Gastrointestinal stromal tumors and second primary malignancies before and after the introduction of imatinib mesylate

Jacopo Giuliani,Andrea Bonetti

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)is the most common mesenchymal malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract.GISTs may coexist with different types of cancer,either synchronous or metachronous (1).Most GISTs develop in a sporadic fashion,but familial occurrence,such as neurofibromatosis and Carney-triad,has also been reported (2).The overall frequency of second tumors in different series varied from 4.5% to 33%.The most frequent types of GIST-associated cancers were gastrointestinal carcinomas (47%),lymphoma/leukemia (7%),carcinomas of prostate (9%),breast (7%),kidney (6%),lung (5%),female genital tract (5%),carcinoid tumors (3%),soft tissue and bone sarcomas (3%),malignant melanoma (2%)and seminoma (1%)(1,3-5).

Since 2002 (FDA approved),imatinib mesylate,a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that competitively inhibits KIT,BCR-ABL,ARG,PDGFR,and PDGFR tyrosine kinases (6-9),has changed the natural history of the disease (10,11)and has become the standard treatment for unresectable metastatic GISTs.Improving longevity in patients with GIST,imatinib introduced questions concerning the development of second primary malignancies (SPMs)in these patients.Different studies have demonstrated a small risk of second cancers in patients receiving therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for hematologic malignancies,especially for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)(12),but the actual risk of developing SPMs for GIST-patients treated with imatinib is unknown.

Recently,Phan et al.(13)have analyzed in a critical way the topic of the incidence of SPMs after GIST in pre-imatinib (1992-2001)and after imatinib (2002-2009)era.They found that the rate of SPMs after GIST in the imatinib era was 7.07%,compared with the rate of 1.15%that occurred in the pre-imatinib era and it was statistically significant (P=0.030).Previously,other authors (14)were involved in the issue; in fact,in a prospective,observational study of imatinib therapy for unresectable and metastatic GISTs (a total of 70 patients were enrolled between December 2001 and December 2009)they found that 10.0%of GIST-patients suffered from second malignancies and they concluded saying that physicians should pay attention to the occurrence of second malignancies during imatinib therapy for GISTs.However,Phan et al.(13)are the first to statistically compare pre and post imatinib era.In particular,this difference was mainly accounted for a higher incidence of colon adenocarcinoma in the imatinib era (P=0.023).Renal cell carcinoma also accounted for this difference,but the relationship between imatinib and renal cancers is less clear.In contrast,the rate of the melanoma of the skin was significantly lower in the imatinib era compared with preimatinib era (P=0.030),probably because a small percentage of melanomas demonstrate activating mutations of KIT,for which imatinib demonstrates significant efficacy (15,16).

According to the present knowledge,the main cause for the increased incidence of SPMs in the imatinib era is explained by the increased survival of patients with metastatic GISTs and therefore more time available to develop SPMs,as supposed by other authors (13).This was also confirmed by Phan et al.(13): in facts,in the multivariable logistic regression analysis,they found that age was the most important factor related to someone’s odds of developing an SPM or not in any time period:patients who were older had a 3.7% greater odds per year of developing an SPM and patients with SPMs were more likely to be alive (62.5%)and with a greater number of months of survival (mean =70.83 months)than those without SPMs (45.68%,mean =39.33 months),and it was statistical significant (P＜0.0001).In addition the higher incidence may also be related to increased medical surveillance following primary diagnosis.

However,there is an important limitation concerning diagnosis; in particular GISTs were not able to be distinguished from other gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors prior to widespread use of c-kit staining,and were often misclassified.Add to this the surveillance bias,which may have affected the incidence of SPMs in patients who already carried a primary diagnosis of cancer.Also we must not forget that we are talking about rare cancers and,therefore,with a lower degree of scientific evidence with respect to the most frequent pathologies.

In conclusion,we can consider the topic of the incidence of SPMs after GIST in pre-imatinib and after imatinib era as clinically relevant.Based on the knowledge available today,the main cause for the increased incidence of SPMs in the imatinib era is explained by the increased survival of patients with metastatic GISTs and therefore more time available to develop SPMs.Nevertheless,it is necessary to investigate the mechanisms leading to the more frequently development of certain tumors than other.

Acknowledgements

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1.Agaimy A,Wünsch PH,Sobin LH,et al.Occurrence of other malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Semin Diagn Pathol 2006;23:120-9.

2.Carney JA.Gastric stromal sarcoma,pulmonary chondroma,and extra-adrenal paraganglioma (Carney Triad): natural history,adrenocortical component,and possible familial occurrence.Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:543-52.

3.Kaffes A,Hughes L,Hollinshead J,et al.Synchronous primary adenocarcinoma,mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and a stromal tumor in a Helicobacter pyloriinfected stomach.J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17:1033-6.

4.Maiorana A,Fante R,Maria Cesinaro A,et al.Synchronous occurrence of epithelial and stromal tumors in the stomach: a report of 6 cases.Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:682-6.

5.Lin YL,Tzeng JE,Wei CK,et al.Small gastrointestinal stromal tumor concomitant with early gastric cancer: a case report.World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:815-7.

6.Buchdunger E,Cioffi CL,Law N,et al.Abl proteintyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 inhibits in vitro signal transduction mediated by c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000;295:139-45.

7.Heinrich MC,Griffith DJ,Druker BJ,et al.Inhibition of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase activity by STI 571,a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor.Blood 2000;96:925-32.

8.Druker BJ,Tamura S,Buchdunger E,et al.Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells.Nat Med 1996;2:561-6.

9.Okuda K,Weisberg E,Gilliland DG,et al.ARG tyrosine kinase activity is inhibited by STI571.Blood 2001;97:2440-8.

10.Perez EA,Livingstone AS,Franceschi D,et al.Current incidence and outcomes of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors including gastrointestinal stromal tumors.J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:623-9.

11.Artinyan A,Kim J,Soriano P,et al.Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of imatinib:improved survival and elimination of socioeconomic survival disparities.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:2194-201.

12.Verma D,Kantarjian H,Strom SS,et al.Malignancies occurring during therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)and other hematologic malignancies.Blood 2011;118:4353-8.

13.Phan K,Martires K,Kurlander DE,et al.The incidence of second primary malignancies after gastrointestinal stromal tumor before and after the introduction of imatinib mesylate.Transl Cancer Res 2013.[Epub ahead of print].

14.Kanda T,Ishikawa T,Hirota S,et al.Prospective observational study of imatinib therapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors:long-term follow-up and second malignancy.Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012;42:578-85.

15.Carvajal RD,Antonescu CR,Wolchok JD,et al.KIT as a therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma.JAMA 2011;305:2327-34.

16.Guo J,Si L,Kong Y,et al.Phase II,open-label,singlearm trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring c-Kit mutation or amplification.J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2904-9.