a classic assumption.It is proposed that spikelet degeneration in rice is mainly resulted from the constraint of resource or nutrient supply,and under such conditions, some late differentiated spikelets are at a disadvantage in competition for and could not get enough nutrients, leading to degeneration (Cock and Yoshida 1972; Singh and Jenner 1982; Ishimaru et al. 2005;Kamoi et al. 2008). There is a report showing that ozone stress inhibited rice spikelet differentiation and promoted spikelet degeneration, which was closely associated with decreased accumulation of nitrogen (N) and biomass during the panicle development (Wang et al. 2012). There are many reports, however, that serious degeneration of spikelets still happens even under the good condition of nutrient supply (Mohapatra et al. 1993; Afza et al. 2000;Xie et al. 2013; Zhang W Y et al. 2017; Zhang 2018). It is observed that spikelet degeneration in rice subjected to soil drying during the booting stage occurs neither by reduced assimilation nor by water deficits in the shoot, but by some chemical signals from roots to shoots (Kobata et al. 1994).These results imply that resource limitation only accounts partly for spikelet degeneration.

2.2. Self-organization

It is hypothesized that spikelet or floret degeneration in plants is a self-organized process, that is, the random migration of initial resources results in the imbalance of resource allocation among the developmental sinks, and this initial imbalance expands and forms the dominant level for the superior sinks that obtain more resources through autocatalytic process, which leads to the degeneration of inferior sinks that could not get enough resources(Caneshaiah and Uma 1994). Actually, however, spikelet degeneration in most cereals is not randomly. For example,spikelet degeneration happens at the base and the top of a rice panicle. In wheat, floret degeneration occurs at the distal position in a spikelet or at both base and top of a spike.Kernel abortion is mainly at the top of an ear in maize. These characteristics of spikelet or floret degeneration in cereals could not support the hypothesis of “random migration of initial resourcesself-organization processinferior sink degeneration”.

2.3. Roles of phytohormones in regulating spikelet degeneration

Five classic phytohormonesIt is generally believed that plant hormones are key regulators to seed development, and the roles of five classic plant hormones, auxins, cytokinins,gibberellins (GAs), abscisic acid (ABA), and ethylene, in regulating spikelet differentiation and degeneration have been documented (Brenner and Cheikh 1995; Yang et al.2001; Davies 2004; Pandey 2017). It is generally assumed that spikelet degeneration is a result of apical dominance or primigenic dominance (Bangerth 1989). In the hypothesis of primigenic dominance, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) export of the earlier developed sink is suggested to inhibit the IAA export of later developed sinks, and this depressed IAA-export of the subordinated fruit/sink acts as the signal that leads to inhibited development, and consequently, fruit or sink degeneration (Bangerth 1989; Finkelstein 2004).Using a mutant, aberrant spikelets and panicle1 (asp1), that exhibits disorganized branching patterns and phyllotaxy,abnormal morphology of spikelets and rachis, premature termination of spikelet development, and reduced numbers of mature spikelets and branches. Yoshida et al. (2012) have observed that ASP1 encodes a transcriptional co-repressor similar to Arabidopsis TOPLESS and TOPLESS RELATED genes, and auxin signaling and histone deacetylase action contribute partially to defective in the mutant. However,there are reports showing that the difference in IAA concentration in spikelets at different positions on a rice panicle is very small before ovaries are pollinated (Patel and Mohapatra 1992; Duan et al. 1999; Pandey 2017). Drought during meiosis significantly increased spikelet degeneration but IAA concentration was not significantly decreased in rice panicles (Yang et al. 2008). The spray of IAA could not alleviate spikelet degeneration when rice was grown under saline flooding conditions (Yokoyama et al. 2002).Moreover, spikelets on the top of a rice panicle that have higher concentration of IAA could also degenerate (Itoh et al.2005; Li et al. 2009; Tan et al. 2011). These results may be difficult to back the hypothesis that apical dominance causes floret degeneration.

Apart from IAA, cytokinins and GAs are considered as other two kinds of promoting phytohormones because they can generally enhance plant growth and development(Morris et al. 1993; Brenner and Cheikh 1995; Davies 2004;Pandey 2017). It is observed that application of GA3could suppress spikelet degeneration when rice subjected to saline flooding (Yokoyama et al. 2002) and pre-anthesis spraying 6-benzylaminopurine decreased floret degeneration rate in wheat (Zheng et al. 2014, 2016). However, other studies show that levels of GAs and zeatin+zeatin riboside (Z+ZR)in young rice panicles are not decreased although spikelet degeneration rate was significantly increased when the plants subjected to drought during meiosis (Yang et al.2008), and applying kinetin to rice plants could not decrease the spikelet degeneration caused by saline irrigation(Yokoyama et al. 2002).

In contrast to IAA, cytokinins, and GAs, both ethylene and ABA are generally regarded as inhibitory growth regulators(Trewavas and Jones 1991; Beltrano et al. 1994; Cheng and Lur 1996; Mohapatra et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2006a). A high ethylene evolution rate has frequently been related to floret degeneration or seed abortion in maize (Cheng and Lur 1996) and wheat (Xu et al. 1995; Beltrano et al. 1999),and spikelet degeneration in rice (Yang et al. 2006b, 2007a,2008). There is a report showing that the anthers located on the distal floret positions of a wheat spikelet contain higher ABA levels than those on the proximal positions, and the high ABA concentration is linked to the reduced grain set(Lee et al. 1988). Under water stress, an increase in floret abortion in wheat has been observed to be associated with an elevated level of ABA florets (Saini and Aspinall 1982;Ahmadi and Baker 1999). However, the work of Yang et al.(2007a, 2008) has shown that both ABA and ethylene are all enhanced in rice spikelets by water stress imposed during meiosis, but ethylene is enhanced more than ABA in a rice cultivar with a higher rate of spikelet degeneration when compared with a cultivar with a lower rate of spikelet degeneration. They observed that spikelet degeneration was significantly reduced when ABA or aminoethoxyvinylglycine(AVG), an inhibitor of ethylene synthesis, was applied to water-stressed panicles at the early meiosis stage, and application of ethephon, an ethylene-releasing agent, or fluridone, an inhibitor of ABA synthesis, had the opposite effect, and the spikelet degeneration rate was increased.It is argued that antagonistic interactions between ABA and ethylene may be involved in mediating the effect of water stress on spikelet degeneration. A higher ratio of ABA to ethylene would be a physiological trait of rice adaptation to water stress (Yang et al. 2007a, 2008).

New phytohormones of brassinosteroids (BRs) and polyamines (PAs)Both BRs and PAs are two types of important new phytohormones (Davies 2004; Wu et al.2008; Hou et al. 2013; Pandey 2017). It is believed that BRs are a group of naturally occurring novel plant steroid hormones comprising brassinolide, castasterone, and their various derivatives that play critical roles in a wide range of plant developmental processes including seed germination, vascular differentiation, pollen tube growth,nucleic acids and protein biosynthesis, and the production of flowers and fruit by producing an array of physiological changes (Jiang et al. 2013; Vriet et al. 2013; Zhao et al.2013; Fariduddin et al. 2014). There is a study showing that concentrations of 24-epicastasterone (24-epiCS) and 28-homobrassinolide (28-homoBL) in young rice panicles from panicle initiation to pollen mother cell meiosis were significantly and positively correlated with the number of spikelet differentiation, while significantly and negatively correlated with the percentage of spikelet degeneration(Zhang 2018). Changes in the levels of antioxidant system(AOS), proton-pumping ATPase activity, ATP concentration,and energy charge were consistent with the changes in 24-epiCS and 28-homoBL concentrations. The contents of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were opposite to the levels of 24-epiCS and 28-homoBL (Zhang 2018). Application of 24-epiCS or 28-homoBL to young panicles markedly increased the concentrations of 24-epiCS or 28-homoBL in the panicles, energy charge, AOS levels and spikelet differentiation, whereas significantly decreased the contents of H2O2and MDA and spikelet degeneration.The opposite effects were observed when an inhibitor of brassinosteroids biosynthesis, brassinazole, was applied(Zhang 2018). The results indicate that BRs play a vital role in promoting spikelet differentiation and supressing spikelet degeneration though enhancing AOS and energy charge during the panicle development period of rice.

PAs are well known to play important roles in many physiological processes, including cell division,morphogenesis, embryogenesis, fruit set and growth,senescence, and responses to environmental stresses(Yang et al. 2007b; Alcazar et al. 2010; Nambeesan et al.2012; Chen et al. 2013; Zhang W Y et al. 2017). The recent work of Zhang W Y et al. (2017) has shown that a moderate soil-drying (MD) treatment imposed from the onset of panicle initiation to the pollen completion stage could significantly increase spikelet differentiation and decrease spikelet degeneration compared to the well-watered treatment. The increase in spikelet differentiation and decrease in spikelet degeneration are closely associated with increases in contents of free spermidine (Spd), free spermine (Spm), the ratio of free putrescine (Put), and free-Spd or free-Spm to 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). When Spd or AVG, an inhibitor of ethylene synthesis, was applied to young panicles, the Spd and Spm contents and spikelet differentiation were increased, whereas ACC contents and spikelet degeneration were decreased significantly. The results were reversed when ACC or methylglyoxal-bis(guanylhydrazone), an inhibitor of Spd and Spm synthesis,was applied (Zhang W Y et al. 2017). The results suggest that antagonistic interactions between polyamines and ethylene respond to moderate soil-drying, and consequently,mediate spikelet development in rice.

It is proposed that salicylic acid (SA), another type of new plant hormone, may also be involved in regulating spikelet degeneration under abiotic stress. There is report showing that spraying SA to heat-stressed plants significantly increased concentrations of soluble sugars,proline, phytohormones including ABA, GA3, BRs, IAA, and ZR and activities of antioxidant enzymes in rice panicles,and reduced the spikelet degeneration rate (Zhang C X et al. 2017). However, the effect of applying SA on spikelet degeneration and grain yield was not detectable when plants were grown at normal growth conditions, suggesting that SA plays a role in alleviating spikelet degeneration only under heat stress.

It should be noteworthy that the structure of inflorescence of spikelet in rice is largely differed with that in wheat and maize (Smith 1995). In rice, spikelet is equal to floret since one spikelet consists of one floret. In wheat, one spikelet is consisted of 7–10 florets. Several distal florets of them are degenerated. In ear of maize, one spikelet is consisted of two florets. The difference in the structure of inflorescence among cereal crops may have different mechanisms in spikelet or floret degeneration.

3. Cultivation techniques for reducing the degeneration of spikelets in rice

Studies on the agronomic practices to regulate the differentiation and degeneration of rice spikelets are mainly concentrated on N application and water management(Matsushima 1980; Saini 1997; Ghaley 2012; Ferrante et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2017; Zhang W Y et al. 2017). It is observed that application of N fertilizer at panicle initiation could increase spikelet differentiation,while applying N from pistil and stamen differentiation to meiosis could significantly reduce spikelet degeneration(Matsushima 1980; Ghaley 2012; Zhang et al. 2013).The growth stage of meiosis is generally believed to be very sensitive for rice to respond environment changes,and spikelet degeneration will be substantially increased subjected to drought or to high/low temperature during this period (Saini 1997; Saini and Westgate 2000; Yokoyama et al. 2002; Boyer and Westgate 2004; Yang et al. 2007a).Some studies have shown that spikelet abortion and barrenness also happen when rice plants encounter unfavorable conditions from the filling of pollen grains to the heading stage, and therefore, rice plants are usually well-watered from meiosis to flowering to protect spikelets from degeneration and sterility (Itoh et al. 2005; Li et al.2009; Tan et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012; Zhang W Y et al.2017). There are reports showing, however, that moderate soil drying or adoption of the irrigation with alternate wetting and moderate drying, that is soil water potential is not lower than –15 kPa or midday leaf water potential is not lower than–1.2 MPa, could promote spikelet differentiation and suppress spikelet degeneration, leading to more number of spikelets on a rice panicle when compared with continuous flooding (Zhang et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2013,Wang et al. 2016; Zhang W Y et al. 2017; Zhang 2018).Other cultivation techniques, such as proper plant density,could also decrease spikelet degeneration by reducing the difference between the differentiated and degenerated spikelets per panicle (Matsushima 1980; Horie et al. 2005;Tang et al. 2017). The mechanism underlying the effect of N application, water management, and plant density on spikelet degeneration, however, is yet to be understood.

4. Concluding remarks

Spikelet degeneration is a serious physiological defect and a major constraint in the grain production of cereals (Li et al.2009; Tan et al. 2011; Wang 2011; Zhang W Y et al. 2017;Zhang 2018). Elucidating the mechanism underlying spikelet degeneration is a big difficult problem of science (Wang 2011). Although some investigations have been made on the causes of spikelet degeneration, the mechanism remains unclear. Phytohormones play important roles in regulating spikelet degeneration (Brenner and Cheikh 1995; Yang et al.2001; Davies 2004; Pandey 2017). However, knowledge on the cross-talk among/between hormones in enhancing or suppressing spikelet degeneration is very limited. Further investigations are needed to: (1) understand the cross-talk among/between phytohormones, especially the interaction among BRs, PAs, and ethylene on spikelet degeneration;(2) reveal the physiological and molecular mechanism in which phytohormones and their interactions regulate the degeneration of spikelets; and (3) exploit approaches to decrease spikelet degeneration and to elucidate their mechanism.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471438 and 31771710), the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program,2014AA10A605), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300206-4), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China (PAPD), and the Top Talent Supporting Program of Yangzhou University, China (2015-01).

Afza R, Shen M, Zapata-Arias F J, Xie J, Fundi H, Lee K S,Bobadilla-Mucino E, Kodym A. 2000. Effect of spikelet position on rice anther culture efficiency. Plant Science,153, 155–159.

Ahmadi A, Baker D A. 1999. Effects of abscisic acid (ABA) on grain filling processes in wheat. Plant Growth Regulation,28, 187–197.

Alcazar R, Altabella T, Marco F, Bortalotti C, Reymond M, Koncz C, Carrasco P, Tiburcio A F. 2010. Polyamines: Molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance.Planta, 231, 1237–1249.

Bangerth F. 1989. Dominance among fruits/sinks and the search for a correlative signal. Physiologia Plantarum, 76, 608–614.

Beltrano J, Carbone A, Montaldi E R, Guiamet J J. 1994.Ethylene as promoter of wheat grain maturation and ear senescence. Plant Growth Regulation, 15, 107–112.

Beltrano J, Ronco M G, Montaldi E R. 1999. Drought stress syndrome in wheat is provoked ethylene evolution imbalance and reversed by rewatering, aminoethoxyvinylglycine, or sodium benzoate. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation,18, 59–64.

Boyer J S, Westgate M E. 2004. Grain yield with limited water.Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2385–2349.

Brenner M L, Cheikh N. 1995. The role of hormones in photosynthate partitioning and seed filling. In: Davies P J, ed., Plant Hormones, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,The Netherlands. pp. 649–670.

Caneshaiah K N, Uma S R. 1994. Seed and fruit abortion as a process of self-organization among developing sinks.Physiologia Plantarum, 91, 81–89.

Chen T T, Xu Y J, Wang J C, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H. 2013. Polyamines and ethylene interact in rice grains in response to soil drying during grain filling. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 2523–2538.

Cheng C Y, Lur H S. 1996. Ethylene may be involved in abortion of the maize caryopsis. Physiologia Plantarum,98, 245–252.

Cock J H, Yoshida S. 1972. Accumulation of14C labeled carbohydrate before flowering and the subsequent redistribution in the rice plant. Proceedings of Crop Science Society of Japan, 41, 226–234.

Davies P J. 2004. Introduction. In: Davies P J, ed., Plant Hormones, Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action!Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.pp. 1–35.

Duan J, Tian C, Liang C, Huang Y, Liu H. 1999. Dynamic changes of endogenous plant hormones in rice grains in different parts of panicle at grain filling stage. Acta Botanica Sinica, 41, 75–79. (in Chinese)

Fariduddin Q, Yusuf M, Ahmad I, Ahmad A. 2014.Brassinosteroids and their role in response of plants to abiotic stress. Biologia Plantarum, 58, 9–17.

Ferrante A, Savin R, Slafer G A. 2013. Floret development and grain setting differences between modern durum wheats under contrasting nitrogen availability. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 169–184.

Finkelstein R R. 2004. The role of hormones during seed development and germination. In: Davies P J, ed., Plant Hormones, Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action!Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.pp. 513–517.

Ghaley B B. 2012. Uptake and utilization of 5-split nitrogen topdressing in an improved and a traditional rice cultivar in the Bhutan Highlands. Experimental Agriculture, 48,536–550.

Gonzalez-Navarro O E, Griffiths S, Molero G, Reynolds M P, Slafer G A. 2015. Dynamics of floret development determining differences in spike fertility in an elite population of wheat. Field Crops Research, 172, 21–31.

Horie T, Shiraiwa T, Homma K, Katsura K, Maeda Y, Yoshida H. 2005. Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that showed in the 1980s? Plant Production Science, 8,259–274.

Hou Z, Liu G, Hou L, Wang L, Liu X. 2013. Regulatory function of polyamine oxidase-generated hydrogen peroxide in ethylene-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12, 251–262.

Ishimaru T, Hirose T, Matsuda T, Goto A, Takahashi K,Sasaki H, Terao T, Ishii R, Ohsugi R, Yamagishi T. 2005.Expression patterns of genes encoding carbohydratemetabolizing enzymes and their relationship to grain filling in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Comparison of caryopses located at different positions in a panicle. Plant and Cell Physiology,46, 620–628.

Itoh J, Nonomura K, Ikeda K, Yamaki S, Inukai Y, Yamagishi H,Kitano H, Nagato Y. 2005. Rice plant development: From zygote to spikelet. Plant & Cell Physiology, 46, 23–47.

Jiang W B, Huang H Y, Hu Y W, Zhu S W, Wang Z Y, Lin W H. 2013. Brassinosteroid regulates seed size and shape in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 162, 1965–1977.

Kamoi T, kenzo T, Kuraji K. 2008. Abortion of reproductive organs as an adaptation to fluctuating daily carbohydrate production. Oecologia, 154, 663–677.

Kobata T, Tanaka S, Utumi M, Hara S, Imaki T. 1994. Sterility in rice (Oryza sativa L.) subject to drought during the booting stage occurs not because of lack of assimilate or of water-deficit in the shoot but because of dehydration of the root-zone. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 63, 510–517.

Lee B T, Martin P, Bangerth F. 1988. Phytohormones levels in the florets of a single wheat spikelet during pre-anthesis development and relationships to grain set. Journal of Experimental Botany, 39, 927–933.

Li S, Qian Q, Fu Z, Zeng D, Meng X, Kyozuka J, Maekawa M, Zhu X, Zhang J, Li J, Wang Y. 2009. Short panicle1 encodes a putative PTR family transporter and determines rice panicle size. The Plant Journal, 58, 592–605.

Liu L J, Chen T T, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C, Zhang J H.2013. Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice.Field Crops Research, 154, 226–235.

Matsushima S. 1980. Rice Cultivation for the Million. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo. pp. 9–152.

Mohapatra P K, Patel R, Sahu S K. 1993. Time of flowering affects grain quality and spikelet partitioning within the rice panicle. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 20,231–242.

Mohapatra P K, Naik P K, Patel R. 2000. Ethylene inhibitors improve dry matter partitioning and development of late flowering spikelets on rice panicles. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27, 311–323.

Morris R D, Blevins D G, Dietrich J T, Durly R C, Gelvin S B,Gray J, Hommes N G, Kaminek M, Mathews L J, Meilan R, Reinbott T M, Sagavendra-Soto L. 1993. Cytokinins in plant pathogenic bacteria and developing cereal grains.Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 20, 621–637.

Nambeesan S, AbuQamar S, Laluk K, Mattoo A K, Mickelbart M V, Ferruzzi M G, Mengiste T, Handa A K. 2012. Polyamines attenuate ethylene-mediated defense responses to abrogate resistance to botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant Physiology, 158, 1034–1045.

Pandey G K. 2017. Mechanism of Plant Hormone Signaling Under Stress. Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey. pp. 1–459.

Patel R, Mohapatra P K. 1992. Regulation of spikelet development in rice by hormones. Journal of Experimental Botany, 43, 257–262.

Saini H S. 1997. Effects of water stress on male gametophyte development in plants. Sexual plant Reproduction, 10,67–73.

Saini H S, Aspinall D A. 1982. Sterility in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) induced by water deficit or high temperature:Possible mediation by abscisic acid. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9, 529–537.

Saini H S, Westgate M E. 2000. Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advances in Agronomy, 68,59–96.

Singh B K, Jenner C F. 1982. Association between concentration organic nutrients in the grain, endosperm cell number and grain dry weight within the ear of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9, 83–95.

Smith C W. 1995. Crop Production: Evolution, History, and Technology. John Viley & Sons, New York. pp. 1–286.

Tan C J, Sun Y J, Xu H S, Yu S B. 2011. Identification of quantitative trait locus and epistatic interaction for degenerated spikelets on the top of panicle in rice. Plant Breeding, 130, 177–184.

Tang L, Gao H, Hirooka Y, Homma K, Nakazaki T, Liu T S,Shiraiwa T, Xu Z J. 2017. Erect panicle super rice varieties enhance yield by harvest index advantages in high nitrogen and density conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,16, 1467–1473.

Trewavas A J, Jones H G. 1991. An assessment of the role of ABA in plant development. In: Davies W J, Jones H G,eds., Abscisic Acid: Physiology and Biochemistry. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford. pp. 169–188.

Vriet C, Russinova E, Reuzeaua C. 2012. Boosting crop yields with plant steroids. The Plant Cell, 24, 842–857.

Vriet G, Russinova E, Reuzeau C. 2013. From squalene to brassinolide: The steroid metabolic and signaling pathways across the plant kingdom. Molecular Plant, 6, 1738–1757.

Xie R J, Deng L, Jing L, He S L, Ma Y T, Yi S L, Zheng Y Q,Zheng L. 2013. Recent advances in molecular events of fruit abscission. Biologia Plantarum, 57, 201–209.

Xu Z Z, Yu Z W, Qi X H, Yu S L. 1995. Effect of soil drought on ethylene evolution, polyamine accumulation and cell membrane in flag leaf of winter wheat. Acta Physiologia Sinica, 21, 295–301. (in Chinese)

Wang Y X, Yang L X, Kobayashi K, Zhu J G, Chen C P, Yang K F, Tang H Y, Wang Y L. 2012. Investigations on spikelet formation in hybrid rice as affected by elevated tropospheric ozone concentration in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 150, 63–71.

Wang Z M. 2011. Mechanism and regulation of the degeneration product organs in crops. In: Editorial Board of Agricultural Science of 10000 Difficult Problems of Science, ed., 10000 Difficult Problems of Science, Agricultural Science Volume.Science Press, Beijing. pp. 111–114. (in Chinese)

Wang Z Q, Zhang W Y, Beebout S S, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H. 2016. Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice as influenced by irrigation regimes and their interaction with nitrogen rates. Field Crops Research,193, 54–69.

Wu C Y, Trieu A, Radhakrishnan P, Kwok S F, Harris S, Zhang K,Wang J, Wan J, Zhai H, Takatsuto S, Matsumoto S, Fujioka S, Feldmann K A, Pennella R I. 2008. Brassinosteroids regulate grain filling in rice. The Plant Cell, 20, 2130–2145.

Wu M, Liu M, Liu J, Li W T, Jiang C Y, Li Z P. 2017. Optimize nitrogen fertilization location in root-growing zone to increase grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of transplanted rice in subtropical China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16,2073–2081.

Yang J C, Zhang J H. 2010. Grain filling problem in “super” rice.Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 1–5.

Yang J C, Liu K, Zhang S F, Wang X M, Wang Z Q, Liu L J. 2008.Hormones in rice spikelets in responses to water stress during meiosis. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 34, 111–118. (in Chinese)

Yang J C, Zhang J H, Liu K, Wang Z Q, Liu L J. 2006a. Abscisic acid and ethylene interact in wheat grains in response to soil drying during grain filling. New Phytologist, 271, 293–303.

Yang J C, Zhang J H, Liu K, Wang Z Q, Liu L J. 2007a. Abscisic acid and ethylene interact in rice spikelets in response to water stress during meiosis. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 26, 318–328.

Yang J C, Zhang J H, Liu K, Wang Z Q, Liu L J. 2007b.Involvement of polyamines in the drought resistance of rice.Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 1545–1555.

Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Liu K, Wang P. 2006b. Postanthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in rice in relation to abscisic acid and ethylene. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 149–160.

Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S, Wang W. 2001.Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Physiology, 127, 315–323.

Yokoyama C, Tsuda M, Hirai Y. 2002. Effects of plant growth regulators on number of spikelets per panicle in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under saline flooding conditions. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 71, 376–382.

Yoshida A, Ohmori Y, Kitano H, Taguchi-Shiobara F, Hirano H Y. 2012. ABERRANT SPIKELET AND PANICLE1, encoding a TOPLESS-related transcriptional co-repressor, is involved in the regulation of meristem fate in rice. The Plant Journal,70, 327–339.

Zhang C X, Feng B H, Chen T T, Zhang X F, Tao L X, Fu G F. 2017. Sugars, antioxidant enzymes and IAA mediate salicylic acid to prevent rice spikelet degeneration caused by heat stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 83, 313–323.

Zhang H, Xue Y G, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Yang J C, Zhang J H.2009. An alternate wetting and moderate soil drying regime improves root and shoot growth in rice. Crop Science, 49,2246–2260.

Zhang W Y. 2018. Mechanism underlying water and nitrogen regulating spikelet development and grain filling of rice.Ph D thesis, Yangzhou University, China. pp. 12–96. (in Chinese)

Zhang W Y, Chen Y J, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. 2017. Polyamines and ethylene in rice young panicles in response to soil drought during panicle differentiation. Plant Growth Regulation, 82, 491–503.

Zhang Z J, Chu G, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Wang X M, Zhang H,Yang J C, Zhang J H. 2013. Mid-season nitrogen application strategies for rice varieties differing in panicle size. Field Crops Research, 150, 9–18.

Zhao J, Wu C, Yuan S, Yin L, Sun W, Zhao Q, Zhao B,Li X. 2013. Kinase activity of OsBRI1 is essential for brassinosteroids to regulate rice growth and development.Plant Science, 199–200, 113–120.

Zheng C F, Zhu Y J, Wang C Y, Guo T C. 2016. Wheat grain yield increase in response to pre-anthesis foliar application of 6-benzylaminopurine is dependent on floret development.PLoS ONE, 11, e0156627.

Zheng C F, Zhu Y J, Zhu H J, Kang G Z, Guo T C, Wang C Y.2014. Floret development and grain setting characteristics in winter wheat in response to pre-anthesis applications of 6-benzylaminopurine and boron. Field Crops Research,169, 70–76.