Can palliative radiotherapy influence prostate-specific antigen response in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with systemic therapy (chemotherapy or abiraterone)?—a report of three cases

Mohan Hingorani, Sanjay Dixit, Pattu Pugazhenthi, Simon Hawkyard, Andrew Robertson, Richard Khafagy

1Department of Clinical Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull and East Yorkshire, NHS Trust, Cottingham, East Riding of Yorkshire,HU16 5JQ, UK; 2Department of Urology, Scarborough District General Hospital, Scarborough ON M1P 2V5, UK

Introduction

The last decade has witnessed the development of several novel therapeutic strategies for the management of castrateresistant prostate cancer (CRPC); these strategies include abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, immunomodulatory therapy(sipuleucel-T), cabazitaxel, and radium-2231-3.However, the role of palliative radiotherapy (pRT) in castrate-resistant disease remains poorly defined.pRT is often employed for the palliation of metastatic bone lesions in CRPC, resulting in a relief of pain in about 80%-90% of patients combined with a reduction in analgesic requirement4.However, published evidence on the induction of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response following pRT for metastatic bone disease is lacking.In this report, we describe three cases of CRPC developing biochemical progression upon systemic chemotherapy and abiraterone in whom fractionated pRT to bone lesions was followed by induction of PSA response and restoration of response to systemic treatment.

Case reports

All patients had castrate-resistant disease which previously progressed on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)analogue therapy and maximal androgen blockade (MAB),and two patients had also previously received diethylstilbestrol.All patients had received at least two previous lines of therapy.Two patients were receiving salvage treatment with palliative chemotherapy using docetaxel and one patient was on abiraterone acetate.All patients were also receiving synchronous prednisolone, bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid), and LHRH analogue therapy.Patient and disease-related characteristics combined with initial management and subsequent lines of therapy are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient and disease-related characteristics combined with initial management and subsequent lines of therapy

Patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy received up to four cycles (three weekly), and the patient on abiraterone acetate received 10 weeks of treatment.All patients showed evidence of symptomatic and rapid biochemical progression with increasing PSA velocity and doubling time of less than 6 weeks, thereby raising a strong argument for the discontinuation of salvage systemic treatment.However, all patients were referred for fractionated pRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) because of increasing bone pain.Two patients received radiotherapy to the spine, and one patient received radiotherapy to the pelvis.Chemotherapy was interrupted during radiotherapy, and docetaxel was recommenced in patients at least 2 weeks after completion of radiotherapy.However, the patient receiving abiraterone acetate continued with treatment during radiotherapy.The PSA kinetics during systemic treatment and following completion of radiotherapy are displayed in Figure 1.

Figure 1 PSA kinetics before and after fractionated pRT that was delivered during systemic treatment with docetaxel chemotherapy (A and B) and abiraterone (C).PSA, prostate specific antigen; pRT, palliative radiotherapy.

Figure 2 Bone scan appearances (case 1) during the treatment course demonstrate response to systemic chemotherapy after pRT for metastatic bone disease.(A) Bone scan prior to starting chemotherapy (PSA =106 ng/mL); (B) Bone scan after four cycles of chemotherapy showed no change, but patient developed increasing bone pain with rapid biochemical progression (PSA =220 ng/mL); (C) Bone scan performed after pRT, and further six cycles of chemotherapy showed a significant reduction in uptake (PSA =30 ng/mL).pRT, palliative radiotherapy; PSA, prostate specific antigen.

Following completion of radiotherapy, a dramatic biochemical response was observed with a marked reduction in PSA levels in all patients, which was associated with symptomatic response and clinical improvement.The biochemical response after radiotherapy was striking, with PSA reducing to 30%-60% from baseline peak levels within 6 weeks of completion of treatment.All patients recommenced previous systemic therapy, and subsequent treatment cycles were associated with preserved biochemical response and disease stabilization on repeat staging investigations (Figure 2).In addition, all patients experienced symptomatic benefits with resolution of bone pain and improvement in performance status and overall quality of life.Two patients remained in biochemical remission 4 and 7 months after completion of pRT, and the remaining patient developed biochemical relapse at 8 months after completion of radiotherapy.The two patients receiving docetaxel completed the originally intended 10 cycles of chemotherapy, and the remaining patient remained on abiraterone more than 12 months after initiation of therapy.

Discussion

The possibility of pRT influencing metastatic disease has been reported previously in the context of metastatic melanoma5.Radiotherapy has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects, with radiation-induced cell death inducing the release of endogenous danger signals known as damage-associated molecular patterns, which may augment the presentation of tumor antigens released from necrotic tumor cells in the presence of inflammatory milieu characterized by neutrophils,lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and increased systemic levels of cytokines (i.e., interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor).Therefore, radiation can promote the development of tumorspecific immune-active phenotype with initiation of an“abscopal” bystander effect at distant sites from radiation6.Ludgate et al.7hypothesized that these mechanisms may be accentuated in prostate cancer in the presence of an androgendeprived environment.Radiation-mediated immunological upregulation in prostate cancer tumor cells may be enhanced in the presence of fractionated radiotherapy compared with single fraction8.

The aforementioned cases demonstrated remarkable similarity in terms of advanced castrate-resistant disease and signs of rapid disease progression on systemic therapy prior to fractionated pRT for metastatic bone disease.Subsequently,these patients demonstrated an excellent response with marked reduction in PSA levels that matched the rate of progression and PSA velocity prior to radiotherapy.The probability of delayed PSA response to systemic therapies remains a distinct possibility in this situation.However, the paradoxical and extremely rapid levels of PSA reduction are relatively uncommon in the context of systemic treatment of prostate cancer.The timing and unusual nature of the PSA response does raise the provocative probability of likely association with immune stimulatory effects of pRT that may promote a synergistic interaction between radiation and systemic therapy.Indeed, the possible existence of such a phenomenon may enable the exploration of several novel therapeutic strategies in the future management of CRPC.

Conflict of Interest Statement

No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

1.Papatsoris AG, Karamouzis MV, Papavassiliou AG.Novel biological agents for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).Curr Med Chem 2005;12:277-296.

2.Nemes A, Tomuleasa C, Kacso G.The androgen receptor remains a key player in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.Implications for new treatments.J BUON 2014;19:357-364.

3.Mukherji D, El Dika I, Temraz S, Haidar M, Shamseddine A.Evolving treatment approaches for the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - role of radium-223.Ther Clin Risk Manag 2014;10:373-380.

4.Moser L, Schubert T, Hinkelbein W.Hormone-refractory and metastatic prostate cancer - palliative radiotherapy.Front RadiatTher Oncol 2008;41:117-125.

5.Stamell EF, Wolchok JD, Gnjatic S, Lee NY, Brownell I.The abscopal effect associated with a systemic anti-melanoma immune response.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;85:293-295.

6.Finkelstein SE, Fishman M.Clinical opportunities in combining immunotherapy with radiation therapy.Front Oncol 2012;2:169.

7.Ludgate CM.Optimizing cancer treatments to induce an acute immune response: radiation Abscopal effects, PAMPs, and DAMPs.Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:4522-4525.

8.John-Aryankalayil M, Palayoor ST, Cerna D, Simone CB 2nd,Falduto MT, Magnuson SR, et al.Fractionated radiation therapy can induce a molecular profile for therapeutic targeting.Radiat Res 2010;174:446-458.