The preparation and characterization of folate-conjugated human serum albumin magnetic cisplatin nanoparticles ☆

Daozhen Chen, Qiusha Tang, Wenqun Xue, Jingying Xiang, Li Zhang, Xinru Wang

a Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Toxicology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210042, China b Clinical Laboratory ,Wuxi Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care Affiliated Nanjing Medical University,Wuxi, Jiangsu,214002, China; c Medical School Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.Received 3 November 2009

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic drug loaded nanoparticles are an ideal type of formulation for targeting drugs for chemotherapy. The drug distribution of such a formulation can be changed by applying a magnetic field, concentrating the drug at the tumor sites. Such formulations can also delay drug release and reduce any toxic effect of the drug. The formulation can be designed to use receptors as targets, producing a drug delivery system that is specifically targeted.Among the various nanoparticle colloidal systems,those based on proteins may be particularly promising because of their biodegradability, lack of toxicity and antigenicity, stability, and shelf life, providing controllable drug-release properties and high loading capacity for hydrophilic molecules[1].

To solve the problem of site-specific targeting for the colloidal systems, some authors have attempted to increase the tissue specificity of colloidal drug carriers by coupling targeting agents. Among the possible targeting agents, folic acid could be exploited to realize delivering drugs into cancer cells. Folic acid is a low molecular weight (441 Da) vitamin whose receptor is frequently overexpressed in human cancer cells. This receptor has been identified as a tumor marker, especially in ovarian carcinomas, and it is highly restricted in most normal tissues[2].

In the present study, we first conjugated folate with human serum albumin (HSA) to prepare folateconjugated HSA, then made use of its capsule to encapsulate magnetic nanoparticles and cisplatin to prepare folate-conjugated magnetic cisplatin nanoparticles. The preparation process and related characteristics were investigated, and these will be used to lay the foundation for further study, including determining the mechanism of the nanoparticles intake by tumor cells and their distribution in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Instruments

Startorious 17-1 type electronic balance (Germany),UV-2201 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan),Malvern-2000 Laser Scattering particle size analyzer(UK), HITACHI H-600 transmission electronic microscope (TEM) (Japan), CQ50 ultrasonic cleaner(Shanghai Ultrasonic Instrument Factory, China) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Shimadzu, Japan).

Agents and reagents

HSA (Shanghai Shenggong Biotech Co., Ltd.,China), Sephadex G-250 (Pharmacia), EDC(Shanghai Sanjie Bio-tech Co., Ltd. ,China),folic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), trypsase (Acros Organics, USA), cisplatin for injection (Shandong Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ,China), standardized cisplatin (China Pharmaceutical Bio-products Evaluation Institute, China), and the other reagents were analytically pure.

Preparation and characterization of folateconjugated human serum albumin (Folate-HSA)

Folic acid (30 mg) was dissolved in 1,000 μl phosphate buffer solution (pH 9.0). After the folate was completely dissolved, EDC was added to the folate solution at the molar ratio of 6：1, mixed fully and activated for 15 min. Then 5 ml PBS solution(pH 9.0) of 50 mg/ml HSA was added into the above solution, and allowed to react with each other for 2 h while stirring. The above reaction solution was separated through a Sephadex G-250 dextran gel column, and the light yellow opalescent mobile phase was collected. The light yellow opalescence was due to the Folate-HSA. The degree of conjugation of the Folate-HSA was calculated as described elsewhere[3].

Preparation and characterization of magnetic material

Preparation of magnetic material

A previously described method was used[4]. Under N2gas, FeCl3·6H2O and FeCl2·4H2O were dissolved in deionized water at a ratio of n(Fe2+) ： n(Fe3+)=2：1,by magnetic mixing. Ammonia water (0.4M) was then slowly dripped into the molysite solution, which was hydrolyzed, generating a large number of black crystal particles. The ammonia water was then dripped into the above solution again, and the pH adjusted to make the solution alkaline. The material was aged at 80°C in a water bath, magnetically separated, and then washed several times by centrifugation. The wet precipitate was put into an acid solution, and finally a brown colloidal sol was obtained by peptization at 60°C.

Characterization of magnetic material

Morphology of nanoparticles was observed by TEM, and the nanoparticle physical properties studied with XRD (analytical conditions： Cu target; testing voltage： 40kV; current： 30mA; λ = 1.542), The nanoparticle composition was analyzed by SEM-EDS(testing conditions： accelerating voltage： 15KeV; takeoff angle： 25.693°; live time： 210 seconds; dead time：13.658 seconds).

Preparation and characterization of folateconjugated human serum albumin magnetic cisplatin nanoparticles (Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs)

Preparation of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs

As previously described[5], 250 mg Folate-HSA,100 mg magnetic powder and 25 mg cisplatin were mixed thoroughly, and the volume adjusted to 25 ml and the pH to 9.0; next, 150 ml anhydrous alcohol was slowly added at room temperature (1 ml/min), and the mixture was stirred for half an hour, at which time the solution appears hazy. 50 μl glutaraldehyde was added slowly with continuous stirring and cured for 12 h. The reaction solution was centrifuged at 7 100 g,and the precipitate washed three times with water, and dried under vacuum. Finally, reserve samples were maintained as described below.

Magnetic test of prepared Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs

As described elswhere[6], nanoparticles were added into normal saline (10 mg/ml), with ultrasonic mixing.Then one drop of nanoparticles was placed onto a slide and observed with an inverted microscope.Nanoparticles were uniformly distributed in the solution. Then a permanent magnet with a surface magnetic field strength of 5 000 gauss was placed on one side of the drop on the slide, and the motion of the nanoparticles was observed microscopically.

Morphological observation of prepared Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs

A thoroughly mixed suspension of prepared Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs was taken and dripped on to a copper mesh EM grid, negatively stain with 2%phosphotungstic acid at room temperature, and the nanoparticle morphology observed and imaged with a HITACHI-600 transmission electron microscope.

Particle size analysis of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs

A thoroughly mixed suspension of prepared Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs was added to 100 ml distilled water, and the particle size distribution of the nanoparticles was determined with a laser particle size analyzer.

Testing of drug loading volume and in vitro drug release property

Standard curve

Cisplatin standard solutions were obtained by diluting a 0.04 g/L aqueous CDDP solution to make standards of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 μg/ml. 20 μl of the standard solutions was injected into the high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) and linear regression was used to fit a standard curve of area (A)vs concentration (C). Chromatographic conditions：mobile phase, methanol： 0.9% sodium chloride solution (80：20, V/V); flow rate： 1.0 ml/min, sampling volume： 20 μl, test wave length 310 nm.

Test of drug loading volume

The Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs were ultrasonically homogenized in saline and then dispersed in 0.5% pepsin solution (or washed three times by centrifugation), digested in a water bath at 37±1°C for 2 h, and then centrifuged at 25 000 g for 20 min.The supernatant fluid was taken and diluted, and 20 μl supernatant fluid used for HPLC determination.The sample cisplatin content was calculated, and the drug loading volume and encapsulating rate were determined using the following formulae： drug loading volume = cisplatin content in albumin nanoparticles/weight of albumin nanoparticles×100%;encapsulation rate = cisplatin content in albumin nanoparticles/original dose×100%

Investigation of in vitro drug release

Magnetic cisplatin albumin microspheres (60 mg)were added to normal saline, then ultrasonically homogenized, centrifuged, dispersed in a final volume of 4 ml normal saline, and then transferred to a dialysis bag.The bag was suspended in a conical bottle with 25 ml normal saline with constant-rate stirring (150 r/min) at(37±1)°C. Samples (3 ml) were periodically taken and a corresponding volume replaced. HPLC was used to determine the CDDP concentration and calculate the drug release volume and accumulated drug release fraction using a regression equation, and an in vitro drug release curve was obtained. The release of CDDP from raw cisplatin solution was similarly investigated.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software (Version 16.0, SPSS Inc., USA). The model fitting of the nanoparticle drug release behavior in vitro pharmacokinetics was calculated by 3p87 software (Chinese Pharmacologic Society).

RESULTS

Degree of conjugation of Folate-HSA

The Folate-HSA conjugate was prepared successfully (Fig. 1). The average folate conjugated with HSA was 45.8 μg/mg HSA, and the percentage of the folate that conjugated on the surface of HSA nanoparticles was 27.26%.

The ultraviolet elution curve of the Folate-HSA passed through a Sephadex-G250 dextran gel column(Fig. 1) showed two distinct peaks, the first peak corresponding to conjugated Folate-HSA, and the second peak corresponding to non-reacted folate. As shown in Fig. 1, Folate-HSA was completely separated from non-reacted folate and other impurities.

Fig. 1 Folate-HSA ultraviolet elution curve

Characterization of magnetic material

Morphological observation of Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticles

Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticles exhibited high electron density and a round shape under TEM (Fig. 2A). Some nanoparticles aggregated, but their size was uniform with diameters in the range of 10-20 nm.

Surface energy spectrum analysis of Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticles

SEM-EDS analysis is shown in Fig. 2B： the percentages of iron and oxygen in Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticles were 73.77% and 26.23% respectively,which were consistent with those in Fe3O4. The finding confirmed the successful preparation of Fe3O4.Physical phase analysis

X-ray diffraction (Fig. 2C) of prepared ferrite magnetic nanoparticles showed sharp diffraction peak,demonstrating good crystallization. Face distance(d value) corresponding to each diffraction peak coincides with that of 19-629 of powder diffraction file (PDF) (the code represents spinel magnetic Fe3O4) compiled by JCPDS, demonstrating that our experiment had successfully prepared spinel Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticles.

Characterization of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNP

Under TEM, nanoparticles were found to have a round shape, uniform size and smooth surface (Fig.3A)The TEM results analysed by the laser particle size analyzer are shown in Fig. 3B: the maximum particle size was 140 nm and minimum particle size was 30 nm,while 80% of microspheres were between 60-90 nm,and showed good dispersity. Their average size was 79±8.6 nm (kCounts：423.6). In a magnetic test, when a magnet was placed beside the slide, the nanoparticles moved towards the magnet and aggregated at that side within a few minutes.

Test results of drug loading volume and in vitro drug release

The absorbance (A) vs cisplatin concentration (C)linear regression equation was, A=2.21387C-1.4037,r = 0.9999. The absorbance curve was linear over the concentration range 1-60 μg/ml. The enzyme digestion product value of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs was put into the regression equation to obtain the drug loading volume and envelopment rate. The envelopment rate was 89.75% when determined directly from Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs, and the effective drug loading was 15.25% when the drug was washed away from the surface of the Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs by stirring in normal saline.

Fig. 2 Fe3O4 magnetie nanoparticles detected by TEM(A), SEM-EDS(B) and ×RD(C)

Fig. 3 TEM (A) and particle size distribution(B) of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs

Fig. 4 In vitro cisplatin release curve of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs

Fig. 4 shows the in vitro release of cisplatin.The release rate from Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs was significantly slower than that in pure cisplatin solution, and it became slower with increasing time.The half release times (t1/2) of cisplatin in cisplatin solution and Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs were 65 min and 24 h respectively. The model fitting of the drug release behavior in vitro was analyzed by zeroorder kinetics equation, a kinetic equation, Higuchi equation, and Weibull equation. The results are shown in Table 1. The model of adriamycin coupled albumin nanoparticles release in vitro fit the Weibull equation,expressed as ln[-ln(1-Q)]=0.3485lnt-3.1054, and the correlation coefficient was 0.9810. The above data indicated that microspheres have a significant effect on sustained release.

Table 1 The regression equation of Adriamycin release in vitro

DISCUSSION

The search for an effective drug target delivery system is a hot topic in tumor bio-therapy. Therapy that combines a receptor and its ligand has speciticity,selectivity, saturation, strong affinity and a high probability of being bio-effect. A receptor-mediated drug delivery system makes use of specific receptors on some tissues, or over-expressed receptors of tumor cells to transfer drug to the target tissues and into the cells by pinocytosis. High specificity and high affinity can greatly improve drug delivery efficiency, increase focused drug concentration and therapeutic effect,reduce toxic effects and achieve the desired targeted treatment. For these reasons, targeted drug delivery is currently one of the most active research fields[3,5].Many studies have found that the activity and quantity of folate receptors on the surface of tumor cells (such as cancer of the ovary, colon and rectum, breast, lung and renal cells) are significantly higher than those on normal cells. With a greater understanding of cell surface folate receptors, the study of folate mediated drug targeting of tumor cells has attracted more attention[1].

In the present study, we first used EDC to activate folate, and then conjugated the activated folate with HSA. A Sephadex G-250 column was used after conjugation, because the molecular weight of folic acid is far less than that of HSA[3,5]. Fig. 1 shows the UV elution curve of Folate-HSA through a Sephadex G-250 dextran gel column. The first peak corresponds to decontaminated Folate-HSA, and the second peak corresponds to non-reacted folate. Thus Folate-HSA can be completely separated from non-reacted folate and other impurities. The present study selected albumin nanoparticles as the vector to encapsulate or adsorb drug, because albumin nanoparticle vectors have high target orientation, can control drug release,increase solubility and absorption rate of insoluble drugs, improve therapeutic effect and reduce toxic effects[7]. HSA is a safe and non-toxic carrier that is unlikely to cause any adverse immune reaction. In addition, it is bio-degradable and can be degraded in vivo by pancreatic proteolytic enzymes. Combining a drug with albumin can prevent its release at the injection site and enables the drug to be released slowly[8].

We used folate-conjugated HSA as the capsule to envelop the drug and magnetic nanoparticles to manipulate targeting. There are three main methods to prepare albumin nanoparticles： emulsion and curing,desolvation[9,10]and polymer dispersion[11]. The present experiment adopted desolvation. The desolvationchemical crosslinking method can keep drug activity while enveloping the drug in the nanoparticle. We adopted this method for further study[3,5]. We then prepared Fe3O4with superparamagnetism to form a magnetic drug delivery system which was loaded into albumin microspheres together with cisplatin. In the Investigation of in vitro drug release, the accumulative in vitro release behavior of cisplatin from Folate-CDDP/HAS MNPs was slow and there were no bursts of release, while that of adriamycin from Folate/HSA MNPs was in accordance with the Weibull equation (ln[-ln(1-Q)]=0.3485lnt-3.1054) with a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.981).

In future studies, rats can be used for the study of in vivo pharmacokinetics and body distribution. After the administration of CDDP solution and nanoparticles,a RP-HPLC method with ultraviolet detection system could be developed for the determination of CDDP in rat plasma and tissues at different times, and the pharmacokinetic parameters could be calculated by 3p87 software. The study of pharmacokinetics and body distribution is the obvious, important next step to evaluate targeting of Folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs.

Guided by an applied static magnetic field,magnetic microspheres administered locally or intravenously can be selectively concentrated at target tissue, organs, or tumor cell masses. The target drug delivery system has attracted wide attention. In an alternating magnetic field, magnetic materials can absorb the energy of electromagnetic waves and generate heat,and control the localized temperature within the range of 42-46°C to kill tumor cells.[12]The duration of the increased temperature can be adjusted to destroy cancerous tissues; while preserving normal tissues beyond the target. This treatment method is called magnetofluid thermotherapy.

In short, compared with related domestic and foreign studies, in our present study we prepared a new type of carrier for targeted drug delivery, which used magnetic albumin nanospheres as a carrier and folate receptor as target, combining chemotherapy with thermotherapy. Specifically we used high affinity bio-targeting of the target cell folate receptor with the nanoparticle ligand to guarantee safety： the therapeutic effect of this delivery system combines the oriented killing effect of chemotherapy with the physiotherapy effect of a magnetic induction temperature rise. This system can satisfy the criteria of safety, effectiveness and specificity. These three aspects must be met before a new type of biotherapy can be applied clinically.

[1] Liu H, Zhu L, Experimental study of folate mediated target arsenic white nanoparticle, Shizhen Chinese Med 2008;19：666-7.

[2] Campbell IG, Jones TA, Foulkes WD, Trowsdale J.Folate-binding protein is a marker for ovarian cancer.Cancer Res 1991;51：5329-38.

[3] Xiang JY, Xue WQ, Xiao JP,Xiang DJ, Zhang L,Guo CQ,et al. The preparation and folate-conjugated human serum albumin (Folate-HAS). Chinese Med Rep 2009;6：15-16.

[4] Du YQ, Zhang DS, Ni HY, Gu N,Yan SY,TANG QS, et al. Preparation and characterization of Fe3O4magnetic nanoparticle for tumor thermotherapy, J Chinese Electron Microsc Soc 2005;24：608-12.

[5] Zhang LK, Hou SX, Mao SJ, Wei DP, Song XR.Tumor Cell Targetability of Folate Receptor-mediated Mitoxantrone Albumin Nanoparticles. J Sichuan Univ(medical) 2006;37：77-79.

[6] Zhang YD, Wu ZJ, Gong LS, Pan YF, Huang L, Xi J, et al. Study on targeting distribution of Gal-HSA magnetic nanoparticles containing adriamycin in normal rats. J Chinese Expl Surg 2004;21：1073-1075.

[7] Zhang YD, Gong LS. Preparation of amycin loading magnetic albumin nanoparticle. J China Modern Med 2001;11：1-3.

[8] Su H, Hu JH, Li FQ. Preparation process and target progress of albumin nanoparticle. J Chin Pharm 2005：40：641-4.

[9] Weber C, Kreuter J, Langer K. Desolvation process and surface characteristics of HSA-nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2000;196：197-200.

[10] Langer K, Balthasar S, Vogel V, Dinauer N, von Briesen H, Schubert D, et al, Optimization of the preparation process for human serum albumin (HSA) nanoparticles.Int J Pharm 2003;257：169-80.

[11] Lin W, Garnett MC, Davies MC, Bignotti F, Ferruti P,Davis SS, et al. Preparation of surface-modified albumin nanoparticles. Biomaterials 1997;18：559-65.

[12] Yan SY, Zhang DS, Zheng J, Gu N, Wang ZY, Du YQ, et al. Study on the therapeutic effect of Fe2O3nanometer magnetic fluid hyperthermia on liver cancer, J Chinese Exp Surg 2004;21：1443-6.