APP下载

Effect of co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma Huh7

2016-04-19ChangJiangLeiChunYaoDeKeLiZhiXiongLongYuanLiDanTaoYanPingLiouJiangZhouZhangNingLiu

Chang-Jiang Lei, Chun Yao, De-Ke Li, Zhi-Xiong Long, Yuan Li, Dan Tao, Yan-Ping Liou, Jiang-Zhou Zhang, Ning Liu

1Tumor laboratory, the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan 430050, Hubei Province, China

2Wuhan Hematology Institute, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China

3Department of Anesthesiology, the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China

4Oncology Departmen, the Fifth Hospita of Wuhan, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China

Effect of co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma Huh7

Chang-Jiang Lei1#, Chun Yao2#, De-Ke Li3#, Zhi-Xiong Long4*, Yuan Li1, Dan Tao4, Yan-Ping Liou4, Jiang-Zhou Zhang4, Ning Liu1

1Tumor laboratory, the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan 430050, Hubei Province, China

2Wuhan Hematology Institute, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China

3Department of Anesthesiology, the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China

4Oncology Departmen, the Fifth Hospita of Wuhan, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China

ARTICLE INFO

Article history:

Received 15 May 2016

Received in revised form 16 June 2016

Accepted 1 July 2016

Available online 20 September 2016

MiR-520c-3p

MiR-132

Liver cancer

Proliferation

Apoptosis

Objective: To investigate the effects of co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma Huh7. Methods: Hepatocellular carcinoma Huh7 was cultured in vitro and lipidosome was used to transfect miR-520c-3p and miR-132 respectively or together. The ef f ects of transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on proliferation and apoptosis of Huh7 were detected by CCK8 and Annexin V staining and fl ow cytometry, and the expression level of the targeted gene of over-expressed miR-520c-3p and miR-132 was determined by Western blot and realtime PCR. Results: Compared with the control group, the proliferation ability of Huh7 of the single transfected and co-transfected miR-520c-3p and miR-132 decreased signif i cantly, and the apoptosis ratio increased distinctly(P<0.05). Besides, the af f ect of the co-transfection group was better than that of the single transfection group. The protein levels of GPC3 (Glypican-3) and YAP (Yes-associated protein), the target genes transfected only by miR-520c-3p and miR-132, respectively, reduced obviously (P< 0.05), which was similar with the co-infected cells, but cells transfected by miR-132 only showed a decrease of YAP. Conclusions: The co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 can target-regulate the expression of GPC3 and YAP, enhance the exhibition ef f ect on proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma Huh7 and induce cell apoptosis synergistically.

1. Introduction

To Liver cancer is a common malignancy worldwide with high morbidity and mortality rates which brings heavy burdens tosocieties and families. In our country, there is a severe trend of carcinogenic risks such as hepatitis B infection. Its morbidity rate reaches about 5-10 times as much as that in developed countries. The death toll from liver cancer accounts for about 50% of the total [1,2]. Traditional surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy do not work ideally. A large amount of researches have proved that many microRNA are closely related to the growth, metastasis and microenvironment of tumors [3-5]. Therefore, microRNA has been the ef f ective target tool for inhibiting the growth and metastasis of tumors. There are researches demonstrating that miR-520c-3p and miR-132 express abnormally in hepatocellular carcinoma and are related to the proliferation, apoptosis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma [6, 7]. This study aimed to investigate the correlation of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 in the proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by using them to co-transfecthepatocellular carcinoma Huh7 and explore its mode of action.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Huh7 used in this study was provided by Shanghai Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences; fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, trypsin, DMEM medium and Opti-MEM were all purchased from Gibco-BRL and transfection reagent LipofectamineTM2000, Trizol reagent and Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kits were bought from Invitrogen; the primer was designed and compounded by Sangon Biotech; reverse transcription kits and fl uorescence quantitation kits were from Takara; miR-520c-3p, miR-132 mimics and mimics negative controls were all bought from Ribobio (Guangzhou, China); rabbit-anti-human GPC3, YAP,GAPDH primary antibody and HRP secondary antibody were from Abcam (USA); ECL luminescent solution was purchased from Pierce.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Cell culture

A DMEM medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum was prepared. The frozen Huh7 cells were taken out from the liquid nitrogen tank and thawn repeatedly and rapidly in a water bath at 37 ℃. Then, 10 mL preheated complete culture medium absorbed from the super clean bench was taken to a centrifuge tube, washed to remove DMSO of the cell suspension and centrifuged at 1 000 r/min for 5 min. After that,the supernatant was discarded. Moderate culture solution was added to re-suspend cells and then it was moved to the culture fl ask and cultured conventionally at 37 ℃ in 5% CO2incubator. The solution was changed on the next morning. When Huh-7 grew and fused to a single layer, it was washed by PBS to have digestive transfer culture by 0.25% trypsin.

2.2.2. MiR transfection

MiR-520c-3p, miR-132 mimics and mimics negative control freeze-dried powder was made into 20 μM stock solution by RNasefree H2O and stored respectively to avoid repetitive freeze-thawing. The day before transfection, Huh-7 cells were incubated to 24-well plate or 96-well plate holes containing complete medium and transfected when the cell concentration reached 70% with the mimic concentration of 100 nM and three complex holes. A total of 50 μL Opti-MEM was applied to dilute miR and LipofectamineTM2000 blowing and absorbing slightly for 3-5 times till it was mixed evenly. The transfection reagent and miR diluent were mixed, also blew and absorbed slightly for 3-5 times till it was mixed evenly, and placed still at room temperature for 5 min. Then, the mixed solution was added into the primary culture medium. The transfection rate was detected after 24 hours and the cell biological characteristics were tested after 48 hours.

2.2.3. Detection of CCK8 cell viability

A total of 10 μL CCK8 solution was added into every well on the 96-well plate after transfecting for 48 h with the greatest extent to avoid bringing air bubbles. The culture plate was incubated in a incubator for 2 h. A microplate reader was employed to determine the absorbance at 450 nm.

Cell viability (%) = [A(mimic)-A (blank)]/[A(negative control)-A(blank)]×100.

2.2.4. Examination of cell cycle

The cells were washed by 0.25% trypsin-digested pre-cooling PBS 3 times after transfected for 48 h to make monoplast suspension with a adjusted cell number of (1-5)×106cells/mL. Pre-cooling absolute ethanol solution was added in it slowly to a fi nal concentration of 75%. The sample was blended uniformly and placed in the freezer at -20 ℃ overnight. At the next day, the fi xed sample was taken out and centrifuged at 1 000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded. Then, 3 mL pre-cooling PBS resuspended cells was added and centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5 min. Also, the supernatant was discarded. In every tube, 200 μL RNaseA (300 g/mL) resuspended cells was added respectively and incubated for 30 min. RNA in the sample was removed. In addition, 150 μL PI dye liquor was added in every tube and stained in dark place at 4 ℃ for 20 min. After washed, fl ow cytometry (BD FACSCalibur) was used for the detection.

2.2.5. Apoptosis detected by Annexin V and PI stain

Cells were collected after trypsin digestion and centrifuged at 1 000 r/min for 5 min and the supernatant was discarded. Cells were suspended gently by PBS and counted. 1×Annexin V bind buf f er was prepared. Then, 150 μL of the buf f er was added into every tube to suspend cells. The mixed solution of 45 μL buf f er and 5 μL Annexin V-FITC was added into every tube, blended equally and dyed in dark place at 4 ℃ for 20 min. After that, 10 μL PI solution was added into every tube and mixed evenly. After incubated in dark place at room temperature for 10-20 min, 200 μL buffer was added into every tube and fi nally fl ow cytometry was applied to test the apoptosis condition.

2.2.6. Realtime PCR

After transfection of Huh7, Trizol method was used to extract the total RNA. Takara reverse transcription kits were used to conduct reverse transcription in accordance with the instruction strictly. Primer sequences used for reverse transcription and realtime PCR were designed and compounded by Ribobio (Guangzhou, China). SYBR realtime PCR was conducted by ABI7500. U6 was used as a internal reference for the expression levels of miR-520c-3p and miR-132, while GAPDH served as the internal reference for the expression levels of GPC3 and YAP. The experiment results were analyzed by the 2-ΔΔ△△Ctmethod.

2.2.7. Western blot

The culture medium was removed after transfection for 48 h. The cells were washed by PBS. A total of 200 μL 1×RIPA lysis buf f er was added into every well respectively to incubate at 4 ℃ for 30 min. Afterwards, a pipettor was used to buf f et the cells repeatedly and the lysis buf f er was moved to the EP tube and stored at -80 ℃. After testing the protein concentration by Bradford method, equal protein was used to conduct SDS denatured polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis with a constant voltage electrophoresis of 60 V for 30 min and 120 V for 1 h. After that, the protein was transfered nitrocellulose membrane(Millipore) with transmembrane of 350 mA for 2 h. Five percentage of skim milk was enclosed to incubate specific GPC3 or YAP primary antibodies at 4 ℃overnight and HRR secondary antibody was incubated after washing. ECL developer was used.

2.2.8. Data analysis

Streamed data were analyzed by FlowJo software. All data in this study were statistically analyzed with Graphpad Prism 4.0. Means between groups were tested by Student's t-test. Means of three or more than three groups were analyzed by ANOVA (P<0.05). Dif f erences were statistically signif i cant. Measurement data were expressed by Mean ± SD.

3. Results

3.1. The transfection effect of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 mimic

The results of realtime PCR showed that as compared to the negative control group the level of miR-520c-3p of Huh7 transfected only by miR-520c-3p mimic or co-transfected increased by about 150 times, while the expression level of miR-132 of Huh7 transfected only by miR-132 mimic or co-transfected increased by about 240 times (Table 1), which indicated the success of mimic transfection.

Table 1The expression of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 and cell viabilities of Huh7 after transfected with miR-520c-3p and miR-132.

3.2. Cell viabilities of hepatoma carcinoma Huh7 after cotransfected by miR-520c-3p and miR-132

CCK8 was used to detect the cell viabilities of Huh7 after transfected 48 h. The results showed that the cell viabilities of Huh7 of the miR-520c-3p group and miR-132 group decreased signif i cantly as compared with the control group. The cell viability of the co-transfection group declined most distinctly (Table 1),which proved that the over expression of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 could inhibit the proliferation of Huh7.

3.3. Effect of the co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on the cell cycle of hepatoma carcinoma Huh7

In order to conf i rm the correlation of the cell cycle and decrease of cell viability of Huh7 caused by miR-520c-3p and miR-132,Ethidium bromide was used to dye the treasfected cells to analyze the cell ratios of all cell cycles. It was found that single transfection of miR-520c-3p or miR-132 could lead to the increase in the cell ratio during G1 phase and decreases in the phases starting from S (P< 0.05), while the cell cycle of the co-transfection group showed a apparent block phenomenon (Table 2), which indicated that the cotransfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 could inhibit cell cycle ef f ectively.

Table 2Cell cycle distribution of Huh7 after transfected with miR-520c-3p and miR-132 (Mean±SD, %).

3.4. Effect of the co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on apoptosis of hepatoma carcinoma Huh7In order to further explore the ef f ect of co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on apoptosis of Huh7, we applied Annexin V and PI staining to test its apoptosis level. It was showed in Table 3 that transfections of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 could all cause apoptosis of hepatoma carcinoma Huh7, and the cell proportion between early apoptosis and late apoptosis increased obviously(P<0.05), and the apoptosis of the co-transfection group presented most signif i cant.

Table 3Apoptosis of Huh7 cells after transfected by miR-520c-3p and miR-132(Mean±SD, %).

3.5. The expressions of GPC3 and YAP of Huh7 after cotransfected by miR-520c-3p and miR-132

Meanwhile, western blot and realtime PCR were used respectively to detect the protein levels of target molecule GPC3 and YAP and the level of mRNA of Huh7 after transfected by miR-520c-3p and miR-132. As a result, we found that the the protein level of GPC3 in Huh7 transfected by miR-520c-3p mimic decreased distinctly,while its mRNA level did not changed, and its protein level of YAPand its mRNA level all declined significantly. The levels of GPC3 and mRNA of the co-transfection group remained unchanged, while its protein level and YAP expression level reduced in the same time(Table 4).

Table 4Expression of GPC3 and YAP in Huh7 cells after transfected by miR-520c-3p and miR-132.

4. Discussion

MicoRNA is a non-coding single-stranded small RNA with a total length of 18-25 bp which regulates the expression of target genes by inducing the degradation of target gene RNA or interdicting the translation process [8]. With the maturity of high throughput sequencing technology and the analysis of the expression prof i le of miRNA in human tumors, the dif f erential expression of miRNA and its relationship with the early diagnosis and prognosis of tumors have attached more and more attentions. Researchers have manifested that multiple miRNA expresses abnormally in liver cancer. They participate in the occurrence and development of cancers by adjusting apoptosis and cell cycle or regulating the expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The expression level of miRNA can be used a mark for tumor diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. For instance, the expressions of miR-21, miR-122 and miRNA-101 are correlated to tumor invasion and the increase of recurrence risks [9-11]. Moreover, miRNA in blood or serum cannot be dissociated by RNA enzyme, which made it more convenient to get and easier to operate. MiRNA tested by peripheral blood is of great importance to the early diagnosis of liver cancer. For example,miR-223, miR-122 and miR-192 possess high accuracy in detecting early hepatocellular carcinoma [12, 13]. Results of animal experiments also prompted that miR-26a, miR-122 and miR-124 could serve as potential therapeutic targets to extend the survival time for mice. However, the interaction and mode of action of dif f erent miRNA in hepatoma carcinoma cells still remain unclear. It was found in this study the co-ef f ection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 on hepatoma carcinoma Huh7 could inhibit proliferation and stimulate apoptosis of hepatoma carcinoma cells.

MiR-520c-3p is considered as a negative regulatory factor in the growth of tumors, which presents a low expression in diffuse B cell lymphoma, transcribes initiation factor eIF4GII by targeting regulation and inhibits the formation of cell colonies and the growth of tumors [14]. GPC3 is a transmembrane glycoprotein of cell surface inducing physiological functions such as lymphocytes homing and extracellular matrix adhesion, and its high expression is closely related to tumorigenesis and neoplasm metastasis [15]. There were researches confirming that miR-520c-3p could inhibit the expression of GPC3 by targeting in hepatoma carcinoma to inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of hepatoma carcinoma [7]. It was also found in this study that the cell cycle of miR-520c-3p-overexpressed hepatoma carcinoma Huh7 was inhibited signif i cantly, its apoptosis ratio increased obviously, and the protein level of its target gene GPC3 declined distinctly. At the same time, we found that after the over expression of miR-520c-3p, the expression of the core molecule YAP of the Hippo signal pathway reduced dramatically,which indicated that the expression of YAP was inhibited at the time the expression of GPC3 reduced. The results were in agreement with those of the previous studies.

MiR-132 usually expresses high in nerve-related tissues participating in the growth of axon, proliferation and dif f erentiation of synapse and angiogenesis and possessing certain functions in immune regulation [16,17]. Studies have revealed that miR-132 can also participate in the occurrence and development of tumors and expresses low in tumor tissues of prostate cancer, liver cancer and so on [18]. In prostatic cancer cells, miR-132 can decrease the expression of pro-survival genes HB-EGF and TALIN2 to facilitate tumor apoptosis[19]. MiR-132 can signif i cantly inhibit the in-vitro migration and invasion of lung carcinoma cell through the silence of the expression of ZEB2 [20]. In hepatoma carcinoma cells, dualluciferase report experiments proved that miR-132 could combined with 3’UTR of YAP gene directly to inhibit the expression of YAP so as to inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells [6]. We have obtained similar results in this study that Huh7 with over-expressed miR-132 presented cell cycle arrest and a increase of apoptosis and the levels of mRNA and protein of YAP reduced signif i cantly.

Hippo signal pathway is a cell signal pathway discovered in fruit fl ies. The pathway participates in the growth, dif f erentiation and regeneration of tissues and organs and the maintenance of the stability of proliferation and apoptosis of body cells. Researches have pointed out that the abnormal regulation of Hippo signal pathway is closely related to the occurrence, development, apoptosis and metastasis of tumors [21, 22]. YAP is the downstream protein playing a key role in the Hippo pathway. The increase of its expression can lead to the increase of the downstream transcription factor cyclinE[23], which means that YAP can facilitate cell proliferation,inhibit cell apoptosis and promote malignant transformation. More and more evidences have implied that YAP, as a oncogene, presents high expression in many human tumors such as colon cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, liver cancer, etc., and the high expression of YAP in liver cancer is closely related to the dif f erentiated degree of liver cancer and high-serum AFP [24-26]. After YAP over expresses in normal mammary epithelium, cells can be over-productive, which facilitates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and inhibits cell apoptosis [27]. Disturbing the expression of YAP in tumor cells can inhibit the growth and metastasis of tumors [28]. Hence, to explore the intervention of the YAP expression lever to reduce tumor cells may provide theoretical basis for treating liver cancer. The results of this study revealed that single transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 can decrease the levels of YAP protein and mRNA signif i cantly,inhibit the proliferation of hepatoma carcinoma cells and induce apoptosis. The effect of the co-transfection of miR-520c-3p andmiR-132 was more remarkable, which indicated the regulation ef f ect of the target protein GPC3 of miR-520c-3p on YAP and the silence ef f ect of miR-132 on YAP had a synergistic anti-tumor effi cacy in hepatoma carcinoma Huh7.

In conclusion, it is found in this study that the co-transfection of miR-520c-3p and miR-132 can inhibit the expression level of YAP together, suppress the proliferation of hepatoma carcinoma synergistically and promote apoptosis of hepatoma carcinoma. The study results of this paper also suggest that the ef f ects of dif f erent miRNA are networked in tumor cells. Based on their dif f erent action modes, their biological functions may overlap with each other, which provides the theoretical basis for the molecular intervention method for oncotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conf l ict of interst.

[1] Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA-Cancer J Clin 2015; 65(2): 87-108.

[2] Chen JG, Zhang SW. Liver cancer epidemic in China: past, present and future. Sem Cancer Biol 2011; 21(1): 59-69.

[3] Rupaimoole R , Calin GA , Lopez-Berestein G , Sood AK. miRNA deregulation in cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov 2016; 6(3): 235-246.

[4] Shields BB, Pecot CV, Gao H , McMillan E , Potts M , Nagel C, et al. White. A genome-scale screen reveals context-dependent ovarian cancer sensitivity to miRNA overexpression. Mole Syst Biol 2015; 11(12): 842.

[5] Aakula A, Kohonen P, Leivonen SK, Makela R, Hintsanen P, Mpindi JP,et al. Systematic identif i cation of micrornas that impact on proliferation of prostate cancer cells and display changed expression in tumor tissue. Eur Urol 2016; 69(6):1120-1128.

[6] Lei CJ, Li L , Gao X, Zhang J, Pan QY, Long HC, et al. Hsa-miR-132 inhibits proliferation of hepatic carcinoma cells by targeting YAP. Cell Biochem & Funct 2015; 33(5): 326-333.

[7] Miao HL, Lei CJ, Qiu ZD, Liu ZK , Li R , Bao ST, et al. MicroRNA-520c-3p inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and invasion through induction of cell apoptosis by targeting glypican-3. Hepatol Res 2014; 44(3): 338-348.

[8] Fabian MR, Sonenberg N, Filipowicz W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Ann Rev Biochem 2010; 79: 351-379.

[9] Wang SC , Lin XL, Li J, Zhang TT, Wang HY, Shi JW, et al. MicroRNA-122 triggers mesenchymal-epithelial transition and suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma cell motility and invasion by targeting RhoA. PloS one 2014; 9(7): e101330.

[10] Zhang Y, Guo X, Xiong L, Kong X, Xu Y, Liu C, et al. MicroRNA-101 suppresses SOX9-dependent tumorigenicity and promotes favorable prognosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. FEBS Lett 2012; 586(24): 4362-4370.

[11] Huang CS , Yu W, Cui H , Wang YJ, Zhang L , Han F, et al. Increased expression of miR-21 predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Experiment Pathol 2015; 8(6): 7234-7238.

[12] El-Abd NE, Fawzy NA , El-Sheikh SM , Soliman ME. Circulating miRNA-122, miRNA-199a, and miRNA-16 as biomarkers for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Mol Diagn & Ther 2015; 19(4): 213-220.

[13] Zhou J, Yu L , Gao X , Hu J, Wang J, Dai Z, et al. Plasma microRNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(36): 4781-4788.

[14] Mazan-Mamczarz K, Zhao XF, Dai B, Steinhardt JJ, Peroutka RJ, Berk KL, et al. Down-regulation of eIF4GII by miR-520c-3p represses dif f use large B cell lymphoma development. PLoS Genet 2014; 10(1): e1004105.

[15] Pan Z, Chen C, Long H, Lei C, Tang G, Li L, et al. Overexpression of GPC3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and invasion through induction of apoptosis. Mol Med Rep 2013; 7(3): 969-974.

[16] Li D , Wang A , Liu X , Meisgen F, Grunler J, Botusan IR , et al. MicroRNA-132 enhances transition from inf l ammation to proliferation during wound healing. J Clin Invest 2015; 125(8): 3008-3026.

[17] Hancock ML , Preitner N , Quan J, Flanagan JG. MicroRNA-132 is enriched in developing axons, locally regulates Rasa1 mRNA, and promotes axon extension. J Neurosci 2014; 34(1): 66-78.

[18] Wei X , Tan C , Tang C , Ren G , Xiang T, Qiu Z , et al. Epigenetic repression of miR-132 expression by the hepatitis B virus x protein in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cellular Signal 2013;25(5): 1037-1043.

[19] Formosa A, Lena AM , Markert EK, Cortelli S, Miano R, Mauriello A ,et al. DNA methylation silences miR-132 in prostate cancer. Oncogene 2013; 32(1): 127-134.

[20] You J, Li Y, Fang N, Liu B, Zu L, Chang R, et al MiR-132 suppresses the migration and invasion of lung cancer cells via targeting the EMT regulator ZEB2. PloS one 2014; 9(3): e91827.

[21] Poon CL, Mitchell KA, Kondo S, Cheng LY, Harvey KF. The Hippo pathway regulates neuroblasts and brain size in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol: CB 2016; 26(8): 1034-1042.

[22] Kang W, Cheng AS, Yu J, To KF. Emerging role of Hippo pathway in gastric and other gastrointestinal cancers. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22(3): 1279-1288.

[23] Zhang J, Ji JY, Yu M. Overholtzer M, Smolen GA, Wang R, et al. YAP-dependent induction of amphiregulin identif i es a non-cell-autonomous component of the Hippo pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11(12): 1444-1450.

[24] Avril T, Chevet E. Proteostasis trumps YAP in colon cancer. Sci Signal 2015; 8(397): fs18.

[25] Han SX, Bai E, Jin GH , He CC , Guo XJ, Wang LJ, et al. Expression and clinical significance of YAP, TAZ, and AREG in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014: 261365.

[26] Steinhardt AA, Gayyed MF, Klein AP, Dong J, Maitra A, Pan D, et al. Expression of Yes-associated protein in common solid tumors. Hum Pathol 2008;39(11): 1582-1589.

[27] Overholtzer M, Zhang J, Smolen GA , Muir B , Li W, Sgroi DC , et al. Transforming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11q22 amplicon. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103(33): 12405-12410.

[28] Zhou Z, Zhu JS, Gao CP, Li LP, Zhou C, Wang H, et al. siRNA targeting YAP gene inhibits gastric carcinoma growth and tumor metastasis in SCID mice. Oncol Lett 2016; 11(4): 2806-2814.

10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.07.015

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Chang-Jiang Lei, Tumor laboratory, the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan 430050, Hubei Province, China.

Tel:18271483056

E-mail:hdhhv4577@126.com

*Corresponding author: Zhi-Xiong Long, Oncology Departmen, the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, 430050, Hubei Province, China.

Tel: 18271483056

E-mail:jgjjgg7698@126.com

Foundation Project: This study was supported by Supported by Education Department of Hubei Province science and technology research project (NO. B2015230), Applied Fundamental Research Project of Wuhan Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No. 2015061701011630), Medical Scientific Research Project of Health and Familly Planning Commission of Wuhan Municipality (Grant No. WX16E12) and the fourth batch of “Hanyang Talent Associate Program”.