Ready,Set,Go!

By+Clifford+A.+Kiracofe

Beijing and Washington both expect the Mar-a-Lago meeting to move China-U. S. relations forward. Although there are differences on some issues， there are also opportunities for agreement on an overall framework for near term and long term relations.

The day and a half meeting at the fashionable resort in Palm Beach， Florida， opened with a dinner on April 6， hosted by President Donald Trump， and was followed by wide-ranging discussions the next day.

The meeting is a logical follow-up for both countries to the China-U.S. informal meeting hosted by then President Barack Obama in California in June 2013. Occurring at the very beginning of Trumps presidency， it is an opportune “get to know you” visit.

At the 2013 meeting， President Xi Jinping put forward the concept of building China-U.S. relations based on mutual respect， win-win cooperation， non-confrontation and non-confl ict. Such a concept is designed to avoid confrontation between major powers and to foster cooperation. The Obama administration agreed to， but did not advance， the concept. Instead， it chose to press ahead with the confrontational“pivot” policy， which was promoted by many think tanks linked to the U.S. military-industrial complex， not to mention hawkish politicians.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson， during his recent visit to Beijing， initiated the process of arranging the Mar-a-Lago event and was well received by the Chinese side. Tillerson uses the term “framework” to describe the U.S. interest in establishing a constructive relationship between the two countries.

Tillersons emphasis on establishing a framework with long term vision was emphasized during a press briefi ng on the eve of the summit by Acting Assistant Secretary of State Susan Thornton. “He was talking about the two leaders coming together at this summit … to set a new course for U.S.-China relations for the next 40 to 50 years，” she said.

The U.S. perspective apparently is in alignment with the Chinese sides desire for a new and constructive relationship. Thus， the prospects for working toward such a goal seem good. Both sides have emphasized the concepts of mutual benefi t and mutual respect， which are central to constructive diplomatic engagement.

Basically， the two sides agree that stabilization of relations on a long term basis is essential. Given the changing international situation and the multipolar trend in world affairs， experts in both countries hope for such a development.

Highly provocative actions by North Korea have inevitably placed the Korean Peninsula issue high on the agenda. “The problem has really become very urgent，” Thornton said. “It is destabilizing to the entire region and actually further than the region now.”

U.S. concern is now deeper than ever， owing to North Koreas development of long-range missile capabilities.

Economic issues also ranked high on the meetings agenda. During his election campaign， Trump made scathing comments about what he deemed “unfair” Chinese trade practices and “currency manipulation.” But the International Monetary Fund has said that China is not engaging in currency manipulation.

Many countries have diffi cult and complex trade issues but normally solve them through negotiation or referral to the World Trade Organization. Both tracks are presently being used by China and the U.S.

The investment issue is an important factor in relations. China and the United States are engaged in the process of negotiating a bilateral investment treaty （BIT）. With a new administration in Washington now in place， these negotiations can move forward. Not only will the Trump administration have to review the prior negotiations of the Obama administration， it will also have to add its own ideas and requirements.

The China-U.S. Security and Economic Dialogue process has a number of mechanisms relating to trade and economic relations. These can be energized by the new Trump administration， which says it is results oriented.

In the U.S.， critics of the Trump administration complained that the Florida venue was not appropriate. These critics have a short memory， given Obamas choice of venue for the previous informal meeting.

An informal format allows leaders to relax and to develop a personal relationship， offi cials say. “We want to have them establish a good working relationship， so that they can in times of both opportunity and crisis reach out to one another and have a good rapport，” Thornton said.

Unlike the 2013 meeting， which Michelle Obama did not attend， the Mar-a-Lago event included both fi rst ladies. Given their mutual deep interest in the arts， establishing positive rapport and common ground should come naturally.

U.S. critics of the Trump administration also faulted the timing of the meeting， saying that it was taking place too soon. But， the president has been meeting a number of world leaders， including the leaders of J apan and the UK， the president of Egypt and the king of Jordan.